Gender effects in private value auctions

Economics Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 375-382

  Ham, John C ^a   Kagel, John H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auctions; Gender effects; Two stage bidding

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748062351     PISSN: 01651765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Casari, M., Ham, J., Kagel, J., 2004. Selection bias, demographic effects and ability effects in common value auction experiments. Ohio State University working paper.
2. Chen, Y., Katusack, P., Ozdenoren, E., 2004. Impact of demographic, menstrual cycle, and educational background in private value auctions. University of Michigan working paper.
3. Croson, R., Gneezy, U.,, 2004, Gender differences in preferences, mimeographed, University of Chicago.
4. Kagel, J., Pevnitskaya, S., Ye, L., 2004. Indicative bidding: an experimental analysis. Ohio State University working paper.
5. Niederle M., and Vesterlund E. Do women shy away from competition?. Paper Presented at the SITE Conference on Experimental Economics (2004)
6. Rutstrom E. Homegrown values and incentive compatible auction design. International Journal of Game Theory 27 (1998) 427-441
7. Ye, L., in press. Indicative bidding and a theory of two-stage auctions. Games and Economic Behavior.