Diagnosis of breast cancer using diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: Comparison of a Monte Carlo versus partial least squares analysis based feature extraction technique

Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 714-724

  Zhu, Changfang ^a   Palmer, Gregory M ^b   Breslin, Tara M ^c   Harter, Josephine ^d   Ramanujam, Nirmala ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Absorption; Diffuse reflectance; Monte Carlo inverse model; Optical properties; Optical spectroscopy; Scattering; Spectrum, breast tissues

Indexed keywords

BETA CAROTENE; HEMOGLOBIN;

ACCURACY; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIFFUSE REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTRUM; TECHNIQUE;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; BETA CAROTENE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEOPLASMS, FIBROUS TISSUE; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET;

EID: 33748056820     PISSN: 01968092     EISSN: 10969101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20356     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. US-guided core breast biopsy: Use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208(3):717-723.
2. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Jr., Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: False-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210(3):799-805.
3. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, DiPiro PJ, Denison CM, Harvey SC, Christian RL, Richardson A, Ko WD. Large-needle core biopsy: Nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 1998;206(3):717-720.
4. Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: Results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996;198(2):323-325.
5. Ghosh N, Mohanty SK, Majumder SK, Gupta PK. Measurement of optical transport properties of normal and malignant human breast tissue. Appl Opt 2001;40(1):176-184.
6. Bigio IJ, Mourant JR. Ultraviolet and visible spectroscopies for tissue diagnostics: Fluorescence spectroscopy and elastic-scattering spectroscopy. Phys Med Biol 1997;42(5):803-814.
7. Zonios G, Perelman LT, Backman V, Manoharan R, Fitzmaurice M, Van Dam J, Feld MS. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of human adenomatous colon polyps in vivo. Appl Opt 1999;38(31):6628-6637.
8. Yang Y, Celmer EJ, Koutcher JA, Alfano RR. UV reflectance spectroscopy probes DNA and protein changes in human breast tissues. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2001;19(1): 35-39.
9. Yang Y, Katz A, Celmer EJ, Zurawska Szczepaniak M, Alfano RR. Optical spectroscopy of benign and malignant breast tissues. Lasers Life Sci 1996;7(2):115-127.
10. Pushkarev SV, Naumov SA, Vovk SM, Volovodenko VA, Udut W. Application of laser fluorescence spectroscopy and diffuse reflection spectroscopy in diagnosing the states of mammary gland tissue. Optoelectronics Instrumen Data Process 1999; 2:71-76.
11. Palmer GM, Zhu C, Breslin TM, Xu F, Gilchrist KW, Ramanujam N. Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003). IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50(11):1233-1242.
12. Bigio IJ, Bown SG, Briggs G, Kelley C, Lakhani S, Pickard D, Ripley PM, Rose IG, Saunders C. Diagnosis of breast cancer using elastic-scattering spectroscopy: Preliminary clinical results. J Biomed Opt 2000;5(2):221-228.
13. Palmer GM, Zhu C, Breslin TM, Xu F, Gilchrist KW, Ramanujam N. A Monte Carlo based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties, part II: Application to breast cancer diagnosis. Appl Opt 2006;45(5):1072-1078.
14. Palmer GM, Ramanujam N. A Monte Carlo based inverse model for calculating tissue optical properties, part I: Theory and validation on synthetic phantoms. Appl Opt 2006;45(5): 1062-1071.
15. Zhu C, Palmer GM, Breslin TM, Xu F, Ramanujam N. The use of a multi-separation fiber optic probe for the optical diagnosis of breast cancer. J Biomed Opt 2005;10(2):024032.
16. Liu Q, Zhu C, Ramanujam N. Experimental validation of Monte Carlo modeling of fluorescence in tissues in the UV-visible spectrum. J Biomed Opt 2003;8:223-236.
17. Bolin FP, Preuss LE, Taylor RC, Ference RJ. Refractive index of some mammalian tissues using a fiber optic cladding method. Appl Opt 1989;28(12):2297-2303.
18. Mourant JR, Freyer JP, Hielscher AH, Eick AA, Shen D, Johnson TM. Mechanisms of light scattering from biological cells relevant to noninvasive optical-tissue diagnostics. Appl Opt 1998;37(16):3586-3593.
19. Yang Y, Celmer EJ, Koutcher JA, Alfano RR. DNA and protein changes caused by disease in human breast tissues probed by the Kubelka-Munk spectral functional. Photochem Photobiol 2002;75(6):627-632.
20. Prahl S. Optical properties spectra. 2001 http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/.
21. Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. 2003. 1193p.
22. Martens H. Multivariate calibration. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1989.
23. Bethea RM, Duran BS, Bouillon TL. Statistical methods for engineers and scientists. New York: M. Dekker. 1995. xxi, 652p.
24. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An introduction to support vector machines: And other Kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. 2000.
25. Hjorth JSU. Computer intensive statistical methods: Validation, model selection, and bootstrap. London, New York: Chapman & Hall. 1994.
26. Tromberg BJ, Shah N, Lanning R, Cerussi A, Espinoza J, Pham T, Svaasand L, Butler J. Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy. Neoplasia 2000;2(1-2):26-40.
27. Poplack SP, Paulsen KD, Hartov A, Meaney PM, Pogue BW, Tosteson TD, Grove MR, Soho SK, Wells WA. Electromagnetic breast imaging: Average tissue property values in women with negative clinical findings. Radiology 2004; 231(2):571-580.
28. Durduran T, Choe R, Culver JP, Zubkov L, Holboke MJ, Giammarco J, Chance B, Yodh AG. Bulk optical properties of healthy female breast tissue. Phys Med Biol 2002;47(16): 2847-2861.
29. Pogue BW, Poplack SP, McBride TO, Wells WA, Osterman KS, Osterberg UL, Paulsen KD. Quantitative hemoglobin tomography with diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy: Pilot results in the breast. Radiology 2001;218(1):261-266.
30. Spinelli L, Torricelli A, Pifferi A, Taroni P, Danesini GM, Cubeddu R. Bulk optical properties and tissue components in the female breast from multiwavelength time-resolved optical mammography. J Biomed Opt 2004;9(6):1137-1142.
31. Grosenick D, Moesta KT, Wabnitz H, Mucke J, Stroszczynski C, Macdonald R, Schlag PM, Rinneberg H. Time-domain optical mammography: Initial clinical results on detection and characterization of breast tumors. Appl Opt 2003;42(16): 3170-3186.
32. Peters VG, Wyman DR, Patterson MS, Frank GL. Optical properties of normal and diseased human breast tissues in the visible and near infrared. Phys Med Biol 1990;35(9): 1317-1334.
33. Srinivasan S, Pogue BW, Jiang S, Dehghani H, Kogel C, Soho S, Gibson JJ, Tosteson TD, Poplack SP, Paulsen KD. Interpreting hemoglobin and water concentration, oxygen saturation, and scattering measured in vivo by near-infrared breast tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100(21): 12349-12354.
34. Cerussi AE, Jakubowski D, Shah N, Bevilacqua F, Lanning R, Berger AJ, Hsiang D, Butler J, Holcombe RF, Tromberg BJ. Spectroscopy enhances the information content of optical mammography. J Biomed Opt 2002;7(1):60-71.
35. Mueller-Klieser W, Schlenger KH, Walenta S, Gross M, Karbach U, Hoeckel M, Vaupel P. Pathophysiological approaches to identifying tumor hypoxia in patients. Radiother Oncol 1991;20 (Suppl 1):21-28.
36. Vaupel P, Schlenger K, Knoop C, Hockel M. Oxygenation of human tumors: Evaluation of tissue oxygen distribution in breast cancers by computerized 02 tension measurements. Cancer Res 1991;51(12):3316-3322.
37. Cerussi AE, Berger AJ, Bevilacqua F, Shah N, Jakubowski D, Butler J, Holcombe RF, Tromberg BJ. Sources of absorption and scattering contrast for near-infrared optical mammography. Acad Radiol 2001;8(3):211-218.
38. Thomsen S, Tatman D. Physiological and pathological factors of human breast disease that can influence optical diagnosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998;838:171-193.