The use of neuromonitoring for neurological injury detection and implant accuracy

Complications of Pediatric and Adult Spinal Surgery

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 159-172

  Schwartz, Daniel M ^a   Sestokas, Anthony K ^a  

^a Surgical Monitoring Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748048397     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Turner LA, et al. Neurophysiological identification of iatrogenic neural injury during complex spine surgery. Semin Spine Surg 1998; 10: 242-251.
2. Schwartz D, Wierzbowski L, Fan D, Sestokas A. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery. In: Vaccaro A, Betz R, Zeidman S, eds. Principles and Practices of Spine Surgery. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2002: 115-126.
3. Schwartz DM. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during post-traumatic spine surgery. In: Vaccaro AR, ed. Fractures of the Cervical, Thoracic and Lumbar Spine. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2002: 373-383.
4. Tanner WP Jr, Swets JA. A clinical decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychol Rev 1954; 61: 401-409.
5. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
6. Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285-1293.
7. Minahan RE, Sepkuty JP, Lesser RP, Sponseller PD, Kostuik JP. Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1442-1450.
8. Owen JH, Bridwell KH, Grubb R, et al. The clinical application of neurogenic motor evoked potentials to monitor spinal cord function during surgery. Spine 1991; 16: S385-S390.
9. Owen JH. Monitoring during surgery for spinal deformities. In: Bridwell K, DeWald RL, eds. Textbook of Spinal Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997: 39-60.
10. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Somatosensory and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine 1998; 23: 1392-1400.
11. Leppanen R, Madigan R, Sears C, et al. Intraoperative collision studies demonstrate descending spinal cord stimulated evoked potentials and ascending somatosensory evoked potentials are mediated through common pathways. J Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 16: 170.
12. Toleikis JR, Skelly JP, Carlvin AO, Burkus JK. Spinally elicited peripheral nerve responses are sensory rather than motor. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 736-742.
13. Fan D, Schwartz DM, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiologic detection of iatrogenic C5 nerve root injury during laminectomy for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 2002; 27(22): 2499-2502.
14. Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK. A systems based algorithmic approach to intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery. Semin Spine Surg 2002; 14(2): 136-145.
15. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, Kanim LE, Sherman JE. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96(1): 6-11.
16. York DH, Chabot RJ, Gaines RW. Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery. Spine 1987; 12(9): 864-876.
17. Hilibrand AS, Schwartz DM, Sethuraman, V, Vaccaro AR, Albert, TJ. Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. In Press.
18. Schwartz DM, Vacarro AR, Hilibrand AS, Sestokas A, Albert TJ. Transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring as an early indicator of emerging thoracic spinal cord ischemic injury. Presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society, Montreal, Canada, November 2, 2002.