Determinants of offline processing of visual information for the control of reaching movements

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 331-338

  Bernier, Pierre Michel ^a   Chua, Romeo ^a   Franks, Ian M ^a   Khan, Michael A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Offline processing; Reaching movements; Visual feedback

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KINEMATICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PLANNING; PROPRIOCEPTION; VISION;

ADULT; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33747877784     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.38.5.331-338     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abahnini, K., & Proteau, L. (1999). The role of peripheral and central visual information for the directional control of manual aiming movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 160-175.
2. Abahnini, K., Proteau, L., & Temprado, J. J. (1997). Evidence supporting the importance of peripheral visual information for the directional control of aiming movement. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 230-242.
3. Baud-Bovy, G., & Viviani, P. (2004). Amplitude and direction errors in kinesthetic pointing. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 197-214.
4. Bédard, P., & Proteau, L. (2003). On the role of peripheral visual afferent information for the control of rapid video-aiming movements. Acta Psychologica, 113, 99-117.
5. Desmurget, M., Vindras, P., Gréa, H., Viviani, P., & Grafton, S. T. (2000). Proprioception does not quickly drift during visual occlusion. Experimental Brain Research, 134, 363-377.
6. Elliott, D., Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., & Chua, R. (1991). Discrete vs. continuous control of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 10, 393-418.
7. Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 342-357.
8. Ghez, C., Gordon, J., & Ghilardi, M. F. (1995). Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 361-372.
9. Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (1994). Accuracy of planar reaching movements 1: Independence of direction and extent variability. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 97-111.
10. Gordon, J., Iyer, M., & Ghez, C. (1987). Impairment of motor programming and trajectory control in a deafferented patient. Society for Neuroscience Abstract, 13, 352.
11. Hay, L., & Beaubaton, D. (1986). Visual correction of a rapid goal-directed response. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 51-57.
12. Khan, M. A., Elliott, D., Coull, J., Chua, R., & Lyons, J. (2002). Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: Kinematic evidence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 45-57.
13. Khan, M. A., & Franks, I. M. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the production of component submovements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 285-295.
14. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G. P., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., & Pembroke, S. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychologica, 113, 83-97.
15. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G. P., Franks, I. M., & Buckolz, E. (2004). The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 241-251.
16. Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986). Visual, auditory and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integrations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 640-662.
17. Messier, J., & Kalaska, J. F. (1999). Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 139-152.
18. Proteau, L. (2004). Visual afferent information dominates other sources of afferent information during mixed practice of a video-aiming task. Experimental Brain Research, 161, 441-456.
19. Rossetti, Y., Desmurget, M., & Prablanc, C. (1995). Vectorial coding of movement: Vision, proprioception or both? Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 457-463.
20. Sainburg, R. L., Ghez, C., & Kalakanis, D. (1999). Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1045-1056.
21. Sarlegna, F., Blouin, J., Vercher, J. L., Bresciani, J. P., Bourdin, C., & Gauthier, G. M. (2004). Online control of the direction of rapid reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 468-471.
22. Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2005). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 458-473.
23. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (1998). Specificity of practice: The case of powerlifting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 284-289.
24. Wann, J. P., & Ibrahim, S. F. (1992). Does limb proprioception drift? Experimental Brain Research, 91, 162-166.
25. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1-114.
26. Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., & Kisselburgh, L. (1983). Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 217-236.