Multicenter evaluation of the Breast Lesion Excision System, a percutaneous, vacuum-assisted, intact-specimen breast biopsy device

Cancer

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 945-949

  Sie, Angela ^a   Bryan, David C ^b   Gaines, Victor ^c   Killebrew, Larry K ^d   Kim, Christine H ^e   Morrison, Carrie C ^f   Poller, William R ^g   Romilly, Ada P ^h   Schilling, Kathy ⁱ   Sung, Janet H ^j  

^a Long Beach Memorial Breast Center   (United States)

^b Hill Breast Center   (United States)

^c Vassar Brothers Hospital   (United States)

^d Oklahoma Breast Care Center   (United States)

^e Polak Breast Diagnostic Center   (United States)

^f St Johns Mercy Medical Center   (United States)

^g Allegheny Breast Care Center   (United States)

^h H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ Center for Breast Care   (United States)

^j Windsong Radiology   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

ADH; Atypia; Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Breast biopsy; DCIS; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Invasive ductal carcinoma; Radioirequency assisted biopsy; Vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST LESION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; VACUUM;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VACUUM;

EID: 33747873803     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22090     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Liberman L. Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1191-1199.
2. Pandelidis S, Heiland D, Jones D, Stough K, Trapeni J, Suliman Y. Accuracy of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy of mammographic breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:43-47.
3. Cangiarella J, Waisman J, Symmans WF, et al. Mammotome core biopsy for mammary microcalcification: analysis of 160 biopsies from 142 women with surgical and radiologic followup. Cancer. 2001;91:173-177.
4. Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Bailey S. Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:14-17.
5. Lomoschitz FM, Helbich TH, Rudas M, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: influence of number of specimens on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology. 2004;232:897-903.
6. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology. 2002;224:548-554.
7. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology. 2001;218:497-502.
8. Adrales G, Turk P, Wallace T, Bird R, Norton HJ, Greene F. Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by Mammotome? Am J Surg. 2000;180:313-315.
9. Liberman L, Sama MP. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:53-58.
10. Philpotts LE, Lee CH, Horvath LJ, Lange RC, Carter D, Tocino I. Underestimation of breast cancer with 11-gauge vacuum suction biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1047-1050.
11. Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Menell JH, Dershaw DD. To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:679-683.
12. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1503-1507.
13. Winchester DJ, Bernstein JR, Jeske JM, et al. Upstaging of atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum-assisted 11-gauge stereotactic core needle biopsy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:619-622; discussion 22-23.
14. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA. 1999;281:1638-1641.
15. Burak WE Jr., Owens KE, Tighe MB, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: histologic underestimation of malignant lesions. Arch Surg. 2000;135:700-703.
16. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology. 1998;208:251-260.
17. Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M. Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology. 2001;221:495-503.
18. Darling ML, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: results of surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1341-1346.
19. American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS), 3rd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1998.