Histomorphometric analysis of pure titanium implants with porous surface versus rough surface

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 213-218

  Brentel, Aline Scalone ^a   De Vasconcellos, Luana Marotta Reis ^a,d   Oliveira, Marize Varella ^b   Graça, Mário Lima De Alencastro ^c   De Vasconcellos, Luis Gustavo Oliveira ^d   Cairo, Carlos Alberto Alves ^c   Carvalho, Yasmin Rodarte ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUTO DE ESTUDOS AVANÇADOS   (Brazil)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Bone; Implants; Osseointegration; Porous: Rough; Surface

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747816787     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572006000300013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bagno A, Bello CD. Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15:935-49.
2. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:302-10.
3. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials. 1996;17(2):137-46.
4. Braceras I, Alava JI, Oñate JI, Brizela M, Garcia-Luis A, Garagorri N, et al. Improved osseointegration in ion implantation-treated dental implants. Surface e coating Tecnology. 2002;158:28-32.
5. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosth Dent. 1983;50(3):399-410.
6. Brunski BJ. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:99-119.
7. Cook SD, Rust-Dawicki AM. In vivo evaluation of a CSTi dental implant: a healing time course study. J Oral Implantology. 1995;2(3):182-90.
8. Cornell CN, Lane JM. Current understanding of osteoconduction in bone regeneration. Clin Orthop. 1998;1(355S):267-73.
9. Deporter DA, Todescan R, Riley N. Porous-surfaced dental implants in the partially edentulous maxilla: assessment for subclinical mobility. Int J Period Rest Dent. 2002;22(2):184-92.
10. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, Melcher AH, Winslow J, Howley TP. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs. J Dent Res. 1986;65(8):1064-70.
11. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, Chipman ML, Valiquete N. A histological comparison in the dog of porous coated vs: threaded dental implants. J Dent Res. 1990;69(5):1138-45.
12. Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental implants. Periodontoly 2000 1998;17:36-46.
13. Fini M, Savarino L, Nicoli Aldini N, Martini L, Giavaresi G, Rizzi G, et al. Biomechanical and histomorphometric investigations on two morphologically differing titanium surfaces with and without fluorhydroxyapatite coating: an experimental study in sheep tibiae. Biomaterials. 2003;24(19):3183-92.
14. Frosch KH, Barvencik F, Lohmann CH, Viereck V, Siggelkow H, Breme J, et al. Migration, matrix production and lamellar bone formation of human osteoblast-like cells in porous titanium implants. Cells Tissues Organs. 2002;170:214-27.
15. Karabuda C, Sandalli P, Yalcin S, Steflik DE, Parr GR. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:510-5.
16. Kasemo B. Biocompatibility of titanium implants: surface science aspects. J Prosth Dent. 1983;49(6):832-7.
17. Nguyen HQ, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Valiquette N, Yakubovich R. The effect of sol-gel formed calcium phosphate coatings on bone ingrowth and osteoconductivity of porous-surfaced Ti alloy implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25(5):865-76.
18. Oliveira MV, Pereira LC, Cairo CAA, Porous structure characterization in titanium coating for surgical implants. Mater Res. 2002;5(3):269-73.
19. Pilliar RM. Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants: textured and porous surface-structured designs. Implant Dentistry. 1998;7(4):305-14.
20. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod. 1984;86(2):95-111.
21. Shenk RK, Buser D. Osseointegration: a reality. Periodontology 2000. 1998;17:22-35.
22. Story JB, Wagner WR, Gaisser DM, Cook SD, Rust-Dawicki AM. In vivo performance of a modified CSTi dental implant coating. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:749-57.
23. Svehla J, Morberg P, Zicat B, Bruce W, Sonnabend D, Walsh WR. Morphometric and mechanical evaluation of titanium implant integration: comparison of five surface structures. Biomed Mater Res. 2000;51:15-22.
24. Vasconcellos LMR, Momose DR, Brentel AS, Oliveira MV, Cairo CAA, Carvalho YR. Surgical Tecnique to place porous surface dental implants. Acta Microscopic. 2003;12(SuplC):265-6.
25. Vidigal Junior MG, Aragones LCA, Campos Junior A, Groisman M. Histomorphometric analyses of hydroxyapatite-coated and uncoated titanium dental implants in rabbit cortical bone. Implant Dent. 1999;8(3):295-302.
26. Zinger O, Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Simpson J, Wieland M, Landolt D, et al. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1837-47.