Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine

Orthopedics

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 716-722

  Cakir, Balkan ^a   Richter, Marcus ^a   Huch, Klaus ^a   Puhl, Wolfhart ^a   Schmidt, René ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; POLYCARBONATE; POLYETHERURETHAN; POLYETHYLENE; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; TITANIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE PLATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MENINX DISORDER; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PEDICLE SCREW; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE STABILIZATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33747805601     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20060801-04     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine. 1988; 13:375-377.
2. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop. 1999; 28:336-340.
3. Ganey TM, Meisel HJ. A potential role for cell-based therapeutics in the treatment of intervertebral disc herniation. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(suppl 2):S206-S214.
4. Gruber HE, Johnson TL, Leslie K, et al. Autologous intervertebral disc cell implantation: a model using Psammomys obesus, the sand rat. Spine. 2002; 27:1626-1633.
5. Okuma M, Mochida J, Nishimura K, et al. Reinsertion of stimulated nucleus pulposus cells retards intervertebral disc degeneration: an in vitro and in vivo experimental study. J Orthop Res. 2000; 18:988-997.
6. Cakir B, Schmidt R, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M. Sagittal alignment and segmental range of motion after total disc replacement of the lumbar spine [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2004; 142:159-165.
7. Cakir B, Ulmar B, Koepp H, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M. Posterior dynamic stabilization as an alternative for dorso-ventral fusion in spinal stenosis with degenerative stability [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003; 141:418-424.
8. Hopf C, Heeckt H, Beske C. Disc replacement with the SB Charite endoprosthesis - experience, preliminary results and comments after 35 prospectively performed operations [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002; 140:485-491.
9. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(suppl 2):S131-S136.
10. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J.2002; 11(suppl 2):S170-S178.
11. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine. 1994; 19(20 suppl):2256s-2265s.
12. Herron LD, Trippi AC. L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The results of treatment by decompressive laminectomy without fusion. Spine. 1989; 14:534-538.
13. Dall BE, Rowe DE. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Its surgical management. Spine. 1985; 10:668-672.
14. Herkowitz HN. Lumbar spinal stenosis: indications for arthrodesis and spinal instrumentation. Instr Course Lect. 1994; 43:425-433.
15. Johnsson KE, Redlund-Johnell I, Uden A, Willner S. Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1989; 14:591-593.
16. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine. 1997; 22:2807-2812.
17. Mayer HM, Korge A. Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(suppl 2):S85-S91.
18. Freudiger S, Dubois G, Lorrain M. Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999; 119:127-132.
19. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A, Oose I. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(suppl 2):S124-S130.
20. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine. 1982; 7:335-342.
21. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine. 1994; 19:1611-1618.
22. Wood K, Kos P, Schendel M. Effect of patient position on the sagittal plane profile of the thoracolumbar spine. J Spinal Disord. 1996; 9:165-169.
23. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine. 1995; 20:1351-1358.
24. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord. 2003; 16:369-383.
25. Dubois G, de Germay B, Schaerer NS, et al. Dynamic neutralization: a new concept for restabilization of the spine. In: Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Pope MH, eds. Lumbar Segmental Instability. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 1999:233-240.