Highly sensitive magnetometers-a review

Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical

Volumn 129, Issue 1-2 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 86-93

  Robbes, D ^a  

^a CNRS Groupe de Recherche en Informatique Image   (France)

Author keywords

Atomic vapor magnetometer; GMR; Magnetic field sensors; Magnetic tunnel junction; Spin valve; SQUID

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC DEVICES; MAGNETOSTRICTION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SQUIDS; SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS; TUNNEL JUNCTIONS;

ATOMIC VAPOR MAGNETOMETERS; GMR; MAGNETIC FIELD SENSORS; MAGNETIC TUNNEL JUNCTIONS; SPIN VALVES;

MAGNETOMETERS;

EID: 33747801444     PISSN: 09244247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.11.023     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Robbes D., Article Invité C., Dolabdjian S., Saez Y., Monfort G., Kaiser P., and Ciereanu. Highly sensitive uncooled magnetometers: state of the art superconducting magnetic hybrid magnetometers, an alternative to SQUIDs? PT ASC 2000. Virginia Beach, September 2000. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11 1 (2001) 629-634
2. c superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system. Z. Phys. B 64 (1986) 189-193
3. Phillips J.M. Substrate selection for high temperature superconducting thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 9 4 (1996) 1829-1848
4. Chaudary P., Mannhart J., Dimos D., Tsuei C.C., Chi J., Oprysko M.M., and Scheurmann M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1653
5. Koch H. SQUID magnetocardiography: status and perspectives. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11 1 (2001) 49-59
6. Tavarozzi I., Comani S., Del Gratta C., Di Luzio S., Romani§ G.L., Gallina S., Zimarino M., Brisinda D., Fenici R., and De Caterina R. Ital Heart J. 3 3 (2002) 151-165
7. c SQUID gradiometer system for magnetocardiography in an unshielded environment. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 (2003) 1426-1429
8. c dc SQUID electronics. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16 (2003) 1320-1336 Online at stacks.iop.org/SUST/16/1320
9. Drung D. High-performance DC SQUID read-out electronics. Physica C 368 (2002) 134-140
10. Budker D., Gawlik W., Kimball D.F., Rochester S.M., Yashchuk V.V., and Weis A. Resonant nonlinear magneto-optical effects in atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 4 (2002) 1153-2002
11. http://www.gemsys.ca/current/index.html
12. G. Bison, R. Wynands, A. Weis, Optimization and performance of an optical cardio-magnetometer, arXiv:physics/0406157 v1 30 Jun 2004.
13. Bison G., Wynands R., and Weis A. A laser-pumped magnetometer for the mapping of human cardio-magnetic fields. Appl. Phys. B 76 (2003) 325-328
14. Bison G., Wynands R., and Weis A. Dynamical mapping of the human cardiomagnetic field using a room temperature, laser-optical sensor. Opt. Express 11 8 (2003) 904-909
15. Dolabdjian C., Saez S., Reyes Toledo A., and Robbes D. Signal to noise improvement of biomagnetic signals using a flux gate probe and a real time signal processing. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69 10 (1998) 3678-3680
16. Slocum R.E., and Ryan L. Earth Science Technology Conference on Self-calibrating Vector Magnetometer for Space. Pasadena Hilton, Pasadena, CA, 11 and 13 June (2002) paper B3P4. web address: esto.nasa.gov/conferences/estc-2002/Papers/B3P4(Slocum).pdf
17. Buckler D., Kimball D.F., Rochester S.M., Yashchuk V.V., and Zolotorev M. Sensitive magnetometry based on non-linear magneto-optical rotation. Phys. Rev. A 62 (2000) 043403
18. Kominis I.K., Kornack T.W., Allred J.C., and Romalis M.V. A subfemtotsla multichannel atomic magnetometer. Nature 42 (2003) 596-599
19. J.P. Wikswo, SQUIDs remain best tool for measuring Brains's magnetic field, Phys. Today February (2003).
20. M. Pannetier, C. Fermon, G. Le Goff, J. Simola, E. Kerr, Femtotesla magnetic field measurement with magnetoresistive sensors, Science June (2004).
21. M. Pannetier, C. Fermon, G. Legoff, E. Kerr, Ultra-sensitive mixed sensors-design and performance, paper M-P.30, this conference.
22. Perez L., Dolabdjian C., Waché W., and Butin L. Advance in magnetoresistance magnetometer performances applied in eddy current sensors arrays. Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Non-destruction Testing. Montreal, Canada, August 30-September 3 (2004)
23. Perez L., Le Hir J., Dolabdjian C., and Butin L. Investigation of fatigue cracks under rivet head airframe using improved GMR magnetometer in an eddy current system. J. Electrical Eng. 55 10/S (2004) 10-11
24. Knobel M., Vazquez M., and Kraus L. In: Buschow J. (Ed). Handbook of Magnetic Materials vol. 15 (2003), Elsevier 497-563 (Chapter 5)
25. D. Ménard, G. Rudkowska, L. Clime, P. Ciureanu, A. Yelon, S. Saez, C. Dolabdjian, D. Robbes, Progress towards the optimization of the signal-to-noise ratio in giant magnetoimpedance sensors, this conference.
26. A. Boukhenoufa, C. Dolabdjian, D. Robbes, High sensitivity giant magneto-inductive magnetometer characterization implemented with a low frequency magnetic noise reduction technic, Rev. Scientific Instrum., in press.
27. Vetoshko P.M., Volkovoy V.B., Zalogin V.N., and Toporov A.Yu. J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 6298-6300
28. Vetoshko P.M., Valeiko M.V., and Nikitin P.I. Epitaxial yttrium iron garnet film as an active medium of an even-harmonic magnetic field transducer. Sens. Actuators A 106 (2003) 270-273
29. Valeiko M.V., Vetoshko P.M., and Nikitin P.I. Proceedings of the Third EMSA Conference. Dresden, July 19-21 (2000) 141-142
30. Solin S.A., Thio T., Hines R.R., and Heremans J.J. Science 289 (2000) 530
31. Müller C.H., Kronenwerth O., Heyn Ch., and Grundler D. Low noise magnetic flux sensors based on the extraordinary magnetoresistance effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 17 (2004) 3343-3345