Secure and useful data sharing

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 204-220

  Sarathy, Rathindra ^a   Muralidhar, Krishnamurty ^b  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Data sharing; E commerce; E government; Privacy

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; DATA TRANSFER; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; ELECTRONIC COMMUNITIES; INTERNET; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DATA SHARING; E-GOVERNMENT;

SECURITY OF DATA;

EID: 33747756443     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2004.10.013     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adam N.R., and Wortmann J.C. Security-control methods for statistical databases: a comparative study. ACM Computing Surveys 21 4 (1989) 515-556
2. Cachon G., and Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Science 46 8 (2000) 1032-1048
3. Cachon G., and Lariviere M. Contracting to assure supply: how to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Science 47 5 (2001) 629-646
4. Cachon G., and Zipkin P. Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a 2 stage supply chain. Management Science 45 7 (1999) 936-953
5. Cavoukian A. Data mining: staking a claim on your privacy (1998), Publication of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada
6. Chin F.Y., and Ozsoyoglu G. Auditing and inference control in statistical databases. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 8 6 (1982) 574-582
7. Cline K. Planning for privacy. Banking Strategies 76 6 (2000) 110
8. Dalenius T. Towards a methodology for statistical disclosure control. Statistisktidskrift 5 1 (1977) 429-444
9. Denning D.E., and Schlorer R.J. Inference control for statistical databases. Computer 16 7 (1983) 69-82
10. DePompa B. There's gold in the databases. Information Week (1996 (January 8)) 54
11. Dey D. Record matching in data warehouses: a decision model for data consolidation. Operations Research 51 2 (2003) 240-255
12. D. Dey, V. Mookerjee, Techniques for efficient record linkage in heterogeneous databases, Working paper (2003).
13. Dey D., Sarkar S., and De P. A probabilistic decision model for entity matching in heterogeneous databases. Management Science 44 10 (1998) 1379-1395
14. Duncan G.T., and Lambert D. Disclosure-limited data dissemination. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 1 (1986) 10-18
15. Duncan G.T., and Mukherjee S. Optimal disclosure limitation strategy in statistical databases: deterring tracker attacks through additive noise. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 3 (2000) 720-729
16. Duncan G.T., and Pearson R.W. Enhancing access to microdata while protecting confidentiality: prospects for the future. Statistical Science 6 3 (1991) 219-239
17. G.T. Duncan, R. Krishnan, R. Padman, S.F. Roehrig, Exact and heuristic methods for cell suppression in multi-dimensional linked tables, NISS Technical Report (2004).
18. Dutta Chowdhury S., Duncan G.T., Krishnan R., Roehrig S.F., and Mukherjee S. Disclosure detection in multivariate categorical databases: auditing confidentiality protection through two new matrix operators. Management Science 45 12 (1999) 1710-1723
19. Fellegi J.P., and Suntner A.B. A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69 6 (1969) 1183-1210
20. Fienberg S.E. Confidentiality and data protection through disclosure limitation: evolving principles and technical advances. Philippine Statistician 49 1-4 (2000) 1-12
21. Fienberg S.E., Makov U.E., and Steele R.J. Disclosure limitation using perturbation and related methods for categorical data. Journal of Official Statistics 14 2 (1998) 347-360
22. GAO, The Challenge of Data Sharing: Results of a GAO-sponsored Symposium on Benefit and Loan programs, United States General Accounting Office Report, GAO-01-67 (2000) (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0167.pdf).
23. GAO, Record Linkage and Privacy: Issues in Creating New Federal Research and Statistical Information, United States General Accounting Office Report, GAO-01-126SP (2001) (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01126sp.pdf).
24. Garfinkel R., Gopal R., and Goes P. Privacy protection of binary confidential data against deterministic, stochastic, and insider threat. Management Science 48 6 (2002) 749-764
25. Gavirneni S., Kapuscinski R., and Tayur S. Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Science 45 1 (1999) 16-24
26. Geoffrion A.M., and Krishnan R. Prospects for operations research in the e-business era. Interface 31 2 (2001) 6-36
27. Gopal R., Goes P., and Garfinkel R. Interval protection of confidential information in a database. INFORMS Journal on Computing 10 3 (1998) 552-571
28. Gopal R., Garfinkel R., and Goes P. Confidentiality via camouflage: the CVC approach to disclosure limitation when answering queries to databases. Operations Research 50 3 (2002) 501-516
29. Hansen S.L., and Mukherjee S. A polynomial algorithm for optimal univariate microaggregation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15 4 (2003) 1043-1044
30. Kadane J.B. Some statistical problems in merging data files. Journal of Official Statistics 17 3 (2001) 422-433
31. Kelly J.P., Golden B.L., Assad A.J., and Baker E.K. Controlled rounding for tabular data. Operations Research 38 5 (1990) 760-772
32. H. Lee, S. Whang, Information Sharing in a Supply Chain, Research Paper No. 1549, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 1998.
33. Lee H., and Whang S. Supply chain integration in the age of e-business. Supply Chain Management Review 3 3 (1999) 16-19
34. H. Lee, S. Whang, Supply Chain Integration over the Internet, http://www.commerce.net/research/ebusiness-strategies/2k1/2k1_2k1_r.pdf (2001).
35. Lee H.S., So K.C., and Tang C.S. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science 46 5 (2000) 626-643
36. R.A. Moore, Controlled Data Swapping Techniques for Masking Public Use Microdata Files, Census Bureau Research Report Series (RR96-04) (1996).
37. Muralidhar K., Parsa R., and Sarathy R. A general additive data perturbation method for database security. Management Science 45 10 (1999) 1399-1415
38. Palley M.A., and Simonoff J.S. The use of regression methodology for the compromise of confidential information in statistical databases. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 12 4 (1987) 593-608
39. Rubin D.B. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys (1987), John Wiley, New York
40. Rubin D.B. Statistical disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics 9 2 (1993) 461-468
41. Sarathy R., and Muralidhar K. The security of confidential numerical data in databases. Information Systems Research 13 4 (2002) 389-403
42. Sarathy R., Muralidhar K., and Parsa R. Perturbing non-normal confidential attributes: the copula approach. Management Science 48 12 (2002) 1613-1627
43. Schonberg E., Cofino T., Hoch R., Podlaseck M., and Spraragen S.L. Measuring success. Communications of the ACM 43 8 (2000) 53 (Internet/Web/Online Service Information)
44. G.R. Simpson, Census Bureau Blurs Data to Keep Names Confidential, Wall Street Journal Online (http://www.wsj.com) (Feb. 14, 2001).
45. Smith H.J. Privacy policies and practices: inside the organizational maze. Communications of the ACM 36 12 (1993) 105-122
46. Willenborg L., and de Waal T. Elements of statistical disclosure control (2001), Springer-Verlag, New York
47. Winkler W.E. Advanced methods for record linkage. Census Bureau Research Report Series (RR94/05) (1994)
48. Winkler W.E. The state of record linkage and current research problems. Census Bureau Research Report Series (RR99/04) (1999)
49. Winkler W.E. Record linkage software and methods for merging administrative lists. Census Bureau Research Report Series (RR01/03) (2001)