The semiotics of the schema: Kanty Piaget, and the calculator

Activity and Sign: Grounding Mathematics Education

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 137-152

  Radford, Luis ^a  

^a LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

activity; cultural semiotics; gestures; Kantian and Piagetian epistemology; mediated action; phenomenology; schema

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747630330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24270-8_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Adorno, T. W. (2001). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2001). From Body Motion to Algebra through Graphing. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference, The University of Melbourne, Australia, Vol. 1, 33-40.
3. Beth, E., W., & Piaget, J. (1966). Mathematical Epistemology and Psychology. The Netherlands: Reidel.
4. Biagioli, M. (1993). Galileo, Courtier. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
5. Brunschvicg, L. (1922). L'expérience humaine et la causalité physique. Paris: Alcan.
6. Buck-Morss, S. (1975). Socio-Economic Bias in Piaget's Theory and Its Implications for Cross-Culture Studies. Human Development 18, 35-49.
7. Chiurazzi, G. (1990). Schématisme et modalité: La doctrine kantienne du schématisme comme thématisation analogico- expérimentale de la connaissance. Kant Studien 91.2, 146-164.
8. Daval, R. (1957). La métaphysique de Kant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
9. Galileo, G. (1638). Two New Sciences (translated by S. Drake, 1989). Toronto: Wall & Thomson.
10. Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, Language, Thought (translated by A. Hofstadter). New York: Harper & Row.
11. Hooper, J. (Ed.) (1991). Peirce on signs. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
12. Husserl, E. (1961). Recherches Logiques (Recherches I et II). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
13. Kant, I. (1781, 1787/1929). Critique of Pure Reason (translated by Norman Kemp Smith). New York: St. Marin's Press (second printing, 1965).
14. Kant, I. (1790). The Critique of Judgement (translated by James Creed Meredith), retrieved from: http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/aut/
15. Leibniz, G. W. (1949). New Essays concerning Human Understanding (translated from the 1705 text by A. G. Langley). La Salle, 111: The open Court.
16. Lektorsky, V. A. (1984). Subject, Object, Cognition. Moscow: Progress Publisher.
17. Leontiev, A. N. (1984). Activité, conscience, personnalité. Moscou: Éditions du Progrès.
18. Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in Mathematics Learning: A Challenge to the Radical Constructivist Paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27.2, 133-150.
19. Lotman, Y. (1990). Universe of the Mind. A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London/New York: I. B. Taurus.
20. Nichanian, M. (1979). La question générale du fondement: Écriture et temporalité. Thèse de Doctorat de troisième cycle de Philosophie. Strasbourg: Université des Lettres et sciences humaines de Strasbourg.
21. Otte, M. (1998). Limits of constructivism: Kant, Piaget and Peirce. Science & Education 7, 425-450.
22. Otte, M. (in press). Does mathematics have objects? In what sense? Synthese.
23. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions. Cambrigde: Cambrigde University Press, 47-87.
24. Peirce, C. S. (1966). Collected Papers, (Ed. by A. Burks), Vol. 8. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
25. Piaget, J. (1924). L'expérience humaine et la causalité physique. Journal de psychologie normal et pathologique 21, 586-607.
26. Piaget, J. (1968). La formation du symbole chez l'enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
27. Piaget, J. (1970a). Psychologie et épistémologie. Paris: Éditions Gonthier.
28. Piaget, J. (1970b). Genetic Epistemology. New York: W. W. Norton.
29. Piaget, J. (1972). Problèmes de psychologie géné tique. Paris: Denoël/Gonthier.
30. Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (Ed.) (1982). Théories du langage, théories de l'apprentissage: le débat entre Jean Piaget et Noam Chomsky. Paris: Seuil.
31. Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies. Paris: Armand Colin.
32. Rabardel, P. (1997). Activités avec instruments et dynamique cognitive du sujet. In C. Moro, B. Schneuwly, & M. Brassard (Eds.), Outils et signes. Perspectives actuelles de la théorie de Vygotski. Bern: Peter Lang, 35-49.
33. Radford, L. (2002a). The Object of Representations: Between Wisdom and Certainty. In F. Hitt (Ed.), Representations and Mathematics Visualization, Departamento de matemática educativa Cinvestav-IPN, Mexico, 219-240.
34. Radford, L. (2002b). The seen, the spoken and the written. A semiotic approach to the problem of objectification of mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics 22.2, 14-23.
35. Radford, L. (2003a). Gestures, speech and the sprouting of signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 51, 37-70.
36. Radford, L. (2003b). On Culture and Mind. A post-Vygotskian Semiotic Perspective, with an Example from Greek Mathematical Thought. In M. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger, & V. V. Cifarelli (Eds.), Educational Perspectives on Mathenuztics as Semiosis: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing. Ottawa: Legas Publishing, 49-79.
37. Radford, L., Demers, S., Guzman, J., & Cerulli, M. (2003). Calculators, graphs, gestures, and the production meaning. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27 Conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (PME27-PMENA25), Vol. 4, 55-62.
38. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Interaction or Intersubjectivity? A Reply to Lerman. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31.2, 191-209.
39. Vergnaud, G. (1985). Concepts et schèmes dans la théorie opératoire de la représentation. Psychologie française 30.3-4, 245-252.
40. Verillon, P. and Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and Artifacts: A Contribution to the Study of Thought in Relation to Instrumented Activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education 10, 77-101.