Methodology for the analysis of instructors' grading discrepancies in a laboratory course

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1053-1062

  Montero, Juan M ^a   San Segundo, Rubén ^a   MacÍas Guarasa, Javier ^a   De Córdoba, Ricardo ^a   Ferreiros, Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Automatic analysis of grades; Biases in assessment; Grading discrepancies; Massive laboratories; Project based learning; Software quality analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747622440     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. G. Solomon, Project-based learning: a primer. Technology and Learning, 23(6), 2003, pp. 20-27.
2. J. Macías-Guarasa, R. San-Segundo, J. M. Montero, J. Ferreiros and R. de Córdoba, Tools and strategies for improving massive PBL laboratories management. Frontiers in Education, 2005.
3. J. G. Harris. Journal of Engineering Education round table: Reflexions on the Grinter Report, J. Eng. Educ., 83(1), 1994, pp. 69-94.
4. G. R. Ryser, J. E. Beeler and C. M. McKenzie, Effects of a computer-supported intentional learning environment (CSILE) on students' self-concept, self-regulatory behavior, and critical thinking ability. J. Educational Computing Research, 13(4), 1995, pp. 375-385.
5. K. L. Chan, Statistical analysis of final year project marks in the computer engineering undergraduate program, IEEE Trans. Education, 44, 2001, pp. 258-261.
6. G. Engelhard, M. Davis and L. Hansche, Evaluating the accuracy of judgments obtained from item review committees, Appl. Meas. Education, 12, 1999, pp. 199-210.
7. Guide for Evaluator, Marie Curie Fellowships (Individual and Host), Eur. Commission, Brussels, Belgium 2000. ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/improving/docs/ mcf_guide_evaluators.pdf
8. R. C. Woods, Iterative processing algorithm to detect biases in assessments, IEEE Trans. Education, 46, pp. 133-141 (2003).
9. N. L. Seed, The Examination Algorithm, Univ. Sheffield, UK (1998).
10. D. S. Moore and G. P. McCabe, Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 3rd ed. pp. 632-633. Freeman, San Francisco, CA (1998).
11. J. English and P. Siviter, Experience with an automatically assessed course, Proc. 5th Annual SIGCSEISIGCUE ITiCSE Conf. Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 2000, pp. 168-171.
12. B. Cheang, A. Kurnia, A. Lim and W. C. Oon, On automated grading of programming assignments in an academic institution, Computers, 41, 2003, pp. 121-131.
13. A. Korhonen, L. Malmi, J. Nikander and P. Tenhunen. Interaction and Feedback in Automatically Assessed Algorithm Simulation Exercises, J. Information Technology Education, 2, 2003, pp. 241-255.
14. http://www.die.upm.es
15. http://www.etsit.upm.es
16. http://www.upm.es
17. R. San-Segundo, J. M. Montero, J. Macias-Guarasa, R. de Córdoba and J. Ferreiros, Automatic tools for diagnosis and feedback in a project based learning course. Frontiers in Education, 2005.