Clinical breast examination in a comprehensive breast cancer screening program: Contribution and cost

Radiology

Volumn 240, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 650-655

  Feigin, Kimberly N ^a   Keating, Delia M ^a   Telford, Patricia M ^a   Cohen, Michael A ^b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NURSE PRACTITIONER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33747588540     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2403051377     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(3 pt 1):344-346.
2. Breast cancer: duty of providers of mammography services to ascertain and provide clinical breast examination information. NY Pub. Health § 2404-B (2004).
3. Barton MB, Harris R, Fletcher SW. Does this patient have breast cancer? the screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? how? JAMA 1999;282(13):1270-1280.
4. Bobo JK, Lee NC, Thames SF. Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92(12):971-976.
5. Jatoi I. Screening clinical breast examination. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83(4):789-801.
6. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53(3):141-169.
7. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
8. Bassett L. Clinical practice guideline number 13: quality determinants of mammography. Publication no. 95-0632. Rockville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency For Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service, 1994.
9. Mahoney L, Csima A. Efficiency of palpation in clinical detection of breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 1982;127(8):729-730.
10. Oestreicher N, Lehman CD, Seger DJ, Buist DS, White E. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(2):428-432.
11. Newcomer LM, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, et al. Detection method and breast carcinoma histology. Cancer 2002;95(3):470-477.
12. Sickles EA. The subtle and atypical mammographic features of invasive lobular carcinoma. Radiology 1991;178(1):25-26.
13. Mendelson EB, Harris KM, Doshi N, Tobon H. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma: mammographic patterns with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153(2):265-271.
14. Wagner JL. Cost-effectiveness of screening for common cancers. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1997;16(3-4):281-294.
15. Friedenberg RM. Malpractice reform. Radiology 2004;231(1):3-6.
16. West RW, Sipe CY. The risks of being sued and how much is paid. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1(2):89-91.