A research review for librarians working with electronic serials and licensing agreements in the age of the Internet and distance education

The Bottom Line

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 113-120

  Miller, Lindsey ^a   Peters, Kimberly ^b   Pappano, Mary ^b   Manuel, Kate ^c  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

^b EG&G   (United States)

^c University of America   (United States)

Author keywords

Collection management; Contracts; Copyright; Distance learning; Higher education; Licenses; Serials

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986105114     PISSN: 0888045X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/08880459910286174     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. American Library Association, Association of College and Research Libraries (1998), “ACRL Guidelines for distance learning library services”, College and Research Libraries News, Vol. 59 No. 9, pp. 689-94.
2. Association of Research Libraries (1997), License Review and Negotiation: Building a Team-Based Institutional Process: An ARL Workshop on Licensing Electronic Information Resources, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
3. Branin, J.J. and Case, M. (1998), “Reforming scholarly publishing in the sciences: a librarian perspective”, Notices of the AMS, Vol. 45, pp. 475-86.
4. Brennan, P., Hersey, K. and Harper, G. (1997), Licensing Electronic Resources: Strategic and Practical Considerations for Signing Electronic Information Delivery Agreements, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
5. Davis, T.L. (1997), “License agreements in lieu of copyright: are we signing away our rights?”, Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 19-27.
6. DeLoughry, T.J. (1996), “Purchasing power: cost-sharing efforts help college libraries finance electronic acquisitions”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 62, pp. A21.
7. DMCA (1998), United States, 105th Congress, 2nd Session, Digital Millennium Copyright Act, October 8.
8. Duranceau, E.F. (1997), “Why you can't learn license negotiation in three easy lessons: a conversation with Georgia Harper, Office of General Counsel, University of Texas”, Serials Review, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 69-71.
9. Grycz, C. (1992), “Economic models for networked information”, Serials Review, Vol. 18 No. 1-2, pp. 11-18.
10. International Coalition of Library Consortia (no date), Statement of Current Perspective and Preferred Practices for the Selection and Purchase of Electronic Information, available at http://lsounix1.library.yale.edu/consortia/statement.html
11. Kascus, M. and Aguilar, W. (1988), “Providing library support to off-campus programs”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 29-37.
12. Keating, L.R., Reinke, C.E. and Goodman, J.A. (1993), “Electronic journal subscriptions”, Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, Vol. 17, Winter 1993, pp. 455-63.
13. Luther, J. (1998), “Full text journal subscriptions: an evolutionary process”, ARL Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters, and Academic Discussion Lists, available at http://www.arl.org:591/luther.html
14. Machovec, G.S. (1997), “Electronic journal market overview – 1997”, Serials Review, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 31-44.
15. McKay, S., Mouw, J.P., Kusma, T. (1998), “Partnering in a changing medium: the challenges of managing and delivering e-journals”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 34 No. 3/4, 295-9.
16. Moothart, T. (1996), “Providing access to e-journals through library home pages”, Serials Review, Vol. 22, Summer 1996, pp. 71-7.
17. Newton-Smith, C. (1992), “When the electronic journal comes to campus”, in Cook, B. (Ed.), The Electronic Journal: The Future of Serials-Based Information, Haworth, Binghamton, NY.
18. Okerson, A.S. and O'Donnell, J.J. (1995), Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads: A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing. An Internet Discussion about Scientific and Scholarly Journals and Their Future, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
19. Pikowsky, R.A. (1996), “Electronic journals as a potential solution to escalating serials costs’’, Serials Librarian, Vol. 32 No. 3/4, pp. 31-55.
20. Samuelson, P. (1996), “The copyright grab”, Wired, January, available at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.01/white.paper_pr.html
21. Slade, A. (1998), “Library services for distance learning: What librarians need to know!”, PNLA Quarterly, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 19-21.
22. Spink, A., Robins, D., Schamber, L. (1998), “Use of scholarly book reviews: implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 364-74.
23. Stephens, K. (1996), “The role of the library in distance learning: a review of UK, North American and Australian literature”, New Review of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 2, pp. 204-34.
24. Tagler, J. (1998), “Repackaging journal information for electronic delivery’’, available at http://educate1.lib.chalmers.se/IA/edcontents/paperorvine/tagler.html
25. United States, Information Infrastructure Task Force. Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1995), “Intellectual property and the national information infrastructure: the report of the working group on intellectual property rights”, available at http:// www.uspto.gov/Web/offices/com/doc/ipnii
26. United States, US Copyright Office (1999), a Report of the Register of Copyrights, “Report on copyright and digital distance education”, available at http:// lcWeb.loc.gov/copyright/cpypub/de_rprt.pdf
27. Varian, H.R. (1997), “The future of electronic journals”, available at http://arl.cni.org/scomm/scat.vavrian.html
28. Walther, J.H. (1999), “Negotiating strategies with library vendors”, The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 51-2.
29. Weston, B. (1999), Personal Interview.
30. Weston, B., Reinke, C.R., and Morgan, E.L. (1995), “Methods for collecting, processing, and providing access to electronic serials”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 25 No. 3/4, pp. 327-31.
31. Academic Press Partners with OCLC for Electronic Collections Online (1999), Available at http://www.oclc.org/oclc/new/10233rn36/app.htm
32. Balas, J. (1998), “Library consortia in the brave new online world’’, Computers in Libraries, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 42-4.
33. Bailey, C.W. (1992), “The coalition for networked information's acquisition-on-demand model: an exploration and critique” Serials Review, Vol. 18 No. 1-2, pp. 78-81.
34. Brown, D.J. (1996), Electronic Publishing and Libraries: Planning for the Impact and Growth to 2003, Bowker-Saur, London.
35. Cramer, M.D. (1994), “Licensing agreements: think before you act”, College and Research Libraries News, Vol. 55 No. 8, pp. 296-7.
36. Day, C. (1995), “Copyright, pricing and market power: the great journals debate”, Logos, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 39-42.
37. Demas, S. (1994), “Collection development for the electronic library: a conceptual and organizational model”, Library HiTech, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 71-80.
38. Demas, S., McDonald, P. and Lawrence, G. (1995), “The Internet and collection development: mainstreaming selection of electronic resources”, Library Resources and Technical Services, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 275-90.
39. Drake, M. (1992), “Buying articles in the future”, Serials Review, Vol. 18 No. 1-2, pp. 75-7.
40. Ebbinghouse, C. (1996), “Who gets the money? Copyright issues in electronic publishing’’, Searcher, Vol. 4 No. 3, p. 51.
41. Ebbinghouse, C. (1996), “Electronic pubs pricing in the Web era”, Information Today, Vol. 12 No. 8, pp. 39-46.
42. Elias, A.W. (1990), “Copyright, licensing agreements and gateways”, Online Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 225-37.
43. Esler, S.E. and Nelson, M.L. (1998), ‘‘Evolution of scientific and technical information distribution”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 82-91.
44. Fisher, J. (1996), “Traditional publishers and electronic journals”, in Peek, R.P. and Newby, G.B. (Eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Gasaway, L. (1999), “Digital Millennium Copyright Act: a mixed bag”, Information Outlook, Special Libraries Association, pp. 14-16.
46. Guernsey, L. (1999), “California State U. tries to create a new way to buy on-line journals”, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 45 No. 20, p. A18.
47. Jacso, P. (1993), “A proposal for database ‘nutrition and ingredient’ labeling”, Database, Vol. 16, pp. 7-9.
48. Jones, D.H. (1998), “Electronic publishing: the library's view”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 34 No. 1/2, pp. 189-95.
49. Kaser, R.T. (1997), “From publishing continuum to interactive exchange: the evolution of the scholarly communication process”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 30 No. 3/4, pp. 55-71.
50. Kling, R. and Lamb, R. (1996), “Analyzing alternate visions of electronic publishing and digital libraries”, in Peek, R.P. and Newby, G.B. (Eds), Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic Frontier, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
51. Machovec, G.S. (1997), “Muddy waters bring the library blues and enhanced electronic access to journals”, Serials Review, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 79-82.
52. MacKie-Mason, J.K. and Riveros, J.F. (1997), Economics and Electronic Access to Scholarly Information, available at http://ksgwww.harvard.edu/iip/econ/mason.html
53. Mahon, J.V. (1996), “A commentary on proposals for copyright protection on the National Information Infrastructure: an analysis of proposed copyright changes and their impact on copyright's public benefits”, Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal, Vol. 22, p. 233.
54. Odlyzko, A. (1994/1995), Tragic Loss or Good Riddance? The Impending Demise of Traditional Scholarly Journals, available at http://www.research.att.com/∼amo/ doc/tragic.loss.html
55. Okerson, A. (1991), “The electronic journal: what, whence and when?”, Public Access Computer Systems Review, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 5-24.
56. Parang, E. and Saunders, L. (1994), Electronic Journals in ARL Libraries: Policies and Procedures, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC.
57. Peek, R., Pomerantz, J. and Paling, S. (1998), “The traditional scholarly journal publishers legitimize the Web”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 49 No. 11, pp. 983-9.
58. Prior, A. (1997), “Managing electronic serials: the development of a subscription agent's service”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 32 No. 3/4, pp. 57-65.
59. Rabine, J. and Rich, L. (1998), “Managing electronic journals in times of change”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 34 No. 3/4, pp. 279-83.
60. Rosenblatt, B. (1997), “Solving the dilemma of copyright protection online”, Journal of Electronic Publishing, Vol. 3 No. 2, available at http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-02/doi.html
61. Rowland, F. (1996), “Electronic journals: delivery, use and access”, IFLA Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 226-8.
62. Stefik, M. and Giuliana, L. (1997), “Libraries and digital property rights”, in European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology in Digital Libraries, Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: First European Conference, ECDL, ‘97, Pisa, Italy, September 1-3, 1997, Proceedings, Springer, Berlin, pp. 1-10.
63. Strangelove, M. (1996), “Current and future trends in network-based electronic journals and publishing”, in Saunders, L.M. (Ed.), The Evolving Virtual Library: Visions and Case Studies, Information Today, Medford, NJ.