Latent structure of the Test of Everyday Attention in a non-clinical Chinese sample

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 477-485

  Chan, Raymond C K ^a,b   Lai, M K ^c   Robertson, Ian H ^d  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^d TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Attention; Confirmatory factor analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SIMULATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDITY;

EID: 33747475244     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bate A.J., Mathias J.L., and Crawford J.R. Performance on the Test of Everyday Attention and standard tests of attention following severe traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologists 15 (2001) 405-422
2. Bentler P.M. Comparative fit indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990) 238-246
3. Chan R.C.K. Attentional deficits in patients with closed head injuries: A further study to the discriminative validity of the Test of Everyday Attention. Brain Injury 14 (2000) 227-236
4. Chan R.C.K. Attentional deficits in patients with post-concussion symptoms: A componential perspective. Brain Injury 15 (2001) 71-94
5. Chan R.C.K. Attentional deficits in patients with persisting postconcussive complaints: General deficit or specific component deficits?. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 24 (2002) 1081-1093
6. Chan R.C.K., Hoosain R., and Lee T.M.C. Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of the test of everyday attention among normal Hong Kong Chinese: A preliminary report. Clinical Rehabilitation 16 (2002) 900-909
7. Chan R.C.K., Hoosain R., Lee T.M.C., Fan Y.W., and Fong D.T.S. Are there subtypes of attentional deficits in patients with persisting postconcussive complaints? A cluster analytical study. Brain Injury 17 (2003) 131-148
8. Chan R.C.K., and Lai M.K. Latent structure of the Test of Everyday Attention: Convergent evidence from patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 20 (2006) 653-659
9. Chan R.C.K., Lee T.M.C., and Hoosain R. Validation of the Cantonese Version of Test of Everyday Attention: A study on factor structure. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 14 (1999) 715-716
10. Chan R.C.K., Robertson I.H., and Crawford J.R. An application of individual subtest scores calculation in the Cantonese version of the Test of Everyday Attention. Psychological Reports 93 (2003) 1275-1282
11. Cohen R.M., Semple W.E., Gross M., Holcom H.J., Dowling S., and Nordahl T.E. Functional localization of sustained attention. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioural Neurology 1 (1988) 3-20
12. Floyd F.J., and Widamen K.F. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment 7 (1995) 286-299
13. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., and Black W.C. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 5th ed. (1998), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
14. Hu L., and Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1999) 1-55
15. Jöreskog K.G., and Sörbom D. Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language (1999), Scientific Software, Chicago
16. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Ed.) (1998), Guilford Press, New York
17. Manly T., Anderson V., Nimmo-Smith I., Turner A., Watson P., and Robertson I.H. The differential assessment of Children's attention: The test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-Ch), normal sample and ADHD performance. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines 42 (2001) 1065-1081
18. Manly T., Robertson I.H., Anderson V., and Nimmo-Smith I. The Test of Everyday Attention for Children (TEA-CH) (1999), Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds
19. Mirsky A.F., Anthony B.J., Duncan C.C., Aheam M.B., and Kellam S.G. Analysis of the elements of attention: A neuropsychological approach. Neuropsychology Review 2 (1991) 109-145
20. Pardo J.V., Fox P.T., and Raichle M.E. Localization of a human system for sustained attention by Positron Emission Tomography. Nature 349 (1991) 61-64
21. Posner M.I., and Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 13 (1990) 25-42
22. Posner M.I., and Raichle M.E. Images of mind (1994), Scientific American Library, NY, America
23. Robertson I.H., Ward T., Ridgeway V., and Nimmo-Smith I. The Test of Everyday Attention (1994), Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds
24. Robertson I.H., Ward T., Ridgeway V., and Nimmo-Smith I. The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2 (1996) 525-534
25. Sohlberg M.M., and Mateer C.A. Introduction to cognitive rehabilitation: Theory and practice (1989), The Guilford Press, New York
26. Sohlberg M.M., and Mateer C.A. Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach (2001), The Guildford Press, New York
27. Sohlberg M.M., McLaughlin K., Pavese A., Heidrich A., and Posner M. Evaluation of attention processing training and brain injury education in persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 22 (2000) 656-676
28. Strauss M.E., Thompson P., Adams N.L., Redline S., and Burant C. Evaluation of a model of attention with confirmatory factor analysis. Neuropsychology 14 (2000) 201-208
29. Sturm W., Willmes K., Orgass B., and Hartje W. Do specific attention deficits need specific training?. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 7 (1997) 81-103
30. Stuss D.T., and Benson D.F. The frontal lobes (1986), Raven Press, New York
31. Tanaka J.S. How big is big enough? Sample size considerations and goodness of fit in structural equation modelling with latent variables. Child Development 58 (1987) 134-146
32. Toit S., Toit M., Joreskog K.G., and Sorbom D. Interactive LISREL user guide (1999), Scientific Software International, Chicago
33. Van Zomeren A.H., and Brouwer W.H. Clinical neuropsychology of attention (1994), Oxford University Press, New York
34. Wilkins A.J., Shallice T., and McCarthy R. Frontal lesions and sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 25 (1987) 359-365
35. Yamaguchi S., Tsuchiya H., and Kobayashi S. Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visual attention. Brain 117 (1994) 553-562