Temporal aggregation of an estar process: Some implications for purchasing power parity adjustment

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 655-668

  Paya, Ivan ^a   Peel, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747474400     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: 10991255     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.860     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Baum CF, Barkoulas JT, Caglayan M. 2001. Nonlinear adjustment to purchasing power parity in the post-Bretton Woods era. Journal of International Money and Finance 20: 379-399.
2. Berka M. 2002. General equilibrium model of arbitrage, trade and real exchange rate persistence. Mimeo, University of British Columbia.
3. Dumas B. 1992. Dynamic equilibrium and the real exchange rate in a spatially separated world. Review of Financial Studies 5: 153-180.
4. Eitrheim O, Terasvirta T. 1996. Testing the adequacy of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Econometrics 74: 59-75.
5. Gallant AR, Rossi PE, Tauchen G. 1993. Nonlinear dynamic structures. Econometrica 61: 871-908.
6. Granger CWJ. 1991. Developments in the nonlinear analysis of economic series. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 93: 263-272.
7. Granger CWJ, Lee TH. 1993. The effect of aggregation on nonlinearity. In Advances in Statistical Analysis and Statistical Computing, Roberta Mariano (ed.). Vol. 3, JAI Press Inc.
8. Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A. 2003. Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics 112: 359-379.
9. Kilian L, Taylor MP. 2003. Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk for exchange rates? Journal of International Economics 60: 85-107.
10. Kilian L, Zha T. 2002. Quantifying the uncertainty about the half-life of deviations from PPP. Journal of Applied Econometrics 17: 107-125.
11. Kiliç R. 2003. A testing procedure for a unit root in the STAR model. Working Paper, School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology.
12. Koop G, Pesaran MH, Potter SM. 1996. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics 74: 119-147.
13. Lothian JR, Taylor MP. 1996. Real exchange rate behavior: the recent float from the perspective of the past two centuries. Journal of Political Economy 104: 488-509.
14. Lothian JR, Taylor MP. 2004. Real exchange rates behavior: the recent float from the perspective of the past two centuries: how important is the Harrod-Balassa-Samuelson effect? CRIF Working Paper No. 04001.
15. Michael P, Nobay AR, Peel DA. 1997. Transactions costs and nonlinear adjustment in real exchange rates: an empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy 105: 862-879.
16. Murray C, Papell D. 2002. The purchasing power parity persistence paradigm. Journal of International Economics 56: 1-19.
17. Ozaki T. 1985. Nonlinear time series models and dynamical systems. In Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 5, Hannan EJ, Krishnaiah PR, Rao MM (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam; 25-83.
18. Paya I, Peel DA. 2003. On the relationship between nominal exchange rates and domestic and foreign prices. Mimeo, Cardiff Business School.
19. Paya I, Peel DA. 2004a. An analysis of the small sample properties on nonlinear estimates. Mimeo Lancaster University.
20. Paya I, Peel DA. 2004b. Nonlinear PPP under the gold standard. Southern Economic Journal 71: 302-313.
21. Paya I, Peel DA. 2004c. A new analysis of the determinants of the real dollar-sterling exchange rate: 1871-1994. Mimeo, Cardiff Business School.
22. Paya I, Peel DA. 2004d. Temporal aggregation of an ESTAR process: some implications for purchasing power parity adjustment. Mimeo, Lancaster University.
23. Paya I, Venetis IA, Peel DA. 2003. Further evidence on PPP adjustment speeds: the case of effective real exchange rates and the EMS. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65: 421-438.
24. Taylor AM. 2001. Potential pitfalls for the purchasing power parity puzzle? Sampling and specification biases in mean-reversion tests of the law of one price. Econometrical 69: 473-498.
25. Taylor MP, Peel DA, Sarno L. 2001. Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: toward a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles. International Economic Review 42: 1015-1042.
26. Terasvirta T. 1994. Specification, estimation and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 208-218.
27. Van Dijk D, Franses PH, Boswijk PH. 2000. Asymmetric and common absorption of shocks in nonlinear autoregressive models. Econometric Institute Research Report EI2000-01/A.
28. Venetis IA, Paya I, Peel DA. 2002. Do real exchange rates 'mean revert' to productivity? A nonlinear approach. Mimeo, Cardiff Business School.