Nonlinear purchasing power parity under the Gold Standard

Southern Economic Journal

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 302-313

  Paya, Ivan ^a   Peel, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 8344261538     PISSN: 00384038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4135293     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Acosta, Aparicio F.M., and Clive W.J. Granger. 1995. A linearity test for near-unit root time series. Discussion Paper No. 95-12, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
2. Bai, Jushan, and Pierre Perron. 1998. Estimation and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66:47-78.
3. Balassa, Bela. 1964. The purchasing-power parity doctrine: A reappraisal. Journal of Political Economy 72:584-96.
4. Berka, Martin. 2002. General equilibrium model of arbitrage trade and real exchange rate persistence. Unpublished paper, University of British Columbia.
5. Byers, David, and David A. Peel. 2003. A nonlinear time series with misleading linear properties. Applied Economics Letters 10:47-51.
6. Canzoneri, Matthew B., Robert E. Cumby, and Behzad T. Diba. 1996. Relative labor productivity and the real exchange rate in the long run: Evidence for a panel of OECD countries. Journal of International Economics 47:245-66.
7. Chinn, Menzie, and Louis Johnston. 1996. Real exchange levels, productivity and demand shocks: Evidence from a panel of 14 countries. NBER Working Paper No. 5709.
8. Cook, Chris, and John Stevenson. 1998. Longman handbook of modern European history 1763-1997. 3rd edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
9. Diebold, Francis X., Steven Husted, and Mark Rush. 1991. Real exchange rates under the gold standard. Journal of Political Economy 99:1252-71.
10. Dumas, Bernard. 1992. Dynamic equilibrium and the real exchange rate in a spatially separated world. Review of Financial Studies 5:153-80.
11. Eitrheim, Oyvind, and Timo Terasvirta. 1996. Testing the adequacy of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Econometrics 74:59-75.
12. Froot, Kenneth A., and Kenneth Rogoff. 1995. Perspectives on PPP and long-run real exchange rates. In Handbook of international economics. Volume 3, edited by G.M. Grossman and K. Rogoff. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1647-87.
13. Granger, Clive W.J., and Timo Terasvirta. 1999. Ocasional structural breaks and long memory. Discussion Paper No. 98-03, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
14. Hegwood, Natalie D., and David H. Papell. 2002. Purchasing power parity under the Gold Standard. Southern Economic Journal 69:72-91.
15. Koop, Gary, Hashem Pesaran, and Simon M. Potter. 1996. Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics 74:119-41.
16. Lothian, James R., and Mark P. Taylor. 1996. Real exchange rate behavior: The recent float from the perspective of the past two centuries. Journal of Political Economy 104:488-507.
17. Michael, Panos, Robert Nobay, and David A. Peel. 1997. Transactions costs and nonlinear adjustment in real exchange rates: An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy 105:862-79.
18. Newey, Whitney, and Kenneth West. 1987. A simple positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703-8.
19. O'Connell, Paul, and Shang-Jin Wei. 1997. The bigger they are, the harder they fall: How price differences between U.S. cities are arbitraged. NBER Working Paper No. 6089.
20. Ozaki, Tohru. 1985. Nonlinear time series models and dynamical systems. In Handbook of statistics V, edited by E.J. Hannan, P.R. Krishnaiah, and M.M. Rao. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 25-83.
21. Paya, Ivan, and David A. Peel. 2003. Temporal aggregation of an ESTAR process: Some implications for PPP adjustments. Unpublished paper, Cardiff Business School.
22. Paya, Ivan, Ioannis A. Venetis, and David A. Peel. 2003. Further evidence on PPP adjusment speeds: The case of effective real exchange rates and the EMS. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65:421-38.
23. Peel, David A., and Ioannis A. Venetis. 2002. Purchasing power parity over two centuries: Trends and non-linearity. Applied Economics 35:609-17.
24. Perron, Pierre, and Timothy J. Vogelsang. 1992. Nonstationarity and level shifts with an application to purchasing power parity. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10:301-20.
25. Pippenger, Michael K., and Gregory Goering. 1993. A note on the empirical power of unit root tests under threshold processes. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 55:473-81.
26. Rogoff, Kenneth. 1996. The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34:647-68.
27. Samuelson, Paul. 1964. Theoretical notes on trade problems. Review of Economics and Statistics 46:145-54.
28. Sercu, Piet, Raman Uppal, and C. Van Hull. 1995. The exchange rate in the presence of transactions costs: Implications for tests of purchasing power parity. Journal of Finance 50:1309-19.
29. Taylor, Alan M. 2001. Potential pitfalls for the purchasing power parity puzzle? Sampling and specification biases in mean-reversion tests of the law of one price. Econometrica 69:473-98.
30. Taylor, Mark P., David A. Peel, and Lucio Sarno. 2001. Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: Toward a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles. International Economic Review 42:1015-42.
31. Terasvirta, Timo. 1994. Specification, estimation and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89:208-18.
32. Tse, Yi. 2001. Index arbitrage with heterogeneous investors: A smooth transition error correction analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance 25:1829-55.
33. Venetis, Joannis A., Ivan Paya, and David A. Peel. 2002. Do real exchange rate "mean revert" to productivity? A nonlinear approach. Unpublished paper, Cardiff Business School.