Morphological differentiation following experimental bottlenecks in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Nymphalidae)

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 107-115

  Saccheri, Ilik J ^a   Nichols, Richard A ^b   Brakefield, Paul M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Genetic drift; Genetic variance; Lepidoptera; Wing pattern

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; ECOMORPHOLOGY; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION BOTTLENECK;

BICYCLUS ANYNANA; NYMPHALIDAE; SATYRINAE;

EID: 33747376446     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00662.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Beldade P, Brakefield PM, Long AD. 2002. Contribution of Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots. Nature 415: 315-318.
2. Brakefield PM. 1984. The ecological genetics of Maniola jurtina and other butterflies. In: Vane-Wright RI, Ackery PR, eds. The biology of butterflies. London: Academic Press, 167-190.
3. Brakefield PM. 1989. The variance in genetic diversity among subpopulations is more sensitive to founder effects or bottlenecks than is the mean: a case study. In: Fontdevila A, ed. Evolutionary biology of transient unstable populations. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 145-161.
4. Brakefield PM. 1990. Genetic drift and patterns of diversity among colour-polymorphic populations of the homopteran Philaenus spumarius in an island archipelago. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 39: 219-237.
5. Bryant EH, Combs LM, McCommas SA. 1986a. Morphometric differentiation among experimental lines of the housefly in relation to a bottleneck. Genetics 114: 1213-1223.
6. Bryant EH, McCommas SA, Combs LM. 1986b. The effect of an experimental bottleneck upon quantitative genetic variation in the housefly. Genetics 114: 1191-1211.
7. Bryant ED, Meffert LM. 1996. Morphometric differentiation in serially bottlenecked populations of the housefly. Evolution 50: 935-940.
8. Creed ER, Ford EB, McWhirter KG. 1964. Evolutionary studies on Maniola jurtina: the Isles of Scilly, 1958-87. Heredity 19: 471-488.
9. Dobzhansky T, Pavlovsky O. 1957. An experimental study of the interaction between genetic drift and natural selection. Evolution 11: 311-319.
10. Dowdeswell WH, Ford EB. 1953. The influence of isolation on variability in the butterfly Maniola jurtina. Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology 7: 254-273.
11. Dowdeswell WH, Ford EB, McWhirter KG. 1960. Further studies on the evolution of Maniola jurtina in the Isles of Scilly. Heredity 14: 333-364.
12. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Burnt Mill, Harlow: Longman.
13. Fischer K, Bot ANM, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ. 2003. Fitness consequences of temperature-mediated egg size plasticity in a butterfly. Functional Ecology 17: 803-810.
14. Ford EB. 1975. Ecological genetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
15. Grant PR, Grant BR. 1995. The founding of a new population of Darwin's finches. Evolution 49: 229-240.
16. Hill WG. 1972. Estimation of genetic change. I. General theory and design of control populations. Animal Breeding Abstracts 40: 1-15.
17. Jones JS, Leith BH, Rawlings P. 1977. Polymorphism in Cepaea: a problem with too many solutions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8: 109-143.
18. Kimura M, Crow JF. 1963. The measurement of effective population number. Evolution 17: 279-288.
19. Lande R. 1980. Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. American Naturalist 116: 463-479.
20. Le Boulengé E, Legendre P, De Le Court C, Le Boulengé- Nguyen P, Languy M. 1996. Microgeographic morphological differentiation in muskrats. Journal of Mammology 77: 684-701.
21. Lopez-Fanjul C, Fernandez A, Toro MA. 1999. The role of epistasis in the increase in the additive genetic variance after population bottlenecks. Genetical Research 73: 45-59.
22. López-Fanjul C, Fernández A, Toro MA. 2002. The effect of epistasis on the excess of the additive and nonadditive variances after population bottlenecks. Evolution 56: 865-876.
23. López-Fanjul C, Fernández A, Toro MA. 2003. The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence. Genetics 164: 1627-1633.
24. Lynch M. 1988. Design and analysis of experiments on random drift and inbreeding depression. Genetics 120: 791-807.
25. Naciri-Graven Y, Goudet J. 2003. The additive genetic variance after bottlenecks is affected by the number of loci involved in epistatic interactions. Evolution 57: 706-716.
26. van Oosterhout C, Brakefield PM, Kooi RE. 1993. Phenotypic plasticity and life history traits in selection lines of Bicyclus anynana. Proceedings of the Section Experimental and Applied Entomology of the Netherlands Entomological Society 4: 163-168.
27. Oxford GS. 1989. Genetics and distribution of black spotting in Enoplognatha ovata (Araneae: Theridiidae), and the role of intermittent drift in population differentiation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 36: 111-128.
28. Rice WR, Hostert EE. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years. Evolution 47: 1637-1653.
29. Rich SS, Bell AE, Miles DA, Wilson SP. 1984. An experimental study of genetic drift for two quantitative traits in Tribolium. Journal of Heredity 75: 191-195.
30. Saccheri IJ. 1995. An experimental study of the effects of population bottlenecks on genetic variation and fitness in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Unpubl. thesis, University of London.
31. Saccheri IJ, Brakefield PM, Nichols RA. 1996. Severe inbreeding depression and rapid fitness rebound in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyridae). Evolution 50: 2000-2013.
32. Saccheri IJ, Nichols RA, Brakefield PM. 2001. Effects of bottlenecks on quantitative genetic variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Genetical Research 77: 167-181.
33. Saccheri IJ, Wilson IJ, Nichols RA, Bruford MW, Brakefield PM. 1999. Inbreeding of bottlenecked butterfly populations: estimation using the likelihood of changes in marker allele frequencies. Genetics 151: 1053-1063.
34. Shorrocks B. 1978. The genesis of diversity. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
35. Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1981. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Waddington CH. 1957. The strategy of genes. London: Allen & Unwin.
37. Whitlock MC. 1992. Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization, and the genetic variance among populations. The American Naturalist 139: 952-970.
38. Windig JJ. 1993. The genetic background of plasticity in wing pattern of Bicyclus butterflies. Unpubl. thesis, University of Leiden.
39. Windig JJ, Brakefield PM, Reitsma N, Wilson JGM. 1994. Seasonal polyphenism in the wild: survey of wing patterns in five species of Bicyclus butterflies in Malawi. Ecological Entomology 19: 285-298.
40. Wright S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 323-354.
41. Zhang XS, Wang JL, Hill WG. 2004. Redistribution of gene frequency and changes of genetic variation following a bottleneck in population size. Genetics 167: 1475-1492.