Field cricket species differences in the temporal patterns of long-distance mate attraction signals

Ethology

Volumn 112, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 850-857

  Bertram, Susan M ^a   Bowen, Mia ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRICKET; MATE ATTRACTION; MATE LOCATION; SIGNAL; TEMPORAL VARIATION;

GRYLLINAE; GRYLLUS RUBENS;

EID: 33747358404     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01234.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen, G. R. 1998: Diel calling activity and field survival of the bushcricket, Sciarasaga quadrata (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): a role for sound-locating parasitic flies? Ethology 104, 645-660.
2. Andersson, M. 1986: Evolution of condition dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40, 804-816.
3. Andersson, M. B. 1994: Sexual Selection. Princeton New Jersey Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Bertram, S. M. 1999: Understanding intrapopulation variation in the mating behavior of a field cricket. Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
5. Bertram, S. M. 2000: The influence of age and size on temporal mate signaling behaviour. Anim. Behav. 60, 333-339.
6. Bertram, S. M. 2002a: The influence of rearing and monitoring environment on temporal mate signaling patterns in the field cricket, Gryllus texensis. J. Insect Behav. 15, 127-137.
7. Bertram, S. M. 2002b: Temporally fluctuating selection of sex-limited signaling traits in the Texas field cricket, Gryllus texensis. Evolution 56, 1831-1839.
8. Bertram, S. M. & Johnson, L. 1998: An electronic technique for monitoring the temporal aspects of acoustic signals of captive organisms. BioAcoustics 9, 107-118.
9. Bertram, S. M. & Warren, P. 2005: Tradeoffs in signalling components differ with signalling effort. Anim. Behav. 70, 477-484.
10. Bertram, S. M., Berrill, M. & Nol, E. 1996: Male mating success and variation in chorus attendance within and among breeding seasons in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Copeia 1996, 729-734.
11. Bertram, S. M., Johnson, L., Clark, J. & Chief, C. 2004: An electronic acoustic recorder (EAR) for quantifying when, how much, and how loud individuals signal acoustically. Tech. Acoust. 20, 1-15.
12. Cade, W. H. 1991: Inter- and intraspecific variation in nightly calling duration in field crickets, Gryllus integer and G. rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). J. Insect Behav. 4, 185-194.
13. Cade, W. H. & Cade, E. S. 1992: Male mating success, calling and searching behavior at high and low-densities in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav. 43, 49-56.
14. Castellana, S., Rosso, A., Laoretti, F., Doglio, S. & Giacoma, C. 2000: Call intensity and female preferences in the European green toad. Ethology 106, 1129-1141.
15. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D. A. 1995: Fitness differences associated with calling behaviour in the two wing morphs of male sand crickets, Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 50, 1475-1481.
16. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D. A. 1998a: The contingency of fitness: an analysis of food restriction on the macroptery-reproduction trade-off in crickets. Anim. Behav. 56, 433-441.
17. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D. A. 1998b: The genetic basis of the trade-off between calling and wing morph in males of the cricket Gryllus firmus. Evolution 52, 1111-1118.
18. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. 1996: Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Prentice Hall, Harlow.
19. Galliart, P. L. & Shaw, K. C. 1996: The effect of variation in parameters of the male calling song of the katydid, Amblycorypha parvipennis (Orthoptera: Tettigonnidae) on female phonotaxis and phonoresponse. J. Insect Behav. 9, 841-855.
20. Given, M. 2002: Interrelationships among calling effort, growth rate, and chorus tenure in Bufo fowleri. Copeia 2002, 979-987.
21. Gray, D. A. & Eckhardt, G. 2001: Is cricket courtship song condition dependent? Anim. Behav. 62, 871-877.
22. Green, A. J. 2001: Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82, 1473-1483.
23. Hedrick, A. 1986: Female preference for male calling bout duration in a field cricket. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 73-77.
24. Higgins, L. A. & Waugaman, R. D. 2004: Sexual selection and variation: a multivariate approach to species-specific calls and preferences. Anim. Behav. 68, 1139-1153.
25. Holzer, B., Jacot, A. & Brinkhof, M. W. G. 2003: Condition-dependent signaling affects male sexual attractiveness in field crickets, Gryllus campestris. Behav. Ecol. 14, 353-354, 359, 355.
26. Houle, D. 1991: Genetic covariance of fitness correlates - what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45, 630-648.
27. Houle, D. 1992: Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130, 195-204.
28. Houle, D. 1998: How should we explain variation in the genetic variance of traits? Genetica 103, 241-253.
29. Huang, Y., Orti, G., Sutherlin, M., Duhachek, A. & Zera, A. J. 2000: Phylogenetic relationships of North American field crickets inferred from mitochondrial DNA data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 48-57.
30. Klappert, K. & Reinhold, K. 2003: Acoustic preference functions and sexual selection on the male calling song in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus. Anim. Behav. 65, 225-233.
31. Kolluru, G. R. 1999: Variation and repeatability of calling behavior in crickets subject to a phonotactic parasitoid fly. J. Insect Behav. 12, 611-626.
32. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998: Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
33. Mallard, S. & Barnard, C. 2004: Food stress, fluctuating asymmetry and reproductive performance in the gryllid crickets Gryllus bimaculatus and Gryllodes sigillatus. Behavior 141, 219-232.
34. Morrison, C., Hero, J. M. & Smith, W. P. 2001: Mate selection in Litoria chloris and Litoria xanthomera: females prefer smaller males. Austral Ecol. 26, 223-232.
35. Murphy, C. G. 1994: Chorus tenure of male barking tree-frogs, Hyla gratiosa. Anim. Behav. 48, 763-777.
36. Otte, D. & Cade, W. H. 2000: Gryllus texensis n. sp.: a widely studied field cricket (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) from the southern United States. Trans. Am. Entomol. Soc. 126, 117-123.
37. Prohl, H. 2003: Variation in male calling behavior and relation to male mating success in the strawberry poison frog (Dendrobates pumilio). Ethology 109, 273-290.
38. Roff, D. A. 1997: Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York.
39. Roff, D. A., Mostowy, S. & Fairbairn, D. J. 2002: The evolution of trade-offs: testing predictions on response to selection and environmental variation. Evolution 56, 84-95.
40. Roff, D. A., Crnokrak, P. & Fairbairn, D. J. 2003: The evolution of trade-offs: geographic variation in call duration and flight ability in the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 744-753.
41. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996: The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B - Biol. Sci. 263, 1415-1421.
42. Ryan, M. J. & Keddy-Hector, A. C. 1992: Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139, S4-S35.
43. Scheuber, H., Jacot, A. & Brinkhof, M. W. G. 2003: Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket, Gryllus campestris. Anim. Behav. 65, 721-727.
44. Schwartz, J. J. 1993: Male calling behavior, female discrimination and acoustic interference in the neotropical treefrog Hyla microcephala under realistic acoustic conditions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 401-414.
45. Snedden, W. A. & Greenfield, M. D. 1998: Females prefer leading males: relative call timing and sexual selection in katydid choruses. Anim. Behav. 56, 1091-1098.
46. Tarano, Z. & Herrera, E. A. 2003: Female preferences for call traits and male mating success in the neotropical frog Physalaemus enesefae. Ethology 109, 121-134.
47. Wagner, W. E. & Hoback, W. W. 1999: Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket. Anim. Behav. 57, 89-95.
48. Walker, T. J. 1974: Character displacement and acoustic insects. Am. Zool. 14, 1137-1150.
49. Walker, T. J. 1987: Wing dimorphism in Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80, 547-560.
50. Walker, T. J. 1998: Trilling field crickets in a zone of overlap (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllus). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 91, 175-184.
51. Webb, K. L. & Roff, D. A. 1992: The quantitative genetics of sound production in Gryllus firmus. Anim. Behav. 44, 823-832.
52. Zera, A. J. & Larsen, A. 2001: The metabolic basis of life history variation: genetic and phenotypic differences in lipid reserves among life history morphs of the wing-polymorphic cricket, Gryllus firmus. J. Insect Physiol. 47, 1147-1160.
53. Zera, A. J. & Rankin, M. A. 1989: Wing dimorphism in Gryllus rubens: genetic basis of morph determination and fertility differences between morphs. Oecologia 80, 249-255.
54. Zera, A. J., Borcher, C. A. & Gaines, S. B. 1993: Juvenile hormone degradation in adult wing morphs of the cricket, Gryllus rubens. J. Insect Physiol. 39, 845-856.