A stage-structured predator-prey model of Beddington-DeAngelis type

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1101-1129

  Liu, Shengqiang ^a   Beretta, Edoardo ^b  

^a XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF URBINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Beddington DeAngelis; Delay; Predator prey; Stage structure

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SYSTEM STABILITY;

BEDDINGTON-DEANGELIS; DELAY; PREDATOR-PREY; STAGE STRUCTURES;

ECOLOGY;

EID: 33747198005     PISSN: 00361399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/050630003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. W. AIELLO AND H. I. FREEDMAN, A time-delay model of single-species growth with stage structure, Math. Biosci., 101 (1990), pp. 139-153.
2. J. AL-OMARI AND S. GOURLEY, Stability and traveling fronts in Lotka-Volterra competition models with stage structure, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63 (2003), pp. 2063-2086.
3. R. ARDITI AND L. R. GINZBURG, Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: Ratio-dependence, J. Theoret. Biol., 1989 (139), pp. 311-326.
4. P. A. ABRAMS AND C. J. WALTERS, Invulnerable prey and the statics and dynamics of predatorprey interaction, Ecology, 1996 (77), pp. 1125-1133.
5. P. A. ABRAMS AND L. R. GINZBURG, The nature of predation: Prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? TREE, 2000 (15), pp. 337-341.
6. J. R. BEDDINOTON, Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency, J. Animal Ecol., 44 (1975), pp. 331-340.
7. E. BERETTA AND Y. KUANG, Global analysis in some delayed ratio-dependent predator-prey systems, Nonlinear Anal., 32 (1998), pp. 381-408.
8. E. BERETTA AND Y. KUANG, Geometric stability switch criteria in delay differential systems with delay dependent parameters, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 33 (2002), pp. 1144-1165.
9. R. S. CANTRELL AND C. COSNER, On the dynamics of predator-prey models with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 257 (2001), pp. 206-222.
10. R. S. CANTRELL, C. COSNER, AND S. G. RUAN, Intraspecific interference and consumer-resource dynamics, Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 4 (2004), pp. 527-546.
11. C. COSNER, D. L. DEANGELIS, J. S. AULT, AND D. B. OLSON, Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators, Theoret. Popul. Biol., 56 (1999), pp. 65-75.
12. P. H. CROWLEY AND E. K. MARTIN, Functional responses and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population, J. North American Benthological Soc., 8 (1989), pp. 211-221.
13. D. L. DEANGELIS, R. A. GOLDSTEIN, AND R. NEILL, A model for trophic interaction, Ecology, 56 (1975), pp. 881-892.
14. M. FAN AND Y. KUANG, Dynamics of a nonautonomous predator prey system with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 295 (2004), pp. 15-39.
15. S. A. GOURLEY AND Y. KUANG, A stage structured predator-prey model and its dependence on through-stage delay and death rate, J. Math. Biol., 49 (2004), pp. 188-200.
16. J. K. HALE AND P. WALTMAN, Persistence in infinite-dimensional systems, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 20 (1989), pp. 388-395.
17. M. P. HASSELL AND C. C. VARLEY, New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control, Nature, 223 (1969), pp. 1133-1137.
18. J. K. HALE AND S. V. LUNEL, Introduction to Functional Differential Equations, Appl. Math. Sci. 99, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
19. C. S. HOLLING, The components of predation as revealed by a study of small mammal predation of the European pine sawfly, Canad. Entomologist, 91 (1959), pp. 293-320.
20. C. S. HOLLING, Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism, Canad. Entomologist, 91 (1959), pp. 385-395.
21. S. B. Hsu, S. P. HUBBELL, AND P. WALTMAN, A contribution to the theory of competing predators, Ecological Monogr., 35 (1978), pp. 617-625.
22. S. B. Hsu, S. P. HUBBELL, AND P. WALTMAN, Competing predators, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 35 (1978), pp. 617-625.
23. Z. W. H WANG, Global analysis of the predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 281 (2003), pp. 395-401.
24. Z. W. HWANG, Uniqueness of limit cycles of the predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 290 (2004), pp. 113-122
25. Y. KUANG, Global stability of Gause-type predator-prey systems, J. Math. Biol., 28 (1990), pp. 463-474.
26. Y. KUANG, Delay Differential Equations with Applications in Population Dynamics, Academic Press, New York, 1993.
27. Y. KUANG AND E. BERETTA, Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator-prey system, J. Math. Biol., 36 (1998), pp. 389-406.
28. S. LIU, L. CHEN, G. LUO, AND Y. JIANG, Asymptotic behavior of competitive Lotka-Volterra system with stage structure, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 271 (2002), pp. 124-138.
29. S. LIU, L. CHEN, AND R. AGARWAL, Recent progress on stage-structured population dynamics, Math. Comput. Modelling, 36 (2002), pp. 1319-1360.
30. S. LIU, L. CHEN, AND G. LUO, Extinction and permanence in competitive stage structured system with time delays, Nonlinear Anal., 51 (2002), pp. 1347-1361.
31. S. LIU, L. CHEN, AND Z. LIU, Extinction and permanence in nonautonomous competitive system with stage structure, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 274 (2002), pp. 667-684.
32. S. LIU, M. KOUCHE, AND N. TATAR, Permanence and global asymptotic stability in a stage structured system with distributed delays, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 301 (2005), pp. 187-207.
33. Z. Liu AND R. YUAN, Stability and bifurcation in a delayed predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 296 (2004), pp. 521-537.
34. A. MARTIN AND S. RUAN, Predator-prey models with delay and prey harvesting, J. Math. Biol., 43 (2001), pp. 247-267.
35. L. OU, G. LUO, Y. JIANG, AND Y. LI, The asymptotic behaviors of a stage-structured autonomous predator-prey system with time delay, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 283 (2003), pp. 534-548.
36. Z. P. QIU, J. YU, AND Y. ZOU, The asymptotic behavior of a chemostat model with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response, Math. Biosci., 187 (2004), pp. 175-187.
37. J. D. REEVE, Predation and bark beetle longterm dynamics, Oecologia, 112 (1997), pp. 48-54.
38. G. RUXTON, W. S. C. GURNEY, AND A. DEROOS, Interference and generation cycles, Theoret. Population Biol. 42 (1992), pp. 235-253.
39. G. T. SKALSKI AND J. F. GILLIAM, Functional responses with predator interference: Viable alternatives to the Hailing type II model, Ecology, 82 (2001), pp. 3083-3092.
40. H. R. THIEME, Persistence under relaxed point-dissipativity (with application to an endemic model), SIAM J. Math. Anal., 24 (1993), pp. 407-435.
41. W. WANG, G. MULONE, F. SALEMI, AND V. SALONE, Permanence and stability of a stage-structured predator-prey model, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 262 (2001), pp. 499-528.