Healthy arguments for literacy in health

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-06-01, Issue , 2006, Pages 86-95

  Schulz, P J ^a   Rubinelli, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; PATIENT MONITORING;

ARGUMENTATION; MEDICAL CONSULTATION; ONTOLOGY; PHYSICIANS;

HEALTH CARE;

EID: 33747166694     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bachers, D.E., Haas, S.M. and Neidig, L. J. 2002. Satisfying the argumentative requirements for self-advocacy. In Van Eemeren F.H. ed. Advances in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam and Newport News: Sic Sat /Vale Press, 291-308.
2. Ballard-Reisch, D. S. 1990, A Model of Participative Decision Making for Physician-Patient Interaction. Health Communication 2:91-104.
3. Blair, A. 1992. Everyday argumentation from an Informal Logic Perspective. In Benoit, W., Hample, D. and Benoit, P. eds. Readings in argumentation. Berlin-New York: Foris Publication, 357-376.
4. Britten, N. 1995. Patients' Demands for Prescriptions in Primary Care. British Medical Journal 310:1084-1085.
5. Byrne, P.S. and Long, B.E.L. 1976. Doctors talking to patients. London: HMSO.
6. Dickinson, H. D. 1998. Evidence-Based Decision-Making: an Argumentative Approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 51:71-81.
7. Eddy, D. M. 1990. Anatomy of Decision, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 263:441-443.
8. Grasso, A., Cawscy, A. and Jones, R. 2000. 'Dialectical Argumentation to Solve Conflicts in Advice Giving: a Case Study in the Promotion of Healthy Nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53:1077-1115.
9. Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1958. Traité de l'Argumentation. La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
10. Quill, T. E. and Brody, H. 1996. Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy. Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice. Annals of Internal Medicine, 125 (9): 736-769.
11. Rigotti, E. and Greco, S. 2005: Argumentation. Forthcoming.
12. Rubinelli, S. and Schulz, P. 2006. Let's Me Tell you Why! When Argumentation in Doctor-Patient Interaction Makes a Difference. Forthcoming.
13. Sarangi, S. 2004. Towards a Communicative Mentality in Medical and Healthcare Practice. Editorial. Communication & Medicine. 1(1): 1-11.
14. Schulz, P. 2003. Effetti Mediatici sull'Interazione Medico-Paziente'. In Rubinelli, S. and Crivelli, B. eds. Televisione, Stampa e Internet tra Medico e Paziente. Special Issue of Tribuna Medica: 7-10.
15. Schulz, P. 2005. The Communication of Diagnostic Information by Doctors to Patients in the Consultation. In: Twohig P. & Kalitzkus, V. eds. Making sense of Health, Illness and disease. Forthcoming.
16. Searle, J. R. 2001. Rationality in Action. Cambridge, Mass-London: The MIT Press.
17. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1989. Healthy People 2010 Objectives: Draft for Public Comment. Washington, DC: U.S. DHHS, Office of Public Health and Science.
18. Upshur, R.E.G. and Colak, E. 2003. Argumentation and Evidence. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 24:283-299.
19. Van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R. and Snoeck Henkemans, F. 2002 Argumentation. Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwah and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
20. Van Eemeren F. and Grootendorst, R. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach, Cambridge: University Press.
21. Van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser. 2005. Strategic Manoeuvring. Studies in Communication Sciences. Special Issue on Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction: 23-34.
22. Waddell. G. 2004. Back Pain Revolution. Elsevier Limited. Edinburgh et alia: Elsevier Limited.
23. Walton, D. 2005. How to Evaluate Argumentation Using Schemes, Diagrams, Critical Questions and Dialogues. Studies in Communication Sciences. Special Issue on Argumentation in Dialogic Interaction: 51-74.