Pitfalls in lactate measurements at 3T

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 895-901

  Lange, T ^a   Dydak, U ^a   Roberts, T P L ^b   Rowley, H A ^c   Bjeljac, M ^d   Boesiger, Peter ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3T NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONACE IMAGING; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HUMAN; LACTIC ACIDOSIS; MELAS SYNDROME; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHANTOM; PREDICTION; SIGNAL DETECTION; BRAIN DISEASE; IMAGE QUALITY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METABOLISM;

LACTIC ACID;

BRAIN DISEASES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; LACTIC ACID; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 33747131017     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. de Graaf R. In Vivo NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Techniques. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 1998:53-57
2. Allen PS, Thompson RB, Wilman AH. Metabolite-specific NMR spectroscopy in vivo. NMR Biomed 1997;10:435-44
3. Yablonskiy DA, Neil JJ, Raichle ME, et al. Homonuclear J coupling effects in volume localized NMR spectroscopy: pitfalls and solutions. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:159-78
4. Kelley DAC, Lawrence LW, Star-Lack JM. Lactate detection at 3T: compensating J coupling effects with BASING. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:732-37
5. Star-Lack J, Spielman D, Adalsteinsson E, et al. In vivo lactate editing with simultaneous detection of choline, creatine, NAA, and lipid singlets at 1.5 T using PRESS excitation with applications to the study of brain and head and neck tumors. J Magn Reson 1998;133:243-54
6. Tran TK, Vigneron DB, Sailasuta N, et al. Very selective suppression pulses for clinical MRSI studies of brain and prostate cancer. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:23-33
7. Garwood M, DelaBarre L. The return to frequency sweep: designing adiabatic pulses for contemporary NMR. Magn Reson Med 2001;153:155-77
8. Schick F, Nagele T, Klose U, et al. Lactate quantification by means of PRESS spectroscopy: influence of refocusing pulses and timing scheme. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:309-19
9. 1N MR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 2001;152:203-13
10. Marshall I, Wild JA. Systematic study of the lactate line-shape in PRESS-localized proton spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:72-78
11. Thompson RB, Allen PS. Sources of variability in the response of coupled spins to the PRESS sequence and their potential impact on metabolite quantification. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:112-15
12. Slotboom J, Mehlkopf AF, Bovee WMMJ. The effects of frequency-selective RF pulses on J-coupled spin-1/2 systems. J Magn Reson 1994;108:38-50
13. Maudsley AA, Govindaraju V, Young K, et al. Numerical simulation of PRESS localized MR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 2005;173:54-63