In favour of forceps delivery;Pour le forceps

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 34, Issue 7-8, 2006, Pages 657-659

  Ducarme, G ^a   Luton, D ^b  

^a HÔPITAL JEAN VERDIER   (France)

^b HÔPITAL ROBERT DEBRÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Forceps delivery; Instrumental vaginal delivery; Maternal morbidity; Neonatal morbidity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH INJURY; BIRTHING POSITION; DYSTOCIA; FORCEPS DELIVERY; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; VAGINAL DELIVERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DELIVERY; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; FORCEPS; HUMAN; INJURY; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PERINEUM; PREGNANCY; TIME;

BIRTH INJURIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; PERINEUM; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33747066193     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.05.011     Document Type: Note

References (24)

1. Dupuis O., Moreau R., Silveira R., Dittmar A., Rudigoz R.-C., and Redarce T. Les forceps hier, aujourd'hui et demain. Une nouvelle classification des forceps. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 33 (2005) 980-985
2. Dupuis O., Silveira R., Redarce T., Dittmar A., and Rudigoz R.-C. Extraction instrumentale en 2002 au sein du réseau AURORE : incidence et complications néonatales graves. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 31 (2003) 920-926
3. Lurie S., Glezerman M., Baider C., and Sadan O. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction vs forceps. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 12 (2006) 1-3
4. Dupuis O., Dubuisson J., Moreau R., Sayegh I., Clément H.-J., and Rudigoz R.-C. Rapidité d'extraction respective des césariennes et des forceps réalisés en urgence. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris) 34 (2005) 789-794
5. Vacca A., Grant A., Wyatt G., and Chalmers I. Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 90 (1983) 1107-1112
6. Johanson R.B., Pusey J., Livera N., and Jones P. North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 96 (1989) 537-544
7. Bofill J.A., Rust O.A., Schorr S.J., Brown R.C., Martin R.W., Martin Jr. J.N., et al. A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps vs the M-cup vacuum extractor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 175 (1996) 1325-1330
8. Johanson R.B., and Menon R.K. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Databse Syst. Rev. 2 (2000) (CD000224)
9. Caughey A.B., Sandberg P.L., Zlatnik M.G., Thiet M.P., Parer J.T., and Laros R.K. Forceps compared with vacuum. Rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Obstet. Gynecol. 106 (2005) 908-912
10. Youssef R., Ramalingam U., Macleod M., and Murphy D.J. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery. BJOG 112 (2005) 941-945
11. Lurie S., Glezerman M., and Sadan O. Maternal and neonatal effects of forceps versus vacuum operative vaginal delivery. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 89 (2005) 293-294
12. Johanson R.B., Rice C., Doyle M., Arthur J., Anyanwu L., Ibrahim J., et al. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 100 (1993) 524-530
13. Sultan A.H., Kamm M.A., Hudson C.M., Thomas J.M., and Bartram C.I. Anal-sphincter disruption during vagnial delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 329 (1993) 1905-1911
14. Sultan A.H., Kamm M.A., Hudson C.M., and Bartram C.I. Third degree obstetric anal spincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 308 (1994) 887-891
15. Kearney R., Miller J.M., Ashton-Miller J.A., and DeLancey J.O. Obstetric factors associated with levator and muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 107 (2006) 144-149
16. Johanson R.B., Heycock E., Carter J., Sultan A., Walklate K., and Jones P. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow-up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 106 (1999) 544-549
17. MacArthur C., Glazener C., Wilson D., Lancashire R., Herbison P., and Grant A. Persistent urinary incontinence and delivery mode history: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG 113 (2006) 218-224
18. Handa V.L., Danielsen B.H., and Gilbert W.M. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet. Gynecol. 98 (2001) 225-230
19. Riethmuller D., Schaal J.P., and Maillet R. Ventouse obstétricale: un instrument moderne. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 29 (2001) 648-661
20. Moolgoaker A., Ahamed S., and Payne P. A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction. Obstet. Gynecol. 54 (1979) 299-309
21. Dupuis O., Silveira R., Dupont C., Mottolese C., Kahn P., Dittmar A., et al. Comparison of "instrument-associated" and "spontaneous" obstetric depressed skull fractures in a cohort of 68 neonates. Am. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 192 (2005) 165-170
22. Seidman D.S., Laor A., Gale R., Stevenson D.K., Mashiach S., and Danon Y.L. Long-term effects of vacuum and forceps deliveries. Lancet 237 (1991) 1583-1585
23. Nilsen S.T. Boys born by forceps and vacuum extraction examined at 18 years of age. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 63 (1984) 549-554
24. Attilakos G., Sibanda T., Winter C., Johnson N., and Darcott T. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device. BJOG 112 (2005) 1510-1515