Decision-to-deliver interval for forceps delivery and cesarean section: 137 Extractions for abnormal fetal heart rhythm during labor;Rapidité d'extraction respective des césariennes et des forceps réalisés en urgence: À propos de 137 extractions pour anomalies du rythme cardiaque fœtal en cours de travail

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 789-794

  Dupuis, O ^a   Dubuisson, J ^a   Moreau, R ^b   Sayegh, I ^a   Clement H J ^a   Rudigoz, R C ^a  

^a CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Decision to delivery interval; Forceps delivery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS HEART RATE; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNITY WARD; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

EID: 29444448634     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0368-2315(05)82955-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Helmy WH, Jolaoso AS, Ifaturoti OO, Afify SA, Jones MH. The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target? BJOG 2002; 109: 505-8.
2. Sayegh I, Dupuis O, Clement HJ, Rudigoz RC. Evaluating the decision-to-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 116: 28-33.
3. Faro MD, Windle WF. Transneuronal degeneration in brains of monkeys asphyxiated at birth. Exp Neurol 1969; 24: 38-53.
4. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 311-4.
5. Okunwobi-Smith Y, Cooke I, MacKenzie IZ. Decision to delivery intervals for assisted vaginal vertex delivery. Br J Obst Gynecol 2000; 107:467-71.
6. Bashore RA, Phillips WH, Brinkman CR. A comparison of the morbidity of midforceps and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1428-35.
7. Hagadorn-Freathy AS, Yeomans ER, Hankins GDV. Validation of the 1988 ACOG forceps classification system. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 356-60.
8. Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M et al. Birth simulator. Reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the ACOG Classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 868-74.
9. Tuffnell DJ, Wilkinson K, Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series. BMJ 2001; 322: 1330-3.
10. Schauberger CW, Rooney BL, Beguin EA, Schaper AM, Spindler J. Evaluating the thirty minute interval in emergency cesarean sections. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 179: 151-5.
11. Quinn AJ, Kilpatrick A. Emergency cesarean section during labour: response time and type of anaesthesia. Eur J Obstet 1994; 54: 25-9.
12. Vacca A, Grant A, Wyatt G, Chalmers I. Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 1107-12.
13. Johanson R, Pusey J, Livera N, Jones P. North Staffordshire/Wigan assisted delivery trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 537-44.
14. Bofill JA, Rust OA, Schorr SJ, Brown RC, Martin RW, Martin JN Jr et al. A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 1325-30.
15. MacKenzie IZ, Burns E. Randomised trial of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: 1. Clinical outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1062-7.
16. Johanson RB, Menon BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000, CD000224.
17. Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Schiano S, Connor KD. Neonatal acidosis and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 681-5.
18. Robertson PA, Laros RK, Zhao RL. Neonatal and maternal outcome in low-pelvic and midpelvic operative deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1436-44.