Adjustment to severe disability: Constructing and examining a cognitive and occupational performance model

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 201-207

  Schreuer, Naomi ^a   Rimmerman, Arie ^a   Sachs, Dalia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Adjustment; Cognitive; Occupational performance model; Severe disability; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADJUSTMENT; COGNITIVE; OCCUPATIONAL PERFORMANCE MODEL; SEVERE DISABILITY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; TECHNOLOGY;

HANDICAPPED PERSONS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OCCUPATION; POPULATION MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF ESTEEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL STUDY; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; WORK;

EID: 33747066118     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mrr.0000210053.40162.13     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ajzen L, Fishbein M (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 27:41-57.
2. Antonak RF, Livneh H (1991). A hierarchy of reactions to disability. Int J Rehabil Res 14:13-24.
3. Antonovsky A (1979). Health stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
4. Barnwell AM, Kavanagh DJ (1997). Prediction of psychological adjustment to multiple sclerosis. Soc Sci Med 45:411-418.
5. Baum C (1995). The contribution of occupation to function in persons with Alzheimer's disease. J Occup Sci: Australian 2:59-67.
6. Baum CM, Christiansen CH (2005). Person-environment-occupation- performance: an occupation-based framework for practice. In: Christiansen CH, Baum CM, Bass Haugen J (editors). Occupational therapy: performance participation, and well-being. 3rd ed. p. 653 Throfare: Slack.
7. Baum CM, Edwards D (2001). Activity Card Sort (ACS): test manual. St Louis: Washington University School of Medicine.
8. Bent N, Jones A, Molloy I, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A (2001). Factors determining participation in young adults with a physical disability: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil 15:552-561.
9. Blackwell TL, Leierer SJ, Haupt S, Kampitsis A (2003). Predictors of vocational rehabilitation return to work outcomes in workers compensation. Rehabil Couns Bull 46:108-114.
10. Caya ML, Liem S (1998). The role of sibling support in high-conflict families. Am J Orthopsychiatry 68:327-333.
11. Christiansen C, Clark F, Kielhofner J (1995). Position paper: occupation. American Occupational Therapy Association. Am J Occup Ther 49:1015-1028.
12. Day H, Jutai J,Woolrich W, Strong G (2001). The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil 23:400-404.
13. Desrosiers J, Malouin F, Bourbonnais D, Richards CL (2003). Arm and leg impairments and disabilities after stroke rehabilitation: relation to handicap. Clin Rehabil 17:666-673.
14. Dunn DS (1996). Well-being following amputation: salutary effects of positive meaning, optimism, and control. Rehabil Psychol 41:285-299.
15. Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Cross AH (1986). Mediating influences of social support: personal, family and child outcomes. Am J Ment Defic 4:403-417.
16. Groomes DAG, Leahy MJ (2002). The relationships among stress appraisal process, coping disposition, and level of acceptance of disability. Rehabil Couns Bull 46:12-23.
17. Jette AM, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT (2003). Are the ICF activity and participation dimensions distinct? J Rehabil Med 35:145-149.
18. Joinson AN (2004). Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication. Cyber Psychol Behav 7:472-478.
19. Jutai J (1999). Quality of life: an impact of assistive technology. Rehabil Eng 14:2-7.
20. Kendall E (2003). Predicting vocational brain injury: a test of a psychosocial theory. J Vocat Rehabil 19:31-45.
21. Kendall E, Terry DJ (1996). Psychosocial adjustment following close head injury: a model for understanding individual differences and predicting outcome. Neuropsychol Rehabil 6:101-132.
22. Krause JS, Kewman D, DeVito M, Maynard F, Cocker J, Roach MG, Ducharme S (1999). Employment after spinal cord injury: an analysis of cases from the Model Spinal Injury System. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1492-1500.
23. Lacharite C, Boutet M, Proulx R (1995). Intellectual disability and psychopathology: developmental perspective. Canada's Mental Health 43:2-8.
24. Law M (2002). Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther 56:640-649.
25. Lazarus RS, DeLongis A, Folkman S, Gurin R (1985). Stress and adaptational outcomes: The problem of confounded measures. Am Psychol 40:770-779.
26. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
27. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1993). Coping theory and research: past, present and future. Psychosom Med 55:237-247.
28. Liu C, McNeil JE, Greenwood R (2004). Rehabilitation outcomes after brain injury: disability measures or goal achievement? Clin Rehabil 18:398-404.
29. Livneh H, Antonack RF (1997). Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability. Gaithersburg: Aspen.
30. Livneh H, Wilson LM (2003). Coping strategies as predictors and mediators of disability-related variables and psychosocial adaptation. Rehabil Couns Bull 46:194-208.
31. Lund ML, Nygard L (2003). Incorporating of resisting assistive devices: different approaches to achieving desired occupational self-esteem. Occupation, Participation and Health, OTJR 23:67-74.
32. Lutz BJ, Bowers BJ (2003). Understanding how disability is defined and conceptualized in the literature. Rehabil Nurs 28:74-78.
33. Maes S, Laventhal H, de-Ridder DTD (1996). Coping with chronic disease. In: Zeidner M, Endler NS (editors). Handbook of coping: theory research and applications. New York: Wiley. pp. 221-251.
34. McCarthy CJ, Lambert RG, Brack G (1997). Structural model of coping, appraisal, and emotions after relationship breakup. J Couns Dev 76:53-54.
35. McColl MA, Skinner H (1995). Assessing inter-and interpersonal resources; social support and coping among adults with a disability. Disabil Rehabil Couns Bull 1:24-34.
36. McCubbin HI (editor) (1998). Stress, coping, and health in families: sense of coherence and resiliency. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
37. McGeary DD, Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Anagnostis C, Proctor TJ (2003). Gender-related differences in treatment outcomes for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Spine J 3:197-203.
38. National organization on Disability, The Harris Survey (2003). The State of the Union 2003 for Americans with disabilities. Available from http://www.nod.org. [Accessed 9 September 2005].
39. Navala-Puranen N, Seuri M, Simola A, Elo J (1999). Physically disabled at work: need for ergonomic interventions. J Occup Rehabil 9:225-236.
40. Nosek MA, Hughes RB (2003). Psychosocial issues of women with physical disabilities: the continuing gender debate. Rehabil Couns Bull 46:224-233.
41. Pearlin LI, Lieberman MA, Menaghan EG, Mullan JT (1981). The stress process. J Health Soc Behav 22:337-356.
42. Pearlin LI, Schooler C (1978). The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 19:2-21.
43. Rimmerman A, Schwartz H, Li-or N (2000). Disabled people in the changing Kibutz: characters and utilization of their rights. Social Security 57:167-182.
44. Rosenberg M (1965). Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES): a psychology test. In: Society and the adolescent self-image. P. 319 Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45. Rosenberg M (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
46. Sachs D, Josman N (2003). The Activity Card Sort: a factor analysis. Occupation, Participation and Health, OTJR 23:165-174.
47. Schwochau S, Blanck P (2003). Does the ADA disable the disabled? - More comments. Industrial Relations 42:67-77.
48. Shaw L, Polatajko H (2002). An application of the occupation competence model to organizing factors associated with return to work. Can J Occup Ther 69:158-167.
49. Skar RNL (2003). Peer and adult relationships of adolescents with disabilities. J Adolesc 26:635-649.
50. Soejima Y, Steptoe A, Nozoe S, Tei C (1999). Psychosocial and clinical factors predicting resumption of work following acute myocardial infraction in Japanese men. Int J Cardiol 15:39-47.
51. Tein JY, Sandler IN, Zautra AJ (2000). Stressful life events, psychological distress, coping, and parenting of divorced mothers: a longitudinal study. J Fam Psychol 14:27-41.
52. Tzonichaki L, Kleftaras G (2002). Paraplegia from spinal cord injury: self-esteem, loneliness, and life satisfaction. Occupation, Participation and Health, OTJR 22:96-103.
53. Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Lwaesson S (2003). Indications for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med 35:127-131.
54. Weill G (1991). Coping strategies of individuals with spinal cord injury and their families, according to the Lazarus and Folkman's model. [thesis in psychology] [in Hebrew]. Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
55. World Health Organization (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health - ICF. Geneva: WHO.
56. Young JM, McNicoll P (1998). Against all odds: positive life experiences of people with advanced Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Health Soc Work 23:35-43.