Comparing time series cross-section model specifications: The case of welfare state development

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 539-559

  Podestà, Federico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Long run effects; Model specification; Pooled time series cross section analysis; Welfare state development

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747062773     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: 15737845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-005-2076-3     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Banerjee, A., Dolado, I & Mestre, R. (1998). Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. Journal of Time Series Analysis 19: 267-283.
2. Banerjee, A., Dolado J., Galbraith J.W & Hendry D.F. (1993). Cointegration, Error-Correction, and the Econometric. Analysis of Nonstationary Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Beck, N. (1993). The methodology of cointegration. Political Analysis 4: 237-247.
4. Beck, N. (1991). Comparing dynamic specification: the case of presidential approval. Political Analysis 3: 51-88.
5. Beck, N. & Katz, J.N. (2004). Time-series-cross-section issues: dynamics, 2004. Presented at the 21st Annual Summer Meeting of the Society for the Political Methodology, 29-31 July 2004. Stanford, pp. 1-35.
6. Beck, N. & Katz, J.N. (1996) Nuisance vs. substance: specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models. Political Analysis 6: 1-36.
7. Beck, N. & Katz, J.N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Journal Review 89: 634-647.
8. De Boef, S. (2000). Modeling equilibrium relationships: error correction models with strongly autoregressive data. Political Analysis 9: 14-48.
9. Durr, R. (1993). An essay on cointegration and error correction models. Political Analysis 4: 185-228.
10. Engle, R.F. (1984) Wald, likelihood ratio, and Lagrange multiplier tests in econometrics. In: Z. Griliches & M.D. Intriligator (ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 775-826.
11. Engle, R.F. & Granger C.WJ. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55: 251-276.
12. Garrett, G. & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39: 145-177.
13. Granger, C.WJ. & Newbold, P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 2: 111-120.
14. Greene, W. (2003). Econometric Analysis, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
15. Hicks, A. (1994). Introduction to pooling. In T. Janoski & A. Hicks (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169-188.
16. Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Huber, E. & Stephens, J.D. (2001). Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Huber, E., Ragin, C., Stephens, J.D. (1998). Comparative Welfare States data Set, Northwestern University and University of North Carolina.
19. Huber, E., Ragin, C., Stephens, J.D. (1993). Social democracy, christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology 99: 711-749.
20. Iversen, T. & Cusack T. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion. Deindustrialization or globalization?. World Politics 52: 313-349.
21. Janoski, T. & Isaac, L.W. (1994) Introduction to time-series analysis. In: T. Janoski & A. Hicks (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31-53.
22. Judge, G.G., Griffiths WE., Hill, R.C., Lutkepohl, H., Lee, T.C. (1985). The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2nd Edn. New York: Wiley.
23. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious Regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics 90: 1-44.
24. Kmenta, J. (1990). Elements of Econometrics, 2nd Edn. London: Collier Macmillan.
25. Kittel, B. & Winner, H. (2002). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? the globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. MPIfG Discussion Paper 02/3: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies of Cologne.
26. Kittel, B. & Obinger, H. (2002). Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. MPIfG Discussion Paper 02/1: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies of Cologne.
27. OECD, (various year). OECD Statistical Compendium (on cd-rom), Paris: OECD.
28. Parks, R.W (1966). Efficient estimation of a system of regression equation when disturbance are both serially and contemporaneously correlated. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62: 500-509.
29. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the ppp hypothesis. Econometric Theory 3: 579-625.
30. Plumper, T., Troger V. & Manow P. (2003). Pooled data analysis in the comparative political economy of the welfare state: A note on methodology and theory. Presented at the ECPR Conference, 18-21 September 2003, Marburg, pp. 1-45.
31. Westerlund J. (2005). Testing for panel error correction' S-WoPEc Working Paper 11/05: Department of Economics, Lund University.
32. Wilson S.E. & Butler D.M. (2004) A lot more to do: the promise and peril of panel data in political science. Presented at the POLISCI 353 - Workshop in Statistical Modeling: Stanford University, pp. 1-40.
33. Wooldridge, J.M. (2002). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 2nd Edn. South-western College Publishing.