Spatial associations, size-distance relationships and population structure of two dominant life forms in a semiarid enclave of the Venezuelan Andes

Plant Ecology

Volumn 186, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 137-149

  Larrea Alcázar, Daniel M ^a   Soriano, Pascual J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Benefactor plant; Facilitation; Size structure; Size distance relationships

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CACTUS; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); LEGUME; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SEMIARID REGION; SIZE STRUCTURE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

ANDES; SOUTH AMERICA; VENEZUELA;

ACACIA; ACACIA FARNESIANA; ACACIA MACRACANTHA; CACTACEAE; CEREUS REPANDUS; PILOSOCEREUS; PROSOPIS; PROSOPIS JULIFLORA; STENOCEREUS GRISEUS;

EID: 33747045500     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-006-9118-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Armas C., Ordiales R. and Pugnaire F.I. 2004. Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85: 2682-2686.
2. Briones O., Montaña C. and Ezcurra E. 1996. Competition between three Chihuahuan desert species: evidence from plant-distance relations and root distribution. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 453-460.
3. Bertness M.D. and Callaway R.M. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 191-193.
4. Callaway R.M. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. Bot. Rev. 61: 306-349.
5. Callaway R.M. 1997. Positive interactions in plant communities and the individualist-continuum concept. Oecologia 112: 143-149.
6. Callaway R.M. and Walker L.R. 1997. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78: 1958-1965.
7. Campos C.M. and Ojeda R.A. 1997. Dispersal and germination of Prosopis flexuosa (Fabaceae) seeds by desert mammals in Argentina. J. Arid Environ. 35: 707-714.
8. de Viana M.L., Suhring S. and Manly B. 2001. Application of randomization methods to study the association of Trichocereus pasacana (Cactaceae) with potential nurse plants. Plant Ecol. 156: 193-197.
9. Ehleringer J.R. 1984. Intraspecific competitive effects on water relations, growth and reproduction in Encelia farinose. Oecologia 63: 153-158.
10. Flores-Martínez A., Ezcurra E. and Sánchez-Colón S. 1994. Effect of Neobuxbaumia tetetzo on growth and fecundity of its nurse plant Mimosa luisana. J. Ecol. 82: 325-330.
11. Flores J. and Jurado E. 2003. Are nurse-protégé interactions more common among plants from arid environments?. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 911-916.
12. Fowler N. 1986. The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 89-110.
13. Franco A.C. and Nobel P.S. 1989. Effect of nurse plants on the microhabitat and growth of cacti. J. Ecol. 77: 870-886.
14. Godínez-Álvarez H., Valverde T. and Ortega-Baes P. 2003. Demographic trenes in the Cactaceae. Bot. Rev. 69: 173-203.
15. Goldberg D.E., Rajaniemi T., Gurevitch J. and Stewart-Oaten A. 1999. Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80: 1118-1131.
16. Howe H.F. and Miriti M.N. 2004. When seed dispersal matters. BioScience 54: 651-660.
17. Ibañez J. and Soriano P.J. 2005. Hormigas, aves y roedores como depredadores de semillas en un ecosistema semiárido andino de Venezuela. Ecotropicos 17: 38-51.
18. Maestre F.T., Valladares F. and Reynolds J.F. 2005. Is the change of plant-plant interactions with abiotic stress predictable? A meta-analysis of field results in arid environments. J. Ecol. 93: 748-757.
19. Mandujano M., Montaña C. and Eguiarte L.E. 1996. Reproductive ecology and inbreeding depression in Opuntia rastrera (Cactaceae) in the Chihuahuan Desert: why are sexually derived recruitments so rare? Am. J. Bot. 83: 63-70.
20. McAuliffe J.R. 1984. Sahuaro-nurse tree associations in the Sonoran Desert: competitive effects of sahuaros. Oecologia 64: 319-321.
21. McAuliffe J.R. 1988. Markovian dynamics of simple and complex desert plant communities. Am. Nat. 131: 459-490.
22. McAuliffe J.R. 1990. A rapid survey method for the estimation of density and cover in desert plant communities. J. Veg. Sci. 1: 653-656.
23. Mills L.S., Soule M.E. and Doak D.F. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. Bioscience 43: 219-224.
24. Montiel S. and Montaña C. 2000. Vertebrate frugivory and seed dispersal of a Chihuahuan Desert cactus. Plant Ecol. 146: 221-229.
25. Nobel P.S. 1988. Environmental Biology of Agaves and Cacti. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Pielou E.C. 1962. The use of plant-to-neighbour distances for the detection of competition. J. Ecol. 50: 357-367.
27. Rossi B.E. and Villagra P.E. 2003. Effects of Prosopis flexuosa on soil properties and the spatial pattern of understory species in arid Argentina. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 543-550.
28. Sarmiento G. 1975. The dry formations of South America and their floristic conections. J. Biogeogr. 2: 233-251.
29. Schupp E.W. 1995. Seed-seedling conflicts, habitat choice, and patterns of plant recruitment. Am. J. Bot. 82: 399-409.
30. Soriano P.J., Naranjo M.E., Rengifo C., Figuera M., Rondón M. and Ruíz L. 1999. Aves consumidoras de frutos de cactáceas columnares del enclave semiárido de Lagunillas, Mérida, Venezuela. Ecotropicos 12: 91-100.
31. Soriano P.J. and Ruíz A. 2002. The role of bats and birds in the reproduction of columnar cacti in the Northern Andes. In: Fleming T.H. and Valiente-Banuet A. (eds), Evolution, Ecology and Conservation of Columnar Cacti and their Mutualists, Arizona University Press, Tucson, pp. 241-263.
32. Sosa M. and Soriano P.J. 1996. Resource availability, diet and reproduction in Glossophaga longirostris (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in an arid zone of the Venezuelan Andes. J. Tropical Ecol. 12: 805-818.
33. Sosa V. and Fleming T. 2002. Why are columnar cacti associated with nurse plant? In: Fleming T. and Valiente-Banuet A. (eds), Evolution, Ecology and Conservation of Columnar Cacti and their Mutualists, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 306-323.
34. Suzan H., Nabhan G.P. and Pattern D.T. 1996. The importance of Olneya tesota as nurse plant in the Sonoran Desert. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 635-644.
35. Tewksbury J.J., Nabhan G.P., Norman D., Suzán H., Tuxill J. and Donovan J. 1999. In situ conservation of wild chiles and their biotic associates. Conserv. Biol. 13: 98-107.
36. Tewksbury J.J. and Lloyd J.D. 2001. Positive interactions under nurse-plants: spatial scale, stress gradients and benefactor size. Oecologia 127: 425-434.
37. Valiente-Banuet A. and Ezcurra E. 1991. Shade as a cause of the association between the cactus Neobuxbaumia tetetzo and the nurse plant Mimosa luisana in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J. Ecol. 79: 961-971.
38. Valiente-Banuet A., Vite F. and Zavala-Hurtado J.A. 1991. Interaction between the cactus Neobuxmaumia tetetzo and the nurse shrub Mimosa luisana. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 11-14.
39. Villagra P.E., Marone L. and Cony M.A. 2002. Mechanisms affecting the fate of Prosopis flexuosa (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) seeds during early secondary dispersal in the Monte Desert, Argentina. Aust. Ecol. 27: 416-421.
40. Welden C.W., Slauson W.L. and Ward R.T. 1988. Competition and abiotic stress among trees and shrubs in northwest Colorado. Ecology 69: 1566-1577.
41. Wilson S.D. 1991. Variation in competition in eucalypt forests: the importance of standardization in pattern analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 577-586.
42. Yeaton R.I. and Cody M.L. 1976. Competition and spacing and plants communities: The northern Mohave desert. J. Ecol. 64: 689-696.
43. Yeaton R.I. and Romero A. 1986. Organization of vegetation mosaics in the Acacia schaffneri-Opuntia stretacantha association, Southern ChihuahuanDesert, Mexico. J.Ecol. 74: 211-217.