Environmental indicators of ecological integrity and their development for running waters in northern Portugal

Limnetica

Volumn 25, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 479-498

  Oliveira, S V ^a   Cortes, R M V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Basins; Biomonitoring; Ecological integrity; Multimetric techniques; Multivariate analysis; Reference sites; Stochastic dynamic models

Indexed keywords

BIOMONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; HUMAN ACTIVITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RIVER MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; PORTUGAL; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 33747037215     PISSN: 02138409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. ADAMS, S. M. 2002. Biological indicators of aquatic ecosystem stress: introduction and overview. In: Biological Indicators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress. S.M. Adams (ed.): 1-11. American Fisheries Society, Maryland, USA.
2. ALLAN, J. D., D. L. ERICKSON & J. FAY. 1997. The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwat. Biol., 37: 149-161.
3. ANGERMEIER, P. L. & J. R. KARR. 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives. BioScience, 44: 690-697.
4. BARBOUR, M. T., J. GERRITSEN, G. E. GRIFFITH, R. FRYDENBORG, E. McCARRON, J. S. WHITE & M. L. BASTIAN. 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 15: 185-211.
5. BARBOUR, M. T., J. GERRITSEN, B. D. SNYDER & J. B. STRIBLING. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C. (http:www.epa.gov/OWOW/monitoring/techmon.html).
6. BARBOUR, M. T., W. F. SWIETLIK, S. K. JACKSON, D. L. COURTEMANCH, S. P. DAVIES & C. O. YODER. 2000. Measuring the attainment of biological integrity in the USA: a critical element of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia, 422/423: 453-464.
7. BRADFORD, D. F., S. E. FRANSON, A. C. NEALE, D. T. HEGGEM, G. R. MILLER & G. E. CANTERBURY. 1998. Bird species assemblages as indicators of biological integrity in Great Basin rangeland, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 49: 1-22.
8. BUNN, S. E. & P. M. DAVIES. 2000. Biological processes in running waters and their implications' for the assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia, 422/423: 61-70.
9. CABECINHA, E., R. CORTES & J. A. CABRAL. 2004. Performance of a stochastic-dynamic modelling methodology for running water ecological assessments. Ecological Modelling, 175: 303-317.
10. CABRAL, J. A., J. C. MARQUES & S. N. NIELSEN. 2001. Modeling mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) responses to Genapol OXD-080, a non-ionic surfactant, in rice fields. Ecological Engineering, 16, 537-544.
11. CAMPBELL, D. E. 2000. Using energy systems theory to define, measure, and interpret ecological integrity and ecological health. Ecosystem Health, 6: 181-204.
12. CORTES, R. M. V., S. V. OLIVEIRA, D. A. CABRAL, S. SANTOS & T. FERREIRA. 2002. Different scales of analysis in classifying streams: from a multimetric towards an integrate system approach. Large Rivers, Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl., 141/3-4: 209-224.
13. DAVIES, P. E. 2000. Development of a national river bioassessment system (AUSRIVAS) in Australia. In: Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds.): 113-124. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, UK.
14. DAVIES, W. S. & T. P. SIMON. 1995. Biological assessment and criteria. Tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. 415 pp.
15. De PAUW, N. 2000. Using RIVPACS as a modelling tool to predict the impacts of environmental changes. In: Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. J. F. Wright, D. W Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds.): 311-314. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.
16. De PAUW, N. & G. VANHOREN. 1983. Method for biological quality assessment of water courses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia, 100: 153-168.
17. ECONOMOU, A. N., S. SCHMUTZ, A. MELCHER, G. HAIDVOGL, J. BREINE, I. SIMOENS, P. KESTEMONT, D. GOFFAUX, D. PONT, J. BÖHMER, V. KESMINAS, T. VIRBICKAS, M. ZALEWSKI, M. LAPINSKA, J. BACKX, J. J. De LEEUW, T. FERREIRA, U. BEIER, E. DEGERMAN, I. G. COWX, R. A. A. NOBLE, & A. STARKIE. 2002. Development, evaluation & implementation of a standardized fish-based assessment method for the ecological status of European Rivers - a contribution to the Water Framework Directive (FAME). Defining Reference Condition (D3). Final Report. 57 pp.
18. EDWARDS, C. J. & R. A. RYDER. 1990. Biological Surrogates of mesotrophic ecosystem health in the Laurentian Great Lakes, 69 pp.
19. EPA - Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. 40 CFR Part 131. Water Qaulity Standards Regulation. Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 129/Tuesday, July 7/Proposed Rules.
20. FAIRWEATHER, P. G. 1999. State of environment indicators of "river health": exploring the metaphor. Freshwat. Biol., 41: 211-220.
21. FAITH, D. P., P. L. DOSTINE & C. L. HUMPHREY. 1995. Detection of mining impacts on aquatic macroinvertebrate communities: results of a disturbance experiment and the design of a multivariate BACIP monitoring program at Coronation Hill, Northern Territory. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20: 167-180.
22. FORE, L. S. & J. R. KARR. 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 15: 212-231.
23. FRISSEL, C. A., W. J. LISS, C. E. WARREN & M.D. HURLEY. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification. Environmental Management, 10: 199-214.
24. HARRIS, J. H. & R. SILVEIRA. 1999. Large-scale assessments of river health using an Index of Biotic Integrity with low-diversity fish communities. Freshwat. Biol., 41: 235-252.
25. HILDREW, A. G. & P. S. GILLER. 1994. Patchiness, species interactions and disturbance in the stream benthos. In: Aquatic Ecology: scale, patterns and process. P.S. Giller, A.G. Hildrew & D.G. Raffaelli (eds.): 21-61. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge MA.
26. HUGHES, R. M. 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. In: Biological Assessment and Criteria. Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. W.S. Davis & T.P. Simon (eds.): 31-47. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
27. HUGHES, R. M. & D. P. LARSEN.1987. Ecoregions: an approach to surface water protection. Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 60: 486-493.
28. HUGHES, R. M., D. P. LARSEN & J. M. OMERNIK. 1986. Regional reference sites: a method for assessing stream potentials. Environmental management, 10: 629-635.
29. HYLAND, J. L., T. R. SNOOTS & W. L. BALTHIS. 1998. Sediment quality of estuaries in the southeastern U.S. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51: 331-343.
30. JACKSON, L. E., J. C. KURTZ & W. S. FISHER. 2000. Evaluation guidelines for ecological indicators. EPA/620/R-99/005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC. 107 pp.
31. JOHNSON, R. K. 2000. RIVPACS and alternative statistical modeling techniques: accuracy and soundness of principles. In: Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. J. F Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (ed.): 323-332. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.
32. JOHNSON, R. K. 2001. Defining reference conditions and setting class boundaries in ecological monitoring and assessment. Background Document, REFCOND project, 13 pp.
33. KARR, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 6: 21-27.
34. KARR, J. R. 1991. Biological integrity: a long neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecological Applications, 1: 66-84.
35. KARR, J. R. 1992. Ecological integrity. Protecting earth's life support systems. In: Ecosystem Health. R. Constanza, B.G. Norton & B.D. Haskell (eds.): 223-238. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
36. KARR, J. R. 1999. Defining and measuring river health. Freshwat. Biol., 41: 221-234.
37. KARR, J. R & E. W. CHU. 1999. Restoring life in running waters. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 206 pp.
38. KARR, J. R. & E. W. CHU. 2000. Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobiologia, 422/423: 1-14.
39. KARR, J. R. & D. R. DUDLEY. 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Management, 5: 55-68.
40. KARR, J. R., K. D. FAUSCH, P. L. ANGERMEIER, P. R. YANT & I. J. SCHLOSSER. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois. Special Publication no. 5. 28 pp.
41. KLEMM, D. J., K. A. BLOCKSOM, F. A. FULK, A. T. HERLIHY, R. M. HUGHES, P. R. KAUFMANN, D. V. PECK, J. L. STODDARD, W. T. THOENY & M. B. GRIFFITH. 2003. Development and evaluation of a macroinvertebrate biotic integrity index (MBII) for regionally assessing Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams. Environmental Management, 31: 656-669.
42. MADDOCK, I. 1999. The importance of physical habitat assessments for evaluating river health. Freshwat. Biol., 41: 373-391.
43. nd International Symposium on Habitats and Hydraulics, Vol. B, M. Leclerc, H. Capra, S. Valentin, A. Boudreault & I. Cote (eds.): 203-214. Quebec, Canada.
44. MARCHANT, R., HIRST, A., NORRIS, R. H., BUTCHER, R., METZELING, L. & D. TILLER. 1997. Classification and prediction of macroinvertebrates assemblages from running waters in Victoria, Australia. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 16: 664-681.
45. MINSHALL, G. W. 1988. Stream ecosystem theory: a global perspective. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 1: 263-288.
46. MOMMSEN, T. P., M. M. VIJAYAN & T. W. MOON. 1999. Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9: 211-268.
47. MYERS, M. S. & J. W. FOURNIE. 2002. Histopathological biomarkers as integrators of anthropogenic Stressors. In: Biological Indicators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress. S. M. Adams (ed.): 221-287. American Fisheries Society, Maryland, USA.
48. NORRIS, R. H. & M. C. THOMS. 1999. What is river health? Freshwat. Biol., 41: 197-209.
49. NOSS, R. F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology, 4: 31-48.
50. NRA. 1996. River habitats in England and Wales: a national overview. River Habitat Survey Report no. 1. National Rivers Authority, Bristol. 53 pp.
51. OEPA. 1987. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life, Volume II: Users Manual for biological field assessment of Ohio surface waters. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), Ecological Assessment Section, Division of Water Quality, Columbus, Ohio. 251 pp.
52. OEPA. 1989. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life, Volume III. Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory methods for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), Columbus, Ohio. 57 pp.
53. OEPA. 1990. Water quality program highlights. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, Office of Water, Washington, DC 20460. 4 pp.
54. OLIVEIRA, S. V. & R. M. V. CORTES. 2005. A biologically relevant habitat condition index for streams in northern Portugal. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 15: 189-210.
55. OLIVEIRA, S. V. & R. M. V. CORTES. 2006a. Combining logistic models with multivariate methods for the rapid biological assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 112: 93-113.
56. OLIVEIRA, S. V. & R. M. V. CORTES. 2006b. Searching biological metrics of macroinvertebrates for biocriteria and assessment. Submitted to Fisheries Management and Ecology.
57. OMERNIK, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geography, 77: 118-125.
58. OMERNIK, J. M. 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In: Biological Assessment Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision-Making. W. S. Davis & T. Simon (eds.): 49-62. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
59. OSBORNE, L. L & M. J. WILEY. 1988. Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Management, 26: 9-27.
60. PARSONS, M. & R. H. NORRIS. 1996. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwat. Biol., 36: 419-434.
61. PETTS, G. E. 1989. Historical analysis of fluvial hydro-systems. In: Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe. G. E. Petts, H. Moller & A. L. Roux (eds.): 1-18. Wiley, Chichester.
62. PLAFKIN, J. L, M. T. BARBOUR, K. D. PORTER, S. K. GROSS & R. M. HUGHES. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA/444/4-89-001 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. 196 pp.
63. POFF, N. L. & J. V. WARD. 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 46: 1805-1818.
64. RAKOCINSKI, C. F., S. S. BROWN, G. R. GASTON, R. W. HEARD, W. W. WALKER & J. K. SUMMERS. 1997. Macrobenthic responses to natural a contaminant-related gradients in northern Gulph of Mexico estuaries. Ecological Applications, 7: 1278-1298.
65. RAPPORT, D. J., R. CONSTANZA & A. J. McMICHAEL. 1998. Assessing ecosystem health. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13: 397-402.
66. REFCOND GUIDANCE. 2003. Guidance on establishing reference conditions and ecological status class boundaries for inland surface waters. Produced by Working Group 2.3 - Reference conditions for inland surface waters. 86 pp.
67. REYNOLDSON, T. B., R. C. BAILEY, K. E. DAY & R. H. NORRIS. 1995. Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on Benthic Assesssment of SedimenT (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological state. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20: 198-219.
68. REYNOLDSON, T. B., R. H. NORRIS, V. H. RESH, K. E. DAY & D. M. ROSENBERG. 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 16: 833-852.
69. RICHARDS, C., JOHNSON, L. B. & G. E. HOST. 1996. Land-scape-scale influences on stream habitats and biota. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53(Suppl. 1): 295-311.
70. ROSENBERG, D. M. & V. H. RESH. 1993. Fresh-water biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York. 488 pp.
71. ROSENBERG, D. M., T. B. REYNOLDSON & V. H. RESH. 2000. Establishing reference conditions in the Fraser River catchment, British Columbia, Canada, using the BEAST (Benthic Assessment of Sediment) predictive model. In: Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds.): 181-194. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.
72. ROSGEN, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena, 22: 169-199.
73. ROSGEN, D. L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO. 390 pp.
74. ROTH, N. E., J. D. ALLAN & D. L. ERICKSON. 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology, 11(3): 141-156.
75. SANTOS, M. & J. A. CABRAL. 2003. Development of a stochastic dynamic model for ecological indicators prediction in changed Mediterranean agroecosystems of north-eastern Portugal. Ecological Indicators, 3: 285-303.
76. SEDELL, J. R., G. H. REEVES, F. R. HAUER, J. A. STANFORD & C. P. HAWKINS. 1990. Role of refugia in recovery from disturbances: modern fragmented and disconnected river systems. Environmental Management, 14: 711-724.
77. SCHMUTZ, S., M. KAUFMAN, B. VOGEL, M. JUNGWIRTH & S. MUHAR. 2000. A multi-level concept for fish-based, river-type-specific assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia, 422/423: 279-289.
78. SCHUMM, S. A. 1977. The fluvial system. Wiley-Inter-science Publication, Sydney. 338 pp.
79. SCHOFIELD, N. J. & P. E. DAVIES. 1996. Measuring the health of our rivers. Water (Australia), 23: 39-43.
80. SIMPSON, J. C. & R. H. NORRIS. 2000. Biological assessment of river quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In: Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds.): 125-142. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.
81. SMITH, J. A. 1994. Sediment toxicity testing: battery test evaluation of shallow urban streams and the effect of sampling method on toxicity. MASc. Dept. of Civil Engr., The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. 121 pp.
82. SUTER, I. G. W. 1993. A critique of ecosystem health concepts and indexes. Journal of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12: 1533-1539.
83. SUTHERLAND, T. F., C. D. LEVINGS, J. M. HELFIELD, B. T. HARGRAVE, W. KNAPP & D. STUCCHI. 2002. Research tools in support of habitat management priorities. In: Environmental Studies for Sustainable Aquaculture (ESSA). B. T. Hargrave (ed.): 5-8.
84. Workshop report. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2411: v + 117 p.
85. THOMS, M. C., R. W. OGDEN & M. A. REID. 1999. Establishing the condition of lowland flood-plain rivers: a palaeo-ecological approach. Freshwat. Biol., 41: 407-423.
86. TOWNSEND, C. R. 1996. Concepts in river ecology: pattern and process in the catchment hierarchy. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie (Suppl. 113), Large Rivers, 10:3-21.
87. TOWNSEND, C. R. & A. G. HILDREW. 1994. Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwat. Biol., 31: 265-276.
88. TOWNSEND, C. R. & R. H. RILEY. 1999. Assessment of river health: accounting for perturbation pathways in physical and ecological space. Freshwat. Biol., 41: 393-405.
89. VOINOV, A., R. CONSTANZA, L. A. WAINGER, R. BAUMANS, F. VILLA, T. MAXWELL & H. VOINOV 2001. Patuxent, landscape model: integrated ecological economic modeling of a watershed. Environmental Modelling & Software, 14: 473-491.
90. WALKER, J. & D. J. REUTER, (eds.). Indicators of catchment health. A technical perspective. CSIRO, Australia. 174 pp.
91. WARD, J. V., K. TOCKNER, U. UEHLINGER & F. MALARD. 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 17: 311-323.
92. WIENS, J. A. 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology, 47: 501-515.
93. WIRGIN, I. I. & C. W. THEODORAKIS. 2002. Molecular biomarkers in aquatic organisms: DNA damage and RNA expression. In: Biological Indicators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress. Ed: S.M. Adams (ed.): 43-110. American Fisheries Society, Maryland, USA.
94. WRIGHT, J. F. 1995. Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20, 181-197.
95. WRIGHT, J. F. 2000. An introduction to RIVPACS. In: Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. J. F. Wright, D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds.): 1-23. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria, U.K.
96. WRIGHT, J. F., FURSE, M. T. & P. D. ARMITAGE. 1994. Use of macroinvertebrate communities to detect environmental stress in running waters. In: Water quality and stress indicators in marine and freshwater systems: linking levels of organization. D. W. Sutcliffe (ed.): 15-34. The Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside.
97. WRIGHT, J. F., B. MOSS, P. D. ARMITAGE & M. T. FURSE. 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macroinvertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol., 14: 221-256.
98. YODER, C. O. 1995. Policy issues and management applications for biological criteria. In: Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. W.S. Davis & T.P. Simon (eds.): 327-343. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
99. YODER, C. O. & E. T. RAKIN. 1998. The role of biological indicators in a state water quality management process. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51: 61-88.