Independent operation by subsystems: Strategic behavior for the Brazilian electricity sector

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 2964-2976

  Guido Tapia Carpio, Lucio ^a   Olimpio Pereira Jr , Amaro ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dynamic dual programming; Energy system management; Game theory

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; DECISION MAKING; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; GAME THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; SUBROUTINES;

DYNAMIC DUAL PROGRAMMING; ENERGY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT; SUBSYSTEMS;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; GAME THEORY; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION;

BRAZIL; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 33747000017     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Araújo, J.L.R.H., 1999. Questões da transmissão em um setor elétrico reestruturado. In: Borenstein, C.R. et al. (Eds.), Regulação e Gestão Competitiva no Setor Elétrico Brasileiro. Editora Sagra Luzzato, Porto Alegre, pp. 197-213.
2. Bai X., Shajidehpour S.M., Ramesh V.C., and Yu E. Transmission analysis by Nash game method. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 12 3 (1997) 1046-1052
3. Berry C.A., Hobbs B.F., Meroney W.A., O'Neill R.P., and Stewart Jr. W.R. Understanding how market power can arise in network competition: a game theoretic approach. Utilities Policy 8 3 (1999) 139-158
4. Borenstein S., and Bushnell J. An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California's electricity industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 47 (1999) 285-324
5. Borenstein S., Bushnell J., and Stoft S. The competitive effects of transmission capacity in a deregulated electricity industry. RAND Journal of Economics 31 2 (2000) 294-325
6. Bushnell J. A mixed complementarity model of hydrothermal electricity competition in the western United States. Operations Research 51 1 (2003) 80-172
7. Gibbons R. An introduction to applicable game theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 1 (1997) 127-149
8. IBM Corporation, 1995. Optimization subroutine library (OSL). Guide and Reference. Release 2.1, fifth Ed.
9. Kelman R., Barroso L.A.N., and Pereira M.V.F. Market power assessment and mitigation in hydrothermal systems. IEEE Transaction on Power System 16 (2001) 354-359
10. Kemperer P., and Meyer M. Supply function equilibria in oligopoly under uncertainty. Econometrica 57 (1989) 1243-1277
11. Kreps D.M., and Scheinkman J.A. Quantity precommitment and bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. The Bell Journal of Economics 14 (1983) 326-337
12. Operador Nacional do Sistema (ONS), 2004. Planejamento Anual da Operação Energética. http://www.ons.org.br/ons/planejamento/planejamento_energetico00.htm.
13. Oren S.S. Economic inefficiency of passive transmission rights in congested electricity systems with competition generation. The Energy Journal 18 1 (1997) 63-83
14. Pereira M.V.F. Optimal stochastic operations scheduling of large hydroelectric systems. Electric Power & Energy Systems 11 (1989) 161-169
15. Pignon, V., 2001. Electricity transmission tariffs in the Nordic countries: an assessment of pricing rules. Conference DRUID Winter 2001, Winter Conference, Denmark, 20. Working paper in: http://www.grjm.net/documents/Virginie-Pignon/wp_vp2001a.pdf. (Paris).
16. Ramos-Real F.J. Cost functions and the electric utility industry. A contribution to the debate on deregulation. Energy Policy 33 1 (2005) 69-87
17. Scott T.J., and Read E.G. Modelling hydro reservoir operation in a deregulated electricity market. International Transaction in Operational Research 3 3/4 (1996) 243-253
18. Stoft S. Congestion pricing with fewer prices than zones. Electricity Journal 11 4 (1998) 23-31. Working paper www.stoft.com/e/lib/papers/Stoft-1998-Fewer-Prices-than-Zones.pdf
19. Ventosa M., Baíllo A., Ramos A., and Rivier M. Electricity market modeling trends. Energy Policy 33 7 (2005) 897-913
20. Von Der Fehr N.H.M., and Harbord D. Spot market competition in the UK electricity industry. The Economic Journal 103 (1993) 531-546
21. Wolak, F.A., 1997. Market design and price behavior in restructured electricity markets: An International Comparison. Working paper: PWP-051, University of California Energy Institute. August, 1997. http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/PDF/pwp051.pdf.