Sequencing DNA by dynamic force spectroscopy: Limitations and prospects

Nano Letters

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1483-1486

  Voulgarakis, N K ^a   Redondo, A ^a   Bishop, A R ^a   Rasmussen, K O ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE-STRANDED DNA; DYNAMIC FORCE SPECTROSCOPY; SINGLE MOLECULE SEQUENCING TOOLS;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DNA SEQUENCES;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL MODEL; DNA SEQUENCE; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY;

MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 33746989331     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl0608801     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Shendure, J.; Mitra, R. D.; Varma, C.; Church, G. M. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 335.
2. Reif, J. H. Science 2002, 296, 478.
3. Adleman, L. M. Science 1994, 266, 1021.
4. Conroy, R. S.; Danilowicz, C. Contemp. Phys. 2004, 45 (4), 277.
5. Rief, M.; Clausen-Schaumann, H.; Gaub, H. E. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 346.
6. Krautbauer, R.; Rief, M.; Gaub, H. E. Nano Lett. 2003, 3 (4), 493.
7. Peyrard, M.; Bishop, A. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 2755.
8. Dauxois, T.; Peyrard, M.; Bishop, A. R. Phys. Rev. E1993, 47, R44.
9. Campa, A.; Giansanti, A. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58, 3538.
10. Voulgarakis, N. K.; Kaiosakas, K.; Rasmussen, K. Ø.; Bishop, A. R. Nano Lett. 2004, 4 (4), 629.
11. Ares, S.; Voulgarakis, N. K.; Rasmussen, K. Ø.; Bishop, A. R. Phys Rev. Lett. 2005, 94, 035504.
12. Voulgarakis, N. K.; Redondo, A.; Bishop, A. R.; Rasmussen, K. Ø. cond-mat/0512487 2006.
13. Essevaz-Roulet, B.; Bockelmann, U.; Heslot, F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 1997, 94, 11935.
14. Danilowicz, C.; Kafri, Y.; Conroy, R. S.; Coljee, V. W.; Weeks, J.; Prentiss, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 078101.
15. Evans, E.; Ritchie, K. Biophys J 1999, 76, 2439.
16. Lindsay, S. M. Private communication.
17. Voulgarakis, N. K.; Redondo, A.; Bishop, A. R.; Rasmussen, K. Ø. In preparation.
18. In this limit, the elastic energy of the probe dominates the total energy and, as a result, there is only a single minimum.
19. 15