L-lactate dehydrogenase and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activities in bovine milk as indicators of non-specific mastitis

Journal of Dairy Research

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 431-440

  Chagunda, Mizeck G G ^a   Larsen, Torben ^a   Bjerring, Martin ^a   Ingvartsen, Klaus L ^a  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

Author keywords

L lactate dehydrogenase; Mastitis; N acetyl D glucosaminidase; Somatic cell count

Indexed keywords

ACETYLGLUCOSAMINIDASE; LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CELL COUNT; CYTOLOGY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENZYMOLOGY; FEMALE; METABOLISM; MILK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACETYLGLUCOSAMINIDASE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CELL COUNT; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; L-LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MILK; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BOS TAURUS;

EID: 33746863525     PISSN: 00220299     EISSN: 14697629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022029906001956     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Batavani RA, Mortaz E, Falahian K & Dawoodi MA 2003 Study of frequency, etiology and some enzymatic activities of subclinical ovine mastitis in Urmia, Iran. Small Ruminant Research 50 45-50
2. Berning LM & Shook GE 1992 Prediction of mastitis using somatic cell count, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity, and lactose. Journal of Dairy Science 75 1840-1848
3. Bogin E, Ziv G & Avidar J 1976 Enzyme activities in normal and inflamed bovine udder tissues. Zentralblatt fuer Veterinaermedizin A 23 460-466
4. Bogin E, Ziv G, Avidor J, Rivetz B, Gordin S & Saran A 1977 Distribution of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in normal and inflamed bovine udder and milk. Research in Veterinary Science 22 198-200
5. Chagunda MGG, Friggens NC, Rasmussen MD & Larsen T 2006 A model for detection of individual cow mastitis based on an indicator measured in milk. Journal of Dairy Science (in press)
6. De Haas Y, Barkem HW & Veerkamp RF 2002 Genetic parameters of pathogen specific incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Animal Science 74 233-242
7. Delwiche M, Tang X, BonDurant R & Munro C 2001 Improved biosensor for measurement of progesterone in bovine milk. Transactions of the ASAE 44 1997-2002
8. De Mol RM & Ouweltjes W 2001 Detection model for mastitis in cows milked in an automatic milking system. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 49 71-82
9. Fox LK, Hancock DD, McDonald JS & Gasins CT 1988 N-acetyl-beta-D- glucosaminidase activity in whole milk and milk fractions. Journal of Dairy Science 71 2915-2922
10. Godden S, Bey R, Reneau J, Farnsworth R & LaValle M 2002 Field validation of a milk-line sampling device for monitoring milk component data. Journal of Dairy Science 85 2192-2196
11. Hamann J 2001 Relationships between somatic cell count and milk composition. In Proceedings of the International Dairy Federation (IDF) World Dairy Summit 2001, Auckland, NZ, IDF Bulletin 372 56-59
12. Hamann J 2005 Diagnosis of mastitis and indicators of milk quality. In Proceedings of the 4th International Dairy Federation (IDF) Mastitis Conference. Mastitis in Dairy Production. Current Knowledge and Future Solutions, pp. 82-90 (Ed. H Hogeveen). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers
13. Harmon RJ 1994 Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 77 2103-2112
14. Hillerton JE 1999 Redefining mastitis based on somatic cell count. Bulletin 345. International Dairy Federation Brussels, Belgium, pp. 4-6
15. Hillerton JE 2000 Detecting mastitis cow-side. In Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the National Mastitis Council, Inc., February 13-16, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 48-53
16. Honkanen-Buzalski T, Kangasniemi R, Atroshi F & Sandholm M 1981 Effect of lactation stage and number on milk albumin (BSA) and somatic cell count. Zentralblatt fuer Veterinaermedizin 28 760-767
17. IDF 1997 Recommendations for presentation of mastitis-related data. Bulletin 321. Brussels Belgium: International Dairy Federation
18. Jensen NE & Knudsen K 1991 Interquarter composition of markers of subclinical mastitis: somatic cell count, electrical conductivity, N-acetyl-β-D-glycosamidase, and antitrypin. Journal of Dairy Research 58 389-399
19. Kato K, Mori K & Katoh N 1989 Contribution of leucocytes to the origin of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes in milk of bovine mastitis. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science 51 530-539
20. Kitchen BJ, Middleton G & Salmon M 1978 Bovine milk N-acetyl-β-D-glycosamidase and its significance in the detection of abnormal udder secretions. Journal of Dairy Research 45 15-20
21. Kitchen BJ, Seng Kwee W, Middleton G & Andrews RJ 1984 Relationship between the level of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) in bovine milk and the presence of mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Research 51 11-16
22. Korsgaard IR & Løavendahl P 2002 An introduction to multiprocess class II mixture models. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France. Communication No. 16-13
23. Labohm R, Gotz E, Luhofen G, Hess RG & Bostedt H 1998 Factors influencing SCC in dairy cows. 1. Influence of bacteriological findings, stage and number of lactation. Milchwissenschaft 52 63-66
24. Larsen T 2005 Determination of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in milk by a fluorometric assay. Journal of Dairy Research 72 209-216
25. Laevens H, Deluyker H, Schukken YH, De Meulemeester L, Vandermeersch R, De Muelenaere E & De Kruif A 1997 Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80 3219-3226
26. Ma Y, Ryan C, Barbano DM, Galton DM, Rudan MA & Boor KJ 2000 Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. Journal of Dairy Science 83 264-274
27. Maisi P, Junttila J & Seppanen J 1987 Detection of sub-clinical mastitis in ewes. British Veterinary Journal 143 402-408
28. Mattila T, O'Boyle D & Frost AJ 1988 Distribution of lysosomal enzymes within the non-secretary epithelium of the bovine mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Research 55 339-344
29. Nielen M, Schukken YH, Brand A, Haring S & Ferwerda-van Zonneveld RT 1995 Comparison of analysis techniques for on-line detection of clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 78 1050-1061
30. Olson CC & Amick DD 1985 Weighing and sampling milk for DHI tests. Fact sheet F-7. In National Cooperative Dairy Herd Improvement Program Handbook (Ed. JL Majeski). Washington DC, USA: Extension Services USDA
31. Pemberton RM, Hart JP & Mottram TT 2001 An electrochemical immunosensor for milk progesterone using a continuous flow system. Biosensors & Bioelectronics 16 715-723
32. Pyörälä S & Pyörälä E 1997 Accuracy of methods using somatic cell count and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity in milk to assess the bacteriological cure of bovine clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80 2820-2825
33. Rasmussen MD 1999 Automatic Milking Systems (AMS). Bulletin 345. International Dairy Federation Brussels, Belgium
34. Rasmussen MD, Bjerring M & Skjøth F 2005 Visual appearance and CMT score of foremilk of individual quarters in relation to cell count of cows milked automatically. Journal of Dairy Research 72 49-56
35. Redetzky R, Hamann J, Grabowski NTh & Klein G 2005 Diagnostic value of the California mastitis test in comparison to electronically-counted somatic cells in bovine milk. Mastitis in dairy production. Proceedings of the 4th IDF International Mastitis Conference (Ed. H Hogeveen), pp. 487-494
36. SAS Inst. Inc. 2001 SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC, USA
37. Schüttel M 1999 [Activities of N-acetyl-β-D-glycosamidase in milk, blood and urine of lactating cattle]. Dissertation, Dr. Med. Vet. Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
38. Smith A-FM & West M 1983 Monitoring renal transplants: An application of the multiprocess Kalman filter. Biometrics 39 867-878
39. Sommer H, Hambitzer R & Aydin I 1986 LDH-activity and correlation to pathogenic and non pathogenic micro-organisms in dairy-milk. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 42 373-375
40. Timms LL & Schultz LH 1985 N-acetyl-β-D-glycosamidase in milk and blood plasma during dry and early postpartum periods. Journal of Dairy Science 68 3367-3370
41. Weller JI, Saran A & Zelinger Y 1992 Genetic and environmental relationships among somatic cell count, bacterial infection, and clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 75 2532-2540
42. Wiggans GR & Shook GE 1987 A lactation measure of somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science 70 2666-2672
43. Zank W & Schlatterer B 1998 Assesment of subacute mammary inflammation by soluble biomarkers in comparison to somatic cell counts in quarter milk samples from dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A 45 41-51