Should there be both categorical and dimensional criteria for the substance use disorders in DSM-V?

Addiction

Volumn 101, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages 17-22

  Helzer, John E ^a,c   Van Den Brink, Wim ^b   Guth, Sarah E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Health Behavior Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorical diagnoses; Dimensional diagnoses; DSM; Substance use disorders

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOLISM; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; REVIEW; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ALCOHOLISM; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 33746911898     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01587.x     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Kraemer H. C., Noda A., O'Hara R. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatr Res 2004; 38: 17-25.
2. Van Os J., Gilvarry C., Bale R., Van Horn E., Tattan T., White I. et al. A comparison of the utility of dimensional and categorical representations of psychosis. UK700 Group. Psychol Med 1999; 29: 595-606.
3. Maser J. D., Patterson T. Spectrum and nosology: implications for DSM-V [Review, 114 references]. Psychiatr Clinics North Am 2002; 25: 855-85.
4. Helzer J. E., Pryzbeck T. R. The co-occurrence of alcoholism with other psychiatric disorders in the general population and its impact on treatment. J Stud Alcohol 1988; 49: 219-24.
5. Krueger R. F., Markon K. E. Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathy. Am Rev Clin Psychol 2006; 2: 111-33.
6. Krueger R. F., Nichol P. E., Hicks B. M., Markon K. E., Patrick C. J., Iacono W. G. et al. Using latent trait modeling to conceptualize an alcohol problems continuum. Psychol Assess 2004; 16: 107-19.
7. Horn J. L., Wanberg K. W. Symptom patterns related to excessive use of alcohol. Q J Stud Alcohol 1969; 30: 35-58.
8. Tarter R. E., Moss H. B., Arria A., Mezzich A. C., Vanyukov M. M. The psychiatric diagnosis of alcoholism: critique and proposed reformulation. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1992; 16: 106-16.
9. Mayfield D., McLeod G., Hall P. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry 1974; 131: 1121-3.
10. Saunders J. B., Aasland O. G., Babor T. F., de la Fuente J. R., Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption - II. Addiction 1993; 88: 791-804.
11. Skinner H. A., Allen B. A. Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation. J Abnorm Psychol 1982; 91: 199-209.
12. McLellan A. T., Luborsky L., Woody G. E., O'Brien C. P. An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients. The Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980 January; 168: 26-33.
13. Cottler L. B., Robins L. N., Helzer J. E. The reliability of the CIDI-SAM: a comprehensive substance abuse interview. Br J Addict 1989; 84: 801-14.
14. Robins L. N., Helzer J. E., Croughan J., Ratcliffe K. S. National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981; 38: 381-9.
15. Robins L. N., Wing J., Wittchen H. U., Helzer J. E., Babor T. F., Burke J. et al. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 45: 1069-77.
16. Achenbach T. A., Howell C. T., Quay H. C., Conners C. K. National survey of problems and competencies among four-to sixteen-year-olds: parents' reports for normative and clinical samples. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 1991; 56: 51-6.
17. Muthén B. Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction 2006; 101: S6-16.
18. Helzer J. E., Kraemer H. C., Krueger R. F. The feasibility and need for dimensional psychiatric diagnoses. Psychol Med in press.
19. Cohen J. 1983 The cost of dichotomization. Appl Psychol Measure 2005; 7: 249-53.
20. Kraemer H. C. Evaluating Medical Tests: objective and quantitative guidelines. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1992.
21. McFall R. M., Treat T. A. Quantifying the information value of clinical assessments with signal detection theory. Ann Rev Psychol 1999; 50: 215-41.
22. Kendell R. E. The Role of Diagnosis in Psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1975.
23. Helzer J. E. Development of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. In: Helzer J. E., Canino G. J., editors. Alcoholism - North America. Europe, and Asia. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992, p. 13-20.
24. Regier D. A., Kaelber C. T., Rae D. S., Farmer M. E., Knauper B., Kessler R. C. et al. Limitations of diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments for mental disorders. Implications for research and policy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55: 109-15.
25. Van Praag H. M. Two-tier diagnosing in psychiatry [Review, 50 references]. Psychiatry Res 1990; 34: 1-11.