Ureteral Complications in the Renal Transplant Recipient after Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy

European Urology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 535-541

  Fuller, T Florian ^a   Deger, Serdar ^a   Büchler, Annette ^a   Roigas, Jan ^a   Schönberger, Bernd ^a   Schnorr, Dietmar ^a   Tüllmann, Max ^a   Loening, Stefan A ^a   Giessing, Markus ^a  

^a Department of Urology ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Kidney transplantation; Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy; Politano Leadbetter; Ureteral complications

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC LIVING DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPHOCELE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORBIDITY; NEPHRECTOMY; POLITANO LEADBETTER OPERATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RECIPIENT; RENAL ARTERY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER DISEASE; URETER OBSTRUCTION; URETER REIMPLANTATION; URETERONEOCYSTOSTOMY; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL DISEASES;

EID: 33746906328     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.03.025     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Derweesh I.H., Goldfarb D.A., Abreu S.C., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65 (2005) 862-866
2. El-Galley R., Hood N., Young C.J., Deierhoi M., and Urban D.A. Donor nephrectomy: a comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 171 (2004) 40-43
3. Simforoosh N., Basiri A., Tabibi A., Shakhssalim N., and Hosseini Moghaddam S.M. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 95 (2005) 851-855
4. Hakim N.S., Benedetti E., Pirenne J., et al. Complications of ureterovesical anastomosis in kidney transplant patients: the Minnesota experience. Clin Transplant 8 (1994) 504-507
5. Shoskes D.A., Hanbury D., Cranston D., and Morris P.J. Urological complications in 1,000 consecutive renal transplant recipients. J Urol 153 (1995) 18-21
6. Whang M., Geffner S., Baimeedi S., Bonomini L., and Mulgaonkar S. Urologic complications in over 1000 kidney transplants performed at the Saint Barnabas healthcare system. Transplant Proc 35 (2003) 1375-1377
7. Makisalo H., Eklund B., Salmela K., et al. Urological complications after 2084 consecutive kidney transplantations. Transplant Proc 29 (1997) 152-153
8. El-Mekresh M., Osman Y., Ali-El-Dein B., El-Diasty T., and Ghoneim M.A. Urological complications after living-donor renal transplantation. BJU Int 87 (2001) 295-306
9. Streeter E.H., Little D.M., Cranston D.W., and Morris P.J. The urological complications of renal transplantation: a series of 1535 patients. BJU Int 90 (2002) 627-634
10. Giessing M., Deger S., Schonberger B., Turk I., and Loening S.A. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: from alternative to standard procedure. Transplant Proc 35 (2003) 2093-2095
11. Turk I.A., Deger S., Davis J.W., et al. Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: a new technique with preservation of vascular length. J Urol 167 (2002) 630-633
12. Politano V.A., and Leadbetter W.F. An operative technique for the correction of vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 79 (1958) 932-941
13. Bachmann A., Wolff T., Ruszat R., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the standard open approach. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 90-96
14. Giessing M., Reuter S., Deger S., et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy in Germany: impact on donor health-related quality of life and willingness to donate. Transplant Proc 37 (2005) 2011-2015
15. Hariharan S., McBride M.A., Cherikh W.S., Tolleris C.B., Bresnahan B.A., and Johnson C.P. Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival. Kidney Int 62 (2002) 311-318
16. Troppmann C., McBride M.A., Baker T.J., and Perez R.V. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a risk factor for delayed function and rejection in pediatric kidney recipients? A UNOS analysis. Am J Transplant 5 (2005) 175-182
17. Abrahams H.M., Meng M.V., Freise C.E., and Stoller M.L. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for pediatric recipients: outcomes analysis. Urology 63 (2004) 163-166
18. Singer J.S., Ettenger R.B., Gore J.L., et al. Laparoscopic versus open renal procurement for pediatric recipients of living donor renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 5 (2005) 2514-2520
19. Su L.M., Ratner L.E., Montgomery R.A., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surgery 240 (2004) 358-363
20. Ratner L.E., Montgomery R.A., Maley W.R., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the recipient. Transplantation 69 (2000) 2319-2323
21. Philosophe B., Kuo P.C., Schweitzer E.J., et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 68 (1999) 497-502
22. Lind M.Y., Hazebroek E.J., Kirkels W.J., Hop W.C., Weimar W., and Ijzermans J.N. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: ureteral complications in recipients. Urology 63 (2004) 36-40
23. Sharma A.K., Meier S., Larmeu L., Florman S., and Slakey D.P. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a low rate of complications. Prog Transplant 15 (2005) 271-275
24. Butterworth P.C., Horsburgh T., Veitch P.S., Bell P.R., and Nicholson M.L. Urological complications in renal transplantation: impact of a change of technique. Br J Urol 79 (1997) 499-502
25. Thrasher J.B., Temple D.R., and Spees E.K. Extravesical versus Leadbetter-Politano ureteroneocystostomy: a comparison of urological complications in 320 renal transplants. J Urol 144 (1990) 1105-1109
26. Tanabe K., Miyamoto N., Ishida H., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN): establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a single center. Am J Transplant 5 (2005) 739-745
27. Posselt A.M., Mahanty H., Kang S.M., et al. Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78 (2004) 1665-1669
28. Carter J.T., Freise C.E., McTaggart R.A., et al. Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient. Am J Transplant 5 (2005) 1312-1318
29. Laguna M.P., Schreuders L.C., Rassweiler J.J., et al. Development of laparoscopic surgery and training facilities in Europe: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 47 (2005) 346-351
30. Lind M.Y., Zur Borg I.M., Hazebroek E.J., et al. The effect of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy on the long-term renal function in donor and recipient: a retrospective study. Transplantation 80 (2005) 700-703
31. Bachmann A., Wolff T., Ruszat R., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the standard open approach. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 90-96
32. Boulware L.E., Ratner L.E., Sosa J.A., et al. Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: identifying opportunities for intervention. Transplantation 27 (2002) 1683-1691