Diversity Space and its application to library selection and design

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1588-1597

  Fitzgerald, Sara H ^a   Sabat, Michal ^a   Geysen, H Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIBRARIES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SCREENING; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

DIVERSITY SPACE; LIBRARY-LEVEL INFORMATION; PHARMACOPHORIC ENTITIES; SURROGATE;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 33746885489     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci060066z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Geysen, H. M.; Schoenen, F.; Wagner, D.; Wagner, R. Combinatorial Compound Libraries For Drug Discovery: An Ongoing Challenge. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 222-230.
2. Downs, G. M.; Willett, P. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd, D. B., Eds.; VCH: New York, 1996; Vol. 7, pp 1-66.
3. Bures, M. G.; Martin, Y. C. Computational methods in molecular diversity and combinatorial chemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1998, 2, 376-380.
4. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
5. Mason, J. S.; Hermsmeier, M. A. Diversity assessment. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 342-349.
6. Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 903-911.
7. Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Bradshaw, J. Similarity Searching Using Reduced Graphs. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 338-345.
8. UNITY; Tripos, Inc.: St. Louis, MO, 1995.
9. MACCS-II; MDL Ltd.: San Leandro, CA, 1992.
10. MOE, Molecular Operating Environment; Chemical Computing Group, Inc.: Montreal, Canada, 1997.
11. Flower, D. R. On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 379-386.
12. Nilakantan, R.; Bauman, N.; Venkataraghavan, R. New Method for Rapid Characterization of Molecular Shapes: Applications in Drug Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 79-85.
13. Masek, B. B.; Merchant, A.; Matthew, J. B. Molecular Shape Comparison of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 1230-1238.
14. Walker, P. D.; Maggiora, G. M.; Johnson, M. A.; Petke, J. D.; Mezey, P. G. Shape Group Analysis of Molecular Similarity: Shape Similarity of Six-Membered Aromatic Ring Systems. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 568-578.
15. Van Drie, J. H. Strategies for the determination of pharmacophoric 3D database queries. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 39-52.
16. Matter, H.; Pötter, T. Comparing 3D Pharmacophore Triplets and 2D Fingerprints for Selecting Diverse Compound Subsets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1211-1225.
17. Kurogi, Y.; Güner, O. F. Pharmacophore Modeling and Three-dimensional Database Searching for Drug Design Using Catalyst. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 1035-1055.
18. Makara, G. Measuring Molecular Similarity and Diversity: Total Pharmacophore Diversity. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3563-3571.
19. Abrahamian, E.; Fox, P. C.; Nærum, L.; Christensen, I. T.; Thøgersen, H.; Clark, R. D. Efficient Generation, Storage, and Manipulation of Fully Flexible Pharmacophore Multiplets and Their Use in 3-D Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 458-468.
20. Langer, T.; Krovat, E. M. Chemical feature-based pharmacophores and virtual library screening for discovery of new leads. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2003, 6, 370-376.
21. Nicklaus, M. C.; Wang, S.; Driscoll, J. S.; Milne, G. W. A. Conformational Changes of Small Molecules Binding to Proteins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1995, 3, 411-428.
22. Perola, E.; Charifson, P. S. Conformational Analysis of Drug-Like Molecules Bound to Proteins: An Extensive Study of Ligand Reorganization upon Binding. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2499-2510.
23. Pickett, S. D.; Luttman, C.; Guerin, V.; Laoui, A.; James, E. DIVSEL and COMPLIB - Strategies for the Design and Comparison of Combinatorial Libraries using Pharmacophoric Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 144-150.
24. Böhm, H.-J.; Flohr, A.; Stahl, M. Scaffold hopping. Drug Discovery Today: Technol. 2004, 1, 217-224.
25. Barker, E. J.; Buttar, D.; Cosgrove, D. A.; Gardiner, E. J.; Kitts, P.; Willett, P.; Gillet, V. J. Scaffold Hopping Using Clique Detection Applied to Reduced Graphs. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 503-511.
26. Lauri, G.; Bartlett, P. A. CAVEAT: A program to facilitate the design of organic molecules. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 51-66.