Attentional set mixing: Effects on target selection and selective response activation

Psychophysiology

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 413-421

  Ruge, Hannes ^a   Stoet, Gijsbert ^a   Naumann, Ewald ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Event related lateralization; Event related potentials; Mental chronometry; Mixing cost; Selective attention; Switch cost; Switching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 33746882793     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00419.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
2. Brass, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 908-914.
3. Braver, T. S., Reynolds, J. R., & Donaldson, D. I. (2003). Neural mechanisms of transient and sustained cognitive control during task switching. Neuron, 39, 713-726.
4. Brown, J. W., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science, 307, 1118-1121.
5. Coles, M. G., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1988). Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing. Biological Psychology, 26, 69-89.
6. Coles, M. G., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1995). Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 86-131). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Croft, R. J., Chandler, J. S., Barry, R. J., Cooper, N. R., & Clarke, A. R. (2005). EOG correction: A comparison of four methods. Psychophysiology, 42, 16-24.
8. De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Desimone, R. (1998). Visual attentionmediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1245-1255.
10. Efron, B. (1981). Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other methods. Biometrika, 68, 589-599.
11. Goffaux, P., Phillips, N. A., Sinai, M., & Pushkar, D. (2006). Behavioural and electrophysiological measures of task switching during single andmixed-task conditions. Biological Psychology, 72, 278-290.
12. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for offline removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
13. Hopf, J. M., Boelmans, K., Schoenfeld, M. A., Luck, S. J., & Heinze, H. J. (2004). Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: Evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1822-1832.
14. Hsieh, S. (2006). The lateralized readiness potential and P300 of stimulus-set switching. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 284-291.
15. Hsieh, S., & Liu, L. C. (2005). The nature of switch cost: Task set configuration or carry-over effect? Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 165-175.
16. Hsieh, S., & Yu, Y. T. (2003). Switching between simple response-sets: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 228-237.
17. Jentzsch, I., Leuthold, H., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2004). Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: Parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time? Psychophysiology, 41, 231-244.
18. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89, 1-82.
19. Kieffaber, P. D., & Hetrick, W. P. (2005). Event-related potential correlates of task switching and switch costs. Psychophysiology, 42, 56-71.
20. Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307-323.
21. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be mislead: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 166-174.
22. Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94, 145-188.
23. Luck, S. J., Girelli, M., McDermott, M. T., & Ford, M. A. (1997). Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: An ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 64-87.
24. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1000-1014.
25. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Mechanisms and models of selective attention. In M. D. Rugg & M. G. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 40-85). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
27. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.
28. Michie, P. T., Karayanidis, F., Smith, G. L., Barrett, N. A., Large, M. M., O'Sullivan, B. T., et al. (1999). An exploration of varieties of visual attention: ERP findings. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 419-450.
29. Miller, J., Patterson, T., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-basedmethod for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99-115.
30. Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., & Weaver, B. (1994). Negative priming in a spatial location task: Feature mismatch and distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 624-646.
31. Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.
32. Mordkoff, J. T., & Gianaros, P. J. (2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: A comparison of available methods and procedures. Psychophysiology, 37, 347-360.
33. Nicholson, R., Karayanidis, F., Poboka, D., Heathcote, A., & Michie, P. T. (2005). Electrophysiological correlates of anticipatory task-switching processes. Psychophysiology, 42, 540-554.
34. Osman, A., & Moore, C. M. (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1292-1312.
35. Rabbit, P. (1966). Errors and error-correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
36. R-Development-Core-Team. (2005). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: Author.
37. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
38. Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477-1491.
39. Ruge, H., Brass, M., Koch, I., Rubin, O., Meiran, N., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Advance preparation and stimulus-induced interference in cued task switching: Further insights from BOLD fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43, 340-355.
40. Ruge, H., & Naumann, E. (in press). Brain-electrical correlates of negative location priming under sustained and transient attentional context conditions. Journal of Psychophysiology.
41. Rushworth, M. F., Passingham, R. E., & Nobre, A. C. (2002). Components of switching intentional set. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1139-1150.
42. Slagter, H. A., Kok, A., Mol, N., Talsma, D., & Kenemans, J. L. (2005). Generating spatial and nonspatial attentional control: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 42, 428-439.
43. Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89-103.
44. Tipper, S. P., & McLaren, J. (1990). Evidence for efficient selectivity in children. In J. T. Enns (Ed.), The development of attention: Research and theory (pp. 197-210). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
45. Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., & Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: A meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 22, 1679-1693.
46. Wijers, A. A., Mulder, G., Gunter, T. C., & Smid, H. G. O. M. (1996). Die Hirnelektrische Analyse der selektiven Aufmerksamkeit. In O. Neuman & F. Sanders (Eds.), Aufmerksamkeit. Göttingen: Hogrefe.