|
Volumn 1125, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-171
|
On-fibre solid-phase microextraction coupled to conventional liquid chromatography versus in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled to capillary liquid chromatography for the screening analysis of triazines in water samples
|
Author keywords
Capillary HPLC; Conventional HPLC; In tube; On fibre; SPME; Triazines
|
Indexed keywords
CAPILLARY FLOW;
DESORPTION;
EXTRACTION;
LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;
POLYMERS;
SCREENING;
WATER;
CAPILLARY HPLC;
CONVENTIONAL HPLC;
IN-TUBE;
MICROEXTRACTION;
ON-FIBRE;
SPME;
TRIAZINES;
NITROGEN COMPOUNDS;
AMETRYN;
ATRAZINE;
CYTARABINE 5' STEARYLPHOSPHATE;
DIMETICONE;
DIVINYLBENZENE;
PROMETRYN;
PROPAZINE;
SIMAZINE;
TERBUTRYN;
TRIAZINE DERIVATIVE;
ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS;
ARTICLE;
CAPILLARY CHROMATOGRAPHY;
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS;
CHEMICAL MODEL;
COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY;
DESORPTION;
EVALUATION;
FIBER;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;
MATERIAL COATING;
PARTICLE SIZE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SCREENING;
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;
SEPARATION TECHNIQUE;
SOLID PHASE MICROEXTRACTION;
ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;
WATER ANALYSIS;
WATER POLLUTION;
CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID;
HUMIC SUBSTANCES;
TRIAZINES;
WATER;
|
EID: 33746814857
PISSN: 00219673
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.056 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (48)
|
References (30)
|