Magnetoencephalography is not a substitute for intracranial electroencephalography [3]

Annals of Neurology

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 270-

  Schevon, Catherine ^a   Cappell, Joshua ^a   Emerson, Ronald G ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; LETTER; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33746796680     PISSN: 03645134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ana.20925     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Knowlton RC, Elgavish R, Howell J, et al. Magnetic source imaging versus intracranial electroencephalogram in epilepsy surgery: a prospective study. Ann Neurol 2006;59:835-842.
2. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 1987;32:11-22.
3. Lutkenhoner B. Magnetoencephalography and its Achilles' heel. J Physiol Paris 2003;97:641-658.
4. Pataraia E, Simos PG, Castillo EM, et al. Does magnetoencephalography add to scalp video-EEC as a diagnostic tool in epilepsy surgery? Neurology 2004;62:943-948.
5. Stefan H, Hummel C, Scheler G, et al. Magnetic brain source imaging of focal epileptic activity: a synopsis of 455 cases. Brain 2003;126:2396-2405.
6. Iwasaki M, Pestana E, Burgess RC, et al. Detection of epilepti-form activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Epilepsia 2005;46:59-68.