Spatial relations between floodplain environments and land use - Land cover of a large lowland tropical river valley: Pánuco basin, México

Environmental Management

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 487-503

  Hudson, Paul F ^a   Colditz, René R ^b,c   Aguilar Robledo, Miguel ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ   (Mexico)

Author keywords

ASTER; Floodplain agriculture; Floodplain geomorphology; Land use land cover classification; Moctezuma P nuco, Huasteca, Mexico; Remote sensing

Indexed keywords

ASTER; FLOODPLAIN AGRICULTURE; FLOODPLAIN GEOMORPHOLOGY; LAND USE-LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; MOCTEZUMA-PÁNUCO, HUASTECA, MEXICO;

AGRICULTURE; LAND USE; RIVERS; SATELLITES;

FLOODS;

ASTER; FIELD SURVEY; FLOODPLAIN; HUMAN ACTIVITY; LAND COVER; LAND USE; LANDSAT; LOWLAND ENVIRONMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ACCURACY; AGRICULTURE; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COASTAL PLAIN; DATA ANALYSIS; FARMING SYSTEM; FLOODING; FLOODPLAIN; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN; GEOMORPHOLOGY; GRAZING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LAKE; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; METHODOLOGY; MEXICO; MODEL; OBSERVATION; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; REMOTE SENSING; RIVER; SWAMP; WETLAND;

AGRICULTURE; DISASTERS; GEOGRAPHY; MEXICO; NATURAL DISASTERS; RIVERS; TROPICAL CLIMATE;

AGRICULTURE; FLOODS; LAND USE; RIVERS;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; PANUCO BASIN;

BOS TAURUS;

EID: 33746778750     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: 14321009     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-0157-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abrams, M. 2000. The Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection radiometer (ASTER): Data products for the high spatial resolution imager on NASA's Terra platform. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21:847-859.
2. Aguilar-Robledo, M. 2003a. La territorialidad en el norte de Mesoamérica: El señorío de Oxitipa en el siglo XVI. Letras de América 10:3-18.
3. Aguilar-Robledo, M. 2003b. Formation of the Miraflores Hacienda: Land, indians, and livestock in eastern New Spain at the end of the sixteenth century. Journal of Latin American Geography 2.
4. Anderson J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, R. E. Witmer. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. pp 1-28.
5. Avery, T. E., and G. L Berlin. 1989. Fundamentals of remote sensing and airphoto interpretation. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
6. Bridge, J. S. 2003. Rivers and floodplains: Forms, processes, and sedimentary record. Blackwell, London.
7. Burt, T. P., P. D Bates, M. D. Stewart, A. J. Claxton, M. G. Anderson, and D. A. Price. 2002. Water table fluctuations within the floodplain of the River Severn, England. Journal of Hydrology 262:1-20.
8. Butzer, K. W. 1982. Archaeology as human ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Butzer, K. W., and E. K. Butzer. 1995. Transfer of the Mediterranean livestock economy to New Spain: Adaptations and consequences. Pages 151-193 in B. L. Turner II, A. Gómez Sal, F. González Bernáldez, and F. di Castri (eds.), Global land use: A Perspective from the Columbian encounter. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid.
10. Clark, W. A., and P. L. Hosking. 1986. Statistical methods for geographers. Wiley, New York.
11. Coe, M. D. 2002. Mexico: From the Olmecs to the Aztecs. 4th ed. Thames and Hudson, New York.
12. Colditz, R. R. 2003. Land cover and geomorphological floodplain mapping of the lower Pánuco basin, Mexico, utilizing remote sensing and GIS-methods. Unpublished masters thesis. Diplomarbeit, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany.
13. Congalton, R. G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of the Environment 37:35-46.
14. Congalton, R. G., and K. Green. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: Principles and practice. Lewis, New York.
15. + ETM data. Geocarto International 19:45-56.
16. Doolittle, W. E. 1987. Las Marismas to Pánuco to Texas: The transfer of open range cattle ranching from Iberia through northeastern Mexico. Yearbook, Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 13:3-11.
17. Ekholm, G. F. 1944. Excavations at Tampico and Pánuco in the Huasteca, Mexico, Anthropological papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. XXVII, Part V. American Museum of Natural History, New York.
18. Foody, G. M. 2002. Status of land cover accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of the Environment 80:185-201.
19. Haberman, S. J. 1973. The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics 29:205-220.
20. Hudson, P. F. 2000. Discharge, sediment, and channel characteristics of the Rio Pánuco, Mexico. Yearbook, Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 26:61-70.
21. Hudson, P. F. 2002. Floodplain styles of the lower Pánuco basin, Mexico. Journal of Latin American Geography 1:58-68.
22. Hudson, P. F. 2004. The geomorphic context of the prehistoric Huastec floodplain environments: Pánuco basin, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 31:653-658.
23. Hudson, P. F., and P. R. Colditz. 2003. Flood delineation in a large and complex alluvial valley, lower Pánuco basin, Mexico. Journal of Hydrology 280:229-245.
24. Hudson, P. F., and F. T. Heitmuller. 2003. Local and watershed-scale controls on the spatial variability of natural levee deposits in a large fine-grained floodplain: Lower Pánuco basin, Mexico. Geomorphology 56:255-269.
25. Jensen, J. R. 1996. Introductory digital image processing. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
26. Jordan, T. G. 1989. An Iberian lowland/highland model for Latin American cattle ranching. Journal of Historical Geography 15:111-125.
27. Jordan, T. G. 1993. North American cattle-ranching frontiers. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
28. Kidder, T. R. 1996. Perspectives on the geoarchaology of the Lower Mississippi Valley. Engineering Geology 45:305-323.
29. Langley, S. K., H. M. Cheshire, and K. S. Humes. 2001. A comparison of single data and multitemporal satellite image classifications in a semi-arid grassland. Journal of Arid Environments 49:401-411.
30. Mertes, L. A. K., D. L. Daniel, J. M. Melack, B. Nelson, L. A. Martinelli, and B. R. Forsberg. 1995. Spatial patterns of hydrology, geomorphology, and vegetation on the floodplain of the Amazon River in Brazil from a remote sensing perspective. Geomorphology 13:215-232.
31. Mertes, L. A. K., T. Dunne, and L. A. Martinelli. 1996. Channel-floodplain geomorphology along the Solimões-Amazon River, Brazil. Geological Society of America Bulletin 108:1089-1107.
32. Messina, J. P., and S. J. Walsh. 2001. 2.5 morphogenesis: Modeling landuse and landcover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Plant Ecology 156:75-88.
33. Nanson, G. C., and J. C. Croke. 1992. A genetic classification of floodplains. Geomorpholog 4:459-486.
34. Oetter, D. R., W. B. Cohen, M. Berterretche, T. K. Maiersperger, and R. E. Kennedy. 2000. Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data. Remote Sensing of the Environment 76:139-155.
35. Plate, E. J. 2002. Flood risk and flood management. Journal of Hydrology 267:2-11.
36. Poole, G. C., J. A. Stanford, C. A. Frissell, and S. W. Running. 2002. Three-dimensional mapping of geomorphic controls on flood-plain hydrology and connectivity from aerial photos. Geomorphology 48:329-347.
37. Sanders, W. T. 1978. The Lowland Huasteca archaeological Survey and Excavation: 1957 Field Season. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
38. Saucier, R. T. 1994. Geomorphology and quaternary geologic history of the lower mississippi Valley. Waterways Experiment Station, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
39. Schumm, S. A., J. F. Dumont, and J. M. Holbrook. 2000. Active tectonics and alluvial rivers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Smith, L. M., and B. R. Winkley. 1996. The response of the lower Mississippi River to river engineering. Engineering Geology 45:433-455.
41. Song, C., C. E. Woodcock, K. C. Seto, M. P. Lenney, and S. A. Macomber. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects. Remote Sensing of the Environment 75:230-244.
42. Thoms, M. C. 2003. Floodplain-river ecosystems: Lateral connections and the implications of human interference. Geomorphology 56:335-349.
43. Townsend, P. A., and S. J. Walsh. 2001. Remote sensing of forested wetlands: Application of multitemporal and multispectral satellite imagery to determine plant community composition and structure in southeastern USA. Plant Ecology 157:129-149.
44. Tso, B., and P. M. Mather. 2001. Classification methods for remotely sensed data. Taylor and Francis, London.
45. Walsh, S. E., P. A. Soranno, and D. T. Rutledge. 2003. Lakes, wetlands, and streams as predictors of land use/cover distribution. Environmental Management 31:198-214.
46. Walsh, S. J., D. R. Butler, and G. P. Malanson. 1998. An overview of scale, pattern, process relationships in geomorphology: A remote sensing and GIS perspective. Geomorphology 21:183-205.
47. Yamaguchi, Y., H. Fujisada, M. Kudoh, T. Kawakami, H. Tsu, A. B. Kahle, and M. Pniel. 1999. ASTER instrument characterization and operation scenario. Advances in Space Research 23:1415-1424.
48. Wolman, M. G., and L. B. Leopold. 1957. River flood plains: Some observations on their formation. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-C. Washington, DC 87-109.