Landscape complexity and remote classification in eastern coastal Mexico: Applications of Landsat-7 ETM+ data

Geocarto International

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 45-56

  Crews Meyer, Kelley A ^a   Hudson, Paul F ^a   Colditz, René R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872350674     PISSN: 10106049     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10106040408542298     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aguilar-Robledo, M. 1999. Land use, land tenure, and environmental change in the jurisdiction of Santiago de Los Valles de Oxitipa, Eastern New Spain, sixteenth to eighteenth century. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Texas at Austin: 461p.
2. Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T., Witmer, R.E., 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. United States Government printing office, Washington D.C., 1-28
3. Arbuckle, C.J., Huryn, A.D., Israel, S.A. 1999. Landcover classification in the Taieri River catchment, New Zealand: a focus on the riparian zone. Geocarto International. 14: 7-13
4. Crist, E.P. and Cicone, R.C. 1984. Application of the Tasseled Cap concept to simulated Thematic Mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 50: 343-352.
5. Congalton, R.G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 37: 35-46.
6. Congalton, R.G. and Green, K. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data-principles and practice. Lewis Publishers, N.Y.: 137p.
7. De Bruin, S., Gorte, B.G.H. 2000. Probabilistic image classification using geological map units applied to land-cover change detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 21.
8. DeMers, M.N. 2000. Fundamentals of geographic information systems. John Wiley and Sons. N.Y., 498p.
9. Dymond, C.C., Mladenoff, D.J., and Radeloff, V.C. 2002. Phenological differences in Tasseled Cap indices improve deciduous forest classification. Remote Sensing of Environment. 80:460-472.
10. ERDAS Field Guide. 1999. ERDAS Field Guide. ERDAS, Inc. Atlanta, Ga.: 672.
11. Fitzpatrick-Lins, K. 1981. Comparison of sampling procedures and data analysis for a land-use and land-cover map. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing. 47: 343-351.
12. Foody, G.M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment. 80: 185-201.
13. Gorte, B., Stein, A. 1998. Bayesian classification and class area estimation of satellite images using stratification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing. 36: 803-813.
14. Gross, H.N. and Schott, J.R. 1998. Application of Spectral Mixture Analysis and Image Fusion Techniques for Image Sharpening. Remote Sensing of Environment. 63: 85-94.
15. Grubb, H.F. and Carillo, J.J.R. 1988. Region 23, Gulf of Mexico Coastal plain. in Back, W., Roshein, J.S., and Seaber, P.R. (eds.): Hydrogeology, The Geology of North America.: O-2, Geological Society of North America, Boulder, Co.: 219-228.
16. Hendrickson, D.A., Hudson, P.F., Rodiles-Hernandez, R., and Minckley, W.L. (forthcoming 2003). Mexican Atlantic Slope Rivers. in A.C. Benke and Cushing C.E. (eds.) Rivers of North America. Academic Press.
17. Hudson, P.F. 2000. Discharge, sediment, and channel characteristics of the Rio Panuco, Mexico. Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers, Yearbook. 26: 61-70.
18. Hudson, P.F. 2002. Event sequence and sediment exhaustion in the lower Panuco basin, eastern Mexico. Catena. 52(1): 57-76.
19. Hudson, P.F. in press. The influence of the El Nino Southern Oscillation on sediment yield in the Lower Pánuco Basin, Mexico.
20. Geografiska Annaler. Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geographía e Informática (INEGI), 1984a. Carta Geologica, 1:250,000, Ciudad Mante. (F14-5). Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geographía e Informatica (INEGI), 1984b. Carta Geologica, 1:250,000, Ciudad Valles. (F14-8).
21. Jauregui, E. 1995. Rainfall fluctuations and tropical storm activity in Mexico. Erdkunde. 49: 39-48.
22. Jensen, J.R. 1996. Introductory digital image processing. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: 316.
23. Jensen, J.R. 2000. Remote sensing of the environment. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: 544.
24. Kauth, R.J. and Thomas, G.S. 1976. The Tasseled Cap-a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Proceedings, Symposium on machine processing of remotely sensed data. West Lafayette, IN: Laboratory for application of remote sensing: 41-51.
25. Li, S., Kwok, J.T., and Wang, Y. 2002. Using the discrete wavelet frame transform to merge Landsat TM and SPOT panchromatic images. Information Fusion. 3: 17-23.
26. Lillesand, T.M. and Kiefer, R.W. 2000. Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley and Sons, NY: 724p.
27. Mather, P.M. 1999. Computer processing of remotely processed images: an introduction. John Wiley and Sons. Chichester: 292p.
28. McRoberts, R.E., Wendt, D.G., Nelson, M.D., and Hansen, M.H. 2002. Using a land cover classification based on satellite imagery to improve the precision of forest inventory area estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment. 81: 36-44.
29. Messina J.P., Crews-Meyer, K.A. and Walsh, S.J. 2000. Scale dependent pattern metrics and panel data analysis as applied in a multiphase hybrid landcover classification scheme. Proceedings of 2000 ASPRS Conference.
30. Messina, J.P. and Walsh, S.J. 2001. 2.5D Morphogenesis: modeling landuse and landcover dynamics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Plant Ecology. 156: 75-88.
31. Metcalfe, S.E. 1987. Historical data and climate change in Mexico-A review, The Geographical Journal. 153: 211-222.
32. Miguel-Ayanz, J.S. and Biging, G.S. 1997. Comparison of singlestage and multi-stage classification approaches for cover type mapping with TM and SPOT data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 59: 92-104.
33. Miura, T., Huete, A.R., Yoshioka, H., and Holben, B.N. 2001. An error and sensitivity analysis of atmospheric resistant vegetation indices derived from dark target-based atmospheric correction. Remote Sensing of Environment. 78: 284-298
34. Muir, J.M. 1936. Geology of the Tampico Region, Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Ok.: 280p.
35. Munyati, C. 2000. Wetland change detection on the Kafue Flats, Zambia, by classification of a multitemporal remote sensing image dataset. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 21: 1787-1807.
36. Oetter, D.R., Cohen, W.B., Berterretche, M., Maiersperger, T.K., and Kennedy, R.E. 2001. Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal Thematic Mapper data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 76: 139-155.
37. Pax-Lenney, M., Woodcock, C.E., Macomber, S.A., Gopal, S., and Song, C. 2001. Forest mapping with a generalized classifier and Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 77: 241-250.
38. Sader, S.A., Ahl, D., Liou, W. 1995. Accuracy of Landsat-TM and GIS rule based methods for forest wetland classification in Maine. Remote Sensing of Environment. 53: 133-144.
39. Song, C. Woodcock, C.E., Seto, K.C., Lenney, M.P., Macomber, S.A. 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: when and how to correct atmospheric effects, Remote Sensing of Environment, 75: 230-244.
40. Stefanov, W.L., Ramsey, M.S., Christensen, P.R. 2001. Monitoring urban land cover change: an expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers. Remote Sensing of Environment. 77: 173-185
41. Stewart, J.S. 1994. Assessment of alternative methods for stratifying Landsat TM data to improve land cover classification accuracy across areas with physiographic variation. MS thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
42. Townsend, P.A., and Walsh, S.J. 2001. Remote sensing of forested wetlands: application of multitemporal and multispectral satellite imagery to determine plant community composition and structure in southeastern USA. Plant Ecology. 157: 129-149.
43. Tso, B. and Mather, P.M. 2001. Classification methods for remotely sensed data. Taylor and Francis. London and New York: 332.
44. Tu, T., Su, S., Shyu, H., and Huang, P.S. 2001. A new look at IHS-like image fusion methods. Information Fusion. 2: 177-186.
45. Walsh, S.J., Crawford, T.W., Welsh, W.F., and Crews-Meyer, K.A. 2001a. A multiscale analysis of LULC and NDVI variation in Nang Rong district, northeast Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 83: 47-64
46. Walsh, S.J., Messina, J.P., Crews-Meyer, K.A., Bilsborrow, R.E., and Pan, W.K.Y. 2001b. Characterizing and modeling patterns of deforestation and agricultural extensification in the Ecuadorian Amazon. in Walsh, S.J. and K.A. Crews-Meyer, eds., Linking People, Place, and Policy: A GIScience Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
47. West, R.C. and Augelli, J.P. 1989. Middle America, its land and peoples. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: 494.