A protocol for arguing about rejections in negotiation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4049 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 138-153

  Van Veenen, Jelle ^a   Prakken, Henry ^b,c  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; GAME THEORY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

ARGUMENT-BASED NEGOTIATION; NEGOTIATION; PROTOCOL; REJECTION;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746755941     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11794578_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S., Jennings, N., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18 (2003) 343-375
2. Singh, M.: Agent communication languages: rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer 31 (1998) 40-47
3. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., Maudet, N.: Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2000) 338-342
4. Wooldridge, M., Parsons, S.: Languages for negotiation. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (2000) 393-400
5. Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation, Journal of Logic and Computation 15 (2005) to appear.
6. Prakken, H.: On dialogue systems with speech acts, arguments, and counterarguments. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Logic for. Artificial Intelligence (JELIA'2000). Number 1919 in Springer Lecture Notes in AI, Berlin, Springer Verlag (2000) 224-238
7. Walton, D., Krabbe, E.: Commitment in Dialogue. Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY (1995)
8. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and complexity of some formal inter-agent dialogues. Journal of Logic and Computation 13 (2003) 347-376.
9. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logics for defeasible argumentation. In Gabbay, D., Güathner, F., eds.: Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Volume 4. Second edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London (2002) 219-318
10. Dung, P.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-pcrson games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357
11. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics 7 (1997) 25-75
12. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A model of reasoning based on the production of acceptable argument. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34 (2002) 197-216
13. Pollock, J.: Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1995)
14. Dung, P.: Logic programming as dialog game. Unpublished paper, Division of Computer Science, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok (1994)
15. Mackenzie, J.: Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1979) 117-133
16. McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2002) 315-343
17. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104 (1998) 1-69
18. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 8 (1998) 261-292
19. Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1996)
20. Bex, F., Prakken, H., Reed, C., Walton, D.: Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (2003) 125-165