Shared cognition and participation in small groups: Similarity of member prototypes

Communication Research

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 704-730

  Bonito, Joseph A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Information processing; Multilevel analysis; Participation; Prototype

Indexed keywords

EID: 9544219677     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650204269406     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Berger, C. R. (2002). Strategic and nonstrategic information acquisition. Human Communication Research, 28, 287-297.
3. Bonito, J. A. (2001). An information-processing approach to participation in small groups. Communication Research, 28, 275-303.
4. Bonito, J. A. (2002). The analysis of participation in small groups: Methodological and conceptual issues related to interdependence. Small Group Research, 33, 412-438.
5. Bonito, J. A. (2003a). Information processing and exchange in mediated groups: Interdependence and interaction. Human Communication Research, 29, 533-559.
6. Bonito, J. A. (2003b). A social relations analysis of participation in small groups. Communication Monographs, 70, 83-97.
7. Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 227-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Bonito, J. A., & Wolski, S. L. (2002). The adaptation of complaints to participation frameworks. Communication Studies, 53, 252-268.
9. Burgoon, J. K. (1995). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 194-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Burgoon, J. K., & Burgoon, M. (2001). Expectancy theories. In P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 79-101). Sussex, UK: Wiley.
11. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
12. Burgoon, J. K., & LePoire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20, 67-96.
13. Burgoon, J. K., & Walther, J. B. (1990). Nonverbal expectancies and the evaluative consequences of violations. Human Communication Research, 17, 232-265.
14. Burgoon, M., & Hall, J. R. (1991). Compliance and satisfaction with physician-patient communication: An expectancy theory interpretation of gender differences. Human Communication Research, 18, 177-208.
15. Burke, P. J. (1974). Participation and leadership in small groups. American Sociological Review, 39, 832-843.
16. Burleson, B. R., & Caplan, S. (1998). Cognitive complexity. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.), Communication and personality trait perspectives (pp. 233-286). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
17. Burleson, B. R., & Waltman, M. S. (1988). Cognitive complexity: Using the Role Category Questionnaire measure. In C. H. Tardy (Ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication: Methods and instruments for observing, measuring, and assessing communicative processes (pp. 1-35). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 330-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Coleman, J. S. (1960). The mathematical study of small groups. In H. Solomon (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the measurement of behavior (pp. 7-149). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
22. Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Ruback, R. B. (1987). Dimensions of group process: Amount and structure of group interaction. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Delia, J. G., Gonyea, A. H., & Crockett, W. H. (1971). The effects of subject-generated and normative constructs upon the formation of impressions. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 301-305.
24. Edelsky, C. (1993). Who's got the floor? In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 189-227). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Eden, D., & Leviatan, U. (1975). Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 736-741.
26. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Folger, J. P., Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 115-161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Gill, S. J., Menlo, A., & Keel, L. P. (1984). Antecedents to member participation within small groups: A review of theory and research. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 9, 68-76.
29. Glover, K. D. (1995). A prototype view of context and linguistic behavior: Context prototypes and talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 137-156.
30. Goldsmith, D. J. (1999). Content-based resources for giving face sensitive advice in troubles talk episodes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 303-336.
31. Gouran, D. S. (2003). Communication skills for group decision making. In J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 835-870). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1996). Functional theory and communication in decision-making and problem-solving groups: An expanded view. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 55-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Gruenfeld, D. H, Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y, & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15.
34. Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47-58.
35. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
36. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 292-316.
37. John, O. P., Pals, J. L., & Westenberg, P. M. (1998). Personality prototypes and ego development: Conceptual similarities and relations in adult women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1093-1108.
38. Kameda, T., Ohtsubo, Y, & Takezawa, M. (1997). Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence: An illustration in a group decision-making context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 296-309.
39. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
40. Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Kenny, D. A., & Cook, W. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433-448.
42. Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 126-137.
43. Kreft, I. G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1-21.
44. Lambert, B. L. (2001). Automatic content analysis of pharmacist-patient interactions using the Theme Machine document clustering system. In M. West (Ed.),Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 17: Applications of computer content analysis (pp. 103-122). Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Westport, CT.
45. Larson, J. R. (1997). Modeling the entry of shared and unshared information into group discussion: A review and BASIC language computer program. Small Group Research, 28, 454-479.
46. Larson, J. R., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. (1994). Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 446-461.
47. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
48. LePine, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Hedlund, J. (1997). Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 803-811.
49. Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior Special Issue: Shared Cognition, 22, 135-144.
50. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1991). Culture and socialization in work groups. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 257-279). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
51. Levy, D. M. (1979). Communicative goals and strategies: Between discourse and syntax. In T. Givon (Ed. ), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and semantics (pp. 183-212). New York: Academic Press.
52. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 9, pp. 237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
53. Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 11-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. O'Keefe, B. J., & Lambert, B. L. (1995). Managing the flow of ideas: A local management approach to message design. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 18 (pp. 54-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56. Parker, K. H. C. (1988). Speaking turns in small group interaction: A context-sensitive event sequence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 965-971.
57. Pavitt, C., & Curtis, E. (1994). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
58. Pavitt, C., & Haight, L. ( 1985). The "competent communicator" as a cognitive prototype. Human Communication Research, 12, 225-241.
59. Pavitt, C., Whitchurch, G. G., & McClurg, H. (1995). Melding the objective and subjective sides of leadership: Communication and social judgments in decision making groups. Communication Monographs, 62, 243-264.
60. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. (2001). Why do "great minds" think alike?: Antecedents of team member scheme agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 107-120.
62. Salton, G. ( 1988). Automatic text processing: The transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
63. Sanders, R. E. (1987). Cognitive foundations of calculated speech. Albany: State University of New York Press.
64. Sanders, R. E. (1997). The production of symbolic objects as components of larger wholes. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 245-278). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Sargis, E. G., & Larson, J. R. (2002). Informational centrality and member participation during group decision making. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 333-347.
66. Sigman, S. J. (1984). Talk and interaction strategy in a task-oriented group. Small Group Research, 15, 33-51.
67. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
68. Spark Jones, K. (1979). Experiments in relevance weighting of search terms. Information Processing and Management, 35, 30-48.
69. Stasser, G. (1998). A primer of social decision scheme theory: Models of group influence, competitive model-testing, and prospective modeling. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 3-20.
70. Weiner, S. L., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). A move toward a psychology of conversation. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.),Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 213-225). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
71. Weiss, H. M., & Adler, S. (1981). Cognitive complexity and the structure of implicit leadership theories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 69-78.
72. Williams, K. D., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.
73. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.