Mathematical modeling of plate-gap biosensors with an outer porous membrane

Sensors

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 727-745

  Baronas, Romas ^a   Ivanauskas, Feliksas ^a   Kaunietis, Irmantas ^a   Laurinavicius, Valdas ^a  

^a VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Biosensor; Modeling; Reaction diffusion; Simulation

Indexed keywords

BIOSENSORS; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; ELECTRODES; ENZYME ELECTRODES; ENZYMES; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MODELS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL MODELS; REACTION KINETICS; REACTION RATES;

ANALYTE CONCENTRATION; BIOSENSOR RESPONSE; FINITE-DIFFERENCE TECHNIQUES; MICHAELIS-MENTEN KINETIC; POROUS MEMBRANES; REACTION DIFFUSION; REACTION DIFFUSION EQUATIONS; SIMULATION;

POROUS PLATES;

EID: 33746584406     PISSN: 14243210     EISSN: 14248220     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s6070727     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Clare, L. C.; Loys, C. Electrode system for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1962, 102, 29-45.
2. Scheller, F.; Schubert, F. Biosensors; Vol. 7, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988.
3. Turner, A.P.F.; Karube, I.; Wilson, G.S. Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1987.
4. Chaubey, A.; Malhotra, B.D. Mediated biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2002, 17, 441-456.
5. Rogers, K.R. Biosensors for environmental applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1995, 10, 533-541.
6. Wollenberger, U.; Lisdat, F.; Scheller, F.W. Frontiers in Biosensorics 2. Practical Applications; Birkhauser Verlag: Basel, 1997.
7. Fraser D.M. (Editor) Biosensors in the Body: Continuous in vivo Monitoring; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1997.
8. Treloar, P.H.; Christie I.M.; Vadgama, P.M. Engineering the right membranes for electrodes at the biological interface; solvent cast and electropolymerised. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1995, 10, 195-201
9. Antiochia, R.; Lavagnini, I.; Magno, F. Amperometric mediated carbon nanotube paste biosensor for fructose determination. Anal. Let. 2004, 37, 1657-1669.
10. Schöning, M.J. "Playing around" with field-effect sensors on the basis of EIS structures, LAPS and ISFETs. Sensors 2005, 5, 126-138.
11. Laurinavicius, V.A.; Kulys, J.J.; Gureviciene, V.V.; Simonavicius, K.J. Flow-through and cateter biosensors with an extended concentration range. Biomed. Biochem. Acta. 1989, 48, 905-909.
12. Lyons, M.E.G.; Murphy, J.; Rebouillat, S. Theoretical analysis of time dependent diffusion, reaction and electromigration in membranes. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2000, 4, 458-472.
13. Kulys, J. The development of new analytical systems based on biocatalysts. Anal. Lett. 1981, 14, 377-397.
14. Schulmeister, T. Mathematical treatment of concentration profiles and anodic current of amperometric enzyme electrodes with chemically-amplified response. Anal. Chim. Acta 1987, 201, 305-310.
15. Bartlett, P.N.; Pratt, K.F.E. Modelling of processes in enzyme electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1993, 8, 451-462.
16. Sorochinskii, V.V.; Kurganov, B.I. Steady-state kinetics of cyclic conversions of substrate in amperometric bienzyme sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1996, 11, 225-238.
17. Baronas, R.; Ivanauskas, F.; Kulys, J. The influence of the enzyme membrane thickness on the response of amperometric biosensors. Sensors 2003, 3, 248-262.
18. Ivanauskas, F.; Kaunietis, I.; Laurinavicius, V.; Razumiene, J.; Simkus, R. Computer simulation of the steady state currents at enzyme doped carbon paste electrode. J. Math. Chem. 2005, 38, 355-366.
19. Schulmeister, T. Mathematical modeling of the dynamic behaviour of amperometric enzyme electrodes. Selective Electrode Rev. 1990, 12, 203-206.
20. Baronas, R.; Ivanauskas, F.; Survila, A. Simulation of electrochemical behavior of partially blocked electrodes under linear potential sweep conditions. J. Math. Chem. 2000, 27, 267-278.
21. Baronas, R.; Ivanauskas, F.; Kulys, J. Mathematical modeling of biosensors based on an array of enzyme microreactors. Sensors 2006, 6, 453-465.
22. Bakhvalov, N.S.; Panasenko, G.P. Homogenization: Averaging Processes in Periodic Media; Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
23. Schulmeister, T.; Pfeiffer, D. Mathematical modelling of amperometric enzyme electrodes with perforated membranes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1993, 8, 75-79.
24. Baronas, R.; Ivanauskas, F.; Kulys, J. Computer simulation of the response of amperometric biosensors in stirred and non stirred solution. Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control 2003, 8, 3-18.
25. Britz, D. Digital Simulation in Electrochemistry; 2nd ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
26. Bieniasz, L.K.; Britz, D. Recent developments in digital simulation of electroanalytical experiments. Polish J. Chem. 2004, 78, 1195-1219.
27. Samarskii, A.A. The Theory of Difference Schemes; New York-Basel: Marcel Dekker, 2001.
28. Moreira, J.E.; Midkiff, S.P.; Gupta, M; Artigas, P.V.; Snir, M.; Lawrence, R.D. Java programming for high performance numerical computing. IBM Systems J. 2000, 39, 21-56.
29. Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975
30. Bartlett, P.N.; Birkin, P.R.; Wallace, E.N.K. Oxidation ofβ-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) at poly(aniline)-coated electrodes. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 1951-1960.
31. Laurinavicius, V.; Razumiene, J.; A. Ramanavicius, A.; Ryabov, A.D. Wiring of PQQ-dehydrogenases. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 20, 1217-1222.