Improvement of phase information at low sound frequency in nucleus magnocellularis of the chicken

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 633-641

  Fukui, Iwao ^a,b   Sato, Tatsuo ^a   Ohmori, Harunori ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; IN VIVO STUDY; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; SPIKE WAVE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; BASAL NUCLEUS OF MEYNERT; CHICKENS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS; HEARING; NERVE FIBERS; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 33746582329     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00916.2005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brenowitz S and Trussell LO. Maturation of synaptic transmission at endbulb synapses of the cochlear nucleus. J Neurosci 21: 9487-9498, 2001.
2. Carr CE and Boudreau RE. Central projections of auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl. J Comp Neurol 314: 306-318, 1991.
3. Carr CE and Konishi M. A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci 10: 3227-3246, 1990.
4. Fukui I and Ohmori H. Tonotopic gradients of membrane and synaptic properties for neurons of the chicken nucleus magnocellularis. J Neurosci 24: 7514-7523, 2004.
5. Goldberg JM and Brown PB. Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. J Neurophysiol 32: 613-636, 1969.
6. Irvine DRF. Auditory nerve input to central processor. In: Progress in Sensory Physiology, edited by Autrum H, Ottoson D, Perl ER, Schmidt RF, Shimazu H, and Willis WD. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1986, p. 22-39.
7. Jeffress LA. A place theory of sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psychol 41: 35-39, 1948.
8. Joris PX, Carney LH, Smith PH, and Yin TC. Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency. J Neurophysiol 71: 1022-1036, 1994.
9. Kiang NYS. Spontaneous activity. In: Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965, p. 93-104.
10. Kiang NYS. Curious oddments of auditory-nerve studies. Hear Res 49: 1-16, 1990.
11. Kopp-Scheinpflug C, Dehmel S, Dörrscheidt GJ, and Rübsamen R. Interaction of excitation and inhibition in anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons that receive large endbulb synaptic endings. J Neurosci 22: 11004-11018, 2002.
12. Köppl C. Auditory nerve terminals in the cochlear nucleus magnocellularis: differences between low and high frequencies. J Comp Neurol 339: 438-446, 1994.
13. Köppl C. Phase locking to high frequencies in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl, Tyto alba. J Neurosci 17: 3312-3321, 1997.
14. Köppl C and Carr CE. Low-frequency pathway in the barn owl's auditory brain stem. J Comp Neurol 378: 265-282, 1997.
15. Lachica EA, Rübsamen R, and Rubel EW. GABAergic terminals in nucleus magnocellularis and nucleus laminaris originate from the superior olivary nucleus. J Comp Neurol 348: 403-418, 1994.
16. Liberman MC. Central projections of auditory-nerve fibers of differing spontaneous rate. I. Anteroventral cochlear nucleus. J Comp Neurol 313: 240-258, 1991.
17. Manley GA, Kaiser A, Brix J, and Gleich O. Activity patterns of primary auditory-nerve fibers in chickens: development of fundamental properties. Hear Res 57: 1-15, 1991.
18. Monsivais P, Yang L, and Rubel EW. GABAergic inhibition in nucleus magnocellularis: implications for phase locking in the avian auditory brain stem. J Neurosci 20: 2954-2963, 2000.
19. Overholt EM, Rubel EW, and Hyson RL. A circuit for coding interaural time differences in the chick brain stem. J Neurosci 12: 1698-1708, 1992.
20. Parks TN and Rubel EW. Organization and development of the brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: primary afferent projections. J Comp Neurol 180: 39-448, 1978.
21. Rathouz M and Trussell L. Characterization of outward currents in neurons of the avian nucleus magnocellularis. J Neurophysiol 80: 2824-2835, 1998.
22. Rhode WS and Greenberg S. Physiology of the cochlear nuclei. In: The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology, edited by Popper AN and Fay RR. New York: Springer, 1992, p. 94-152.
23. Ryugo DK and Sento S. Synaptic connections of the auditory nerve in cats: relationship between endbulbs of held and spherical bushy cells. J Comp Neurol 305: 35-48, 1991.
24. Saunders JC, Ventetuolo CE, Plontke SK, and Weiss BA. Coding of sound intensity in the chick cochlear nerve. J Neurophysiol 88: 2887-2898, 2002.
25. Salvi RJ, Saunders SS, Powers NL, and Boettcher FA. Discharge patterns of cochlear ganglion neurons in the chicken. J Comp Physiol [A] 170: 227-241, 1992.
26. Sento S and Ryugo DK. Endbulbs of held and spherical bushy cells in cats: morphological correlates with physiological properties. J Comp Neurol 280: 553-562, 1989.
27. Sullivan WE and Konishi M. Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J Neurosci 4: 1787-1799, 1984.
28. Warchol ME and Dallos P. Neural response to very low-frequency sound in the avian cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol [A] 166: 83-95, 1989.
29. Warchol ME and Dallos P. Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus. J Comp Physiol [A] 166: 721-734, 1990.
30. Zhang S and Trussell LO. A characterization of excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the avian nucleus magnocellularis. J Neurophysiol 72: 705-718, 1994.