Impact of methionine sources on performance in turkeys

Journal of Applied Poultry Research

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 296-305

  Hoehler, D ^a   Lemme, A ^b   Roberson, K ^c   Turner, K ^d  

^a Degussa Corporation   (United States)

^b EVONIK INDUSTRIES AG   (Germany)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Akey   (United States)

Author keywords

Amino acid; Bioefficacy; Exponential regression; Methionine source; Turkey

Indexed keywords

AVES; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 20444371608     PISSN: 10566171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/japr/14.2.296     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Esteve-Garcia, E., and R. E. Austic. 1993. Intestinal absorption and renal excretion of dietary methionine sources by the growing chicken. J. Nutr. Biochem. 4:576-587.
2. Esteve-Garcia, E., and L. Llaurado. 1997. Performance, breast meat yield and abdominal fat deposition of male broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with DL-methionine or DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid. Br. Poult. Sci. 38:397-404.
3. Hoehler, D., S. K. Jensen, and A. Lemme. 2003. Estimation of relative effectiveness of different methionine sources in broiler chickens using non-linear regression. Poult. Sci. 82(Suppl. 1):166. (Abstr.)
4. Hoehler, D., A. Lemme, D. Marvil, and P. W. Waldroup. 2004. Estimation of relative effectiveness of methionine sources in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 83:1769-1770.
5. Huyghebaert, G. 1993. Comparison of DL-methionine and methionine hydroxy analog-free acid in broilers by using multi-exponential regression models. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:351-359.
6. Lemme, A., D. Hoehler, J. J. Brennan, and P. F. Mannion. 2002. Relative effectiveness of methionine hydroxy analog compared with DL-methionine in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 81:838-845.
7. Rostagno, H. S., and W. A. Barbosa. 1995. Biological efficacy and absorption of DL-methionine hydroxy analog free acid compared with DL-methionine in chickens as affected by heat stress. Br. Poult. Sci. 36:303-312.
8. Schutte, J. B., and J. de Jong. 1996. Biological efficacy of DL-methionine hydroxy analog-free acid compared with DL-methionine in broiler chicks as determined by performance and breast meat yield. Agribiol. Res. 49:74-82.
9. Thomas, O. P., C. Tamplin, S. D. Crissey, E. Bossard, and A. Zuckerman. 1991. An evaluation of methionine hydroxy analog free acid using a nonlinear (exponential) bioassay. Poult. Sci. 70:605-610.
10. Van Weerden, E. J., J. B. Schutte, and H. L. Bertram. 1992. Utilization of the polymers of methionine hydroxy analogue free acid (MHA-FA) in broiler chicks. Arch. Geflügelkd. 56:63-68.
11. Wallis, I. R. 1999. Dietary supplements of methionine increase breast meat yield and decrease abdominal fat in growing broiler chickens. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 39:131-141.
12. +-dependent systems in the brush border membrane of the chick intestinal epithelium. J. Nutr. 126:529-536.
13. Maenz, D. D., and C. M. Engele-Schaan. 1996. Methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid are partially converted to nonabsorbed compounds during passage through the small intestine and heat exposure does not affect small intestinal absorption of methionine sources in broiler chicks. J. Nutr. 126:1438-1444.
14. Drew, M. D., A. G. Van Kessel, and D. D. Maenz. 2003. Absorption of methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid in conventional and germ-free chickens. Poultry Sci. 82:1149-1153.
15. Jansman, A. J. M., C. A. Kan, and J. Wiebenga. 2003. Comparison of the biological efficacy of DL-methionine and hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid (HMB) in pigs and poultry. Documentation Rep. No. 29. Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB, Central Bureau for Livestock Feeding), Lelystad, The Netherlands.
16. Noll, S. L., P. E. Waibel, R. D. Cook, and J. A. Witmer. 1984. Biopotency of methionine sources for young turkeys. Poult. Sci. 63:2458-2470.
17. Blair, M. E. 1983. Methionine bioassays and methionine-choline-sulfate relationship in practical-type diets for young turkeys. MS Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
18. Hybrid Turkeys, Kitchener ON, Canada.
19. Degussa AG, Feed Additives, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany.
20. Novus International Inc., St. Louis, MO.
21. NRC. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
22. Adisseo North America, Alpharetta, GA.
23. British United Turkeys of America, Inc., Lewisburg, WV.
24. Llames, C. R., and J. Fontaine. 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int. 77:1362-1402.
25. Naumann, C., R. Bassler, R. Seibold, and C. Barth. 1997. Methodenbuch Band III. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
26. Littell, R. C., P. R. Henry, A. J. Lewis, and C. B. Ammermann. 1997. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2672-2683.
27. Lehmann, D., M. Pack, and H. Jeroch. 1996. Responses of growing and finishing turkeys to dietary lysine. Poult. Sci. 75:711-718.
28. Nufer, H. L. 1955. Preparation of methionine analogues. US Patent No. 3,272,860, Assignee: Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO.