Novel method for cell debris removal in the flow cytometric cell cycle analysis using carboxy-fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 552-554

  Terho, Perttu ^a   Lassila, Olli ^a  

^a Department of Medical Microbiology ^*  (Finland)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; CFSE; Debris; Identification; Propidium iodide

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE SUCCINIMIDYL ESTER; PROPIDIUM IODIDE; 5 (6) CARBOXYFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE SUCCINIMIDYL ESTER; 5-(6)-CARBOXYFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE SUCCINIMIDYL ESTER; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE; FLUORESCENT DYE; SUCCINIMIDE DERIVATIVE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL CELL; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; B CELL LYMPHOMA; CELL ASSAY; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL DEBRIS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL POPULATION; CELL SELECTION; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEBRIS REMOVAL USING INTRANUCLEAR PROTEIN STAINING; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GAMMA IRRADIATION; GATED IMAGING; HISTOGRAM; INCUBATION TIME; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL DETECTION; STAINING; TECHNIQUE; ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE; METABOLISM; TUMOR CELL LINE;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL NUCLEUS; CHICKENS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCEINS; FLUORESCENT DYES; LYMPHOMA, B-CELL; STAINING AND LABELING; SUCCINIMIDES;

EID: 33746573175     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20261     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Darzynkiewicz Z, Juan G, Li X, Gorczyca W, Murakami T, Traganos F. Cytometry in cell necrobiology: analysis of apoptosis and accidental cell death (necrosis). Cytometry 1997;27:1-20.
2. Heiden T, Castro J, Graf BM, Tribukait B. Comparison of routine flow cytometric DNA analysis of fresh tissues in two laboratories: effects of differences in preparation methods and background models of cell cycle calculation. Cytometry 1998;34:187-197.
3. Bagwell CB, Mayo SW, Whetstone SD, Hitchcox SA, Baker DR, Herbert DJ, Weaver DL, Jones MA, Lovett EJ, III. DNA histogram debris theory and compensation. Cytometry 1991;12:107-118.
4. Bergers E, Baak JP, van Diest PJ, van Gorp LH, Kwee WS, Los J, Peterse HL, Ruitenberg HM, Schapers RF, Somsen JG, van Beek MW, Bellot SM, Fijnheer J. Prognostic implications of different cell cycle analysis models of flow cytometric DNA histograms of 1,301 breast cancer patients: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP). Int J Cancer 1997;74:260-269.
5. Bergers E, van Diest PJ, Baak JP. Comparison of five cell cycle analysis models applied to 1414 flow cytometric DNA histograms of fresh frozen breast cancer. Cytometry 1997;30:54-60.
6. Baldetorp B, Stal O, Ahrens O, Cornelisse C, Corver W, Falkmer U, Ferno M. Different calculation methods for flow cytometric S-phase fraction: prognostic implications in breast cancer? The Swedish Society of Cancer Study Group. Cytometry 1998;33:385-393.
7. Parish CR. Fluorescent dyes for lymphocyte migration and proliferation studies. Immunol Cell Biol 1999;77:499-508.
8. Lyons AB, Parish CR. Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 1994;171:131-137.
9. Hasbold J, Hodgin P. Flow cytometric cell division tracking using nuclei. Cytometry 2000;40:230-237.
10. Sepulveda H, Adheleid C, Morgan T, Dutton W. CD28, IL-2-independent costimulatory pathways for CD8 T lymphocyte activation. J Immunol 1999;163:1133-1142.
11. Baba TW, Giroir BP, Humphries EH. Cell lines derived from avian lymphomas exhibit two distinct phenotypes. Virology 1985;144:139-151.
12. Lahti JM. Use of gene knockouts in cultured cells to study apoptosis. Methods 1999;17:305-312.