Inherited differences in foraging behaviour in the offspring of two forms of lacustrine brook charr

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 843-857

  Sacotte, S ^a   Magnan, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity pattern; Brook charr; Capture rate; Foraging behaviour; Morphology; Swimming behaviour; Trophic polymorphism

Indexed keywords

DAPHNIA; DAPHNIA SP.; GLYCERIDAE; SALVELINUS FONTINALIS;

EID: 33746532297     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams, C.E. and Huntingford, F.A. 2002. The functional significance of inherited differences in feeding morphology in a sympatric polymorphic population of Arctic charr. Evol. Ecol., 16: 15-25.
2. Adams, C.E., Fraser, D., Huntingford, F.A., Greer, R.B., Askew, C.M. and Walker, A.F. 1998. Trophic polymorphism amongst Arctic charr from Loch Rannoch, Scotland. J. Fish Biol., 52: 1259-1271.
3. Adams, C.E., Woltering, C. and Alexander, G. 2003. Epigenetic regulation of trophic morphology through feeding behaviour in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 78: 43-49.
4. th edn. Washington, DC APHA Press.
5. Bourke, P., Magnan, P. and Rodriguez, M.A. 1997. Individual variations in habitat use and morphology in brook charr. J. Fish Biol., 51: 783-794.
6. Bourke, P., Magnan, P. and Rodriguez, M.A. 1999. Phenotypic responses of lacustrine brook charr in relation to the intensity of interspecific competition. Evol. Ecol., 13: 19-31.
7. Day, T.J. and McPhail, J.D. 1996. The effect of behavioural and morphological plasticity on foraging efficiency in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus sp.) Oecologia, 108: 380-388.
8. Dill, L.M. 1983. Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behavior of fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 40: 398-408.
9. Drucker, E.G. and Lauder, G.V. 2003. Function of pectoral fins in rainbow trout: behavioral repertoire and hydrodynamic forces. J. Exp. Biol., 206: 813-826.
10. Dynes, J., Magnan, P., Bernatchez, L. and Rodriguez, M.A. 1999. Genetic and morphological variation between two forms of lacustrine brook charr. J. Fish Biol., 54: 955-972.
11. Ehlinger, T.J. 1989. Learning and individual variation in bluegill foraging: habitat-specific techniques. Anim. Behav., 38: 643-658.
12. Ehlinger, T.J. 1990. Habitat choice and phenotype-limited feeding efficiency in bluegill: individual differences and trophic polymorphism. Ecology, 71: 886-896.
13. Gatz, A.J., Jr. 1979. Community organisation in fishes as indicated by morphological features. Ecology, 60: 711-718.
14. Gill, A.B. and Hart, P.J.B. 1994. Feeding behaviour and prey choice of the threespine stickleback: the interacting effect of prey size, fish size and stomach fullness. Anim. Behav., 47: 921-932.
15. Hendry, A.P. and Taylor, E.B. 2004. How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? An evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs. Evolution, 58: 2319-2331.
16. Hendry, A.P., Taylor, E.B. and McPhail, J.D. 2002. Adaptive divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow: lake and stream stickleback in the Misty system. Evolution, 56: 1199-1216.
17. Hutchings, J.A. 1996. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, life histories. Ecoscience, 3: 25-32.
18. Jonsson, B. and Skúlason, S. 2000. Polymorphic segregation in Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.) from Vatnshlídarvatn, a shallow Icelandic lake. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 69: 55-74.
19. Klemetsen, A., Elliott, J.M., Knudsen, R. and Sørensen, P. 2002. Evidence for genetic differences in the offspring of two sympatric morphs of Arctic charr. J. Fish Biol., 60: 933-950.
20. Lauder, G.V. and Drucker, E.G.D. 2004. Morphology and experimental hydrodynamics of fish fin control surface. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 29: 556-571.
21. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. and Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
22. Malmquist, H.J. 1992. Phenotype-specific feeding behaviour of two Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus morphs. Oecologia, 92: 354-362.
23. Marchand, F., Magnan, P. and Boisclair, D. 2003. Differential time budgets of two forms of juvenile brook charr in the open-water zone. J. Fish Biol., 63: 687-698.
24. McLaughlin, R.L. 2001. Behavioural diversification in brook charr: adaptive responses to local conditions. J. Anim. Ecol., 70: 325-337.
25. McLaughlin, R.L., Grant, J.W.A. and Kramer, D.L. 1994. Foraging movements in relation to morphology, water-column use, and diet for recently emerged brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in still-water pools. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51: 268-279.
26. McLaughlin, R.L., Ferguson, M.M. and Noakes, D.L.G. 1999. Adaptive peaks and alternative foraging tactics in brook charr: evidence of short-term divergent selection for sitting-and-waiting and actively searching. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 45: 386-395.
27. Ministère de l'agriculture, des pêcheries et de l'alimentation Québec (MAPAQ). 1990. Atelier de travail sur la génétique des salmonidés d'élevage au Québec. Cahier de conférences. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
28. Noakes, D.L. 1989. Early life history and behaviour of charrs. Physiol. Ecol. Jpn. Spec., 1: 173-186.
29. Peres-Neto, P.R. and Magnan, P. 2004. The influence of swimming demand on phenotypic plasticity and morphological integration: a comparison of two polymorphic charr species. Oecologia, 140: 36-45.
30. Pigeon, D., Chouinard, A. and Bernatchez, L. 1997. Multiple modes of speciation involved in the parallel evolution of sympatric morphotypes of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis, Salmonidae). Evolution, 51: 196-205.
31. Piper, R.G., McElwain, I.B., Orme, L.E., McCraren, J.P., Fowler, L.G. and Leonard, J.R. 1982. Fish Hatchery Management. Washington, DC: US Department of the Interior, Fish, and Wildlife Service.
32. Proulx, R. and Magnan, P. 2002. Physiological performance of two forms of lacustrine brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis, in the open-water habitat. Environ. Biol. Fish., 64: 127-136.
33. Proulx, R. and Magnan, P. 2004. Contribution of phenotypic plasticity and heredity to the trophic polymorphism of lacustrine brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis M.). Evol. Ecol. Res., 6: 503-522.
34. Quinn, G. and Keough, M. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Reist, J.D. 1986. An empirical evaluation of coefficients used in residual and allometric adjustment of size covariation. Can. J. Zool., 64: 1363-1368.
36. Robinson, B.W. and Parsons, K.J. 2002. Changing times, spaces, and faces: tests and implications of adaptive morphological plasticity in the fishes of northern postglacial lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 59: 1819-1833.
37. Robinson, B.W. and Wilson, D.S. 1994. Character release and displacement in fishes: a neglected literature. Am. Nat., 144: 596-627.
38. Robinson, B.W. and Wilson, D.S. 1996. Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity in a trophically polymorphic population in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Evol. Ecol., 10: 631-652.
39. Robinson, B.W., Wilson, D.S. and Margosian, A.S. 2000. A pluralistic analysis of character release in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Ecology, 81: 2799-2912.
40. Rogers, S., Gagnon, V. and Bernatchez, L. 2002. Genetically based phenotype-environment association for swimming behavior in lake whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus clupeaformis Mitchill). Evolution, 56: 2322-2329.
41. Ruzzante, D.E., Walde, S.J., Cussac, V.E., Macchi, P.J. and Alonso, M.F. 1998. Trophic polymorphism, habitat and diet segregation in Percichthys trucha (Pisces: Percichthyidae) in the Andes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 65: 191-214.
42. SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 8.0. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
43. Schluter, D. 1996. Ecological causes of adaptive variation. Am. Nat., 148: S40-S64.
44. Skúlason, S. and Smith, T.B. 1995. Resource polymorphism in vertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol., 10: 366-370.
45. Skúlason, S., Snorrason, S.S., Ota, D. and Noakes, D.L.G. 1993. Genetically based differences in foraging behaviour among sympatric morphs of arctic charr (Pisces: Salmonidae). Anim. Behav., 45: 1179-1192.
46. Smith, T.B. and Skúlason, S. 1996. Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphism in fishes, amphibians and birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27: 111-133.
47. Stamps, J. 2003. Behavioural processes affecting development: Tinbergen's fourth question comes of age. Anim. Behav., 66: 1-13.
48. Svanbäck, R. and Eklöv, P. 2002. Effects of habitat and food resources on morphology and ontogenic growth trajectories in perch. Oecologia, 131: 61-70.
49. Svanbäck, R. and Eklöv, P. 2006. Genetic variation and phenotypic plasticity: causes of morphological and dietary variation in Eurasian perch. Evol. Ecol. Res., 8: 1-13.
50. Swanson, B.O., Gibb, A.C., Marks, J.C. and Hendrickson, D.A. 2003. Trophic polymorphism and behavioral differences decrease intraspecific competition in cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi. Ecology, 84: 1441-1446.
51. Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Venne, H. and Magnan, P. 1995. The impact of intra- and interspecific interactions on young-of-the-year brook charr, in temperate lakes. J. Fish Biol., 46: 669-686.
53. Wainwright, P.C. 1988. Morphology and ecology, functional basis of feeding constraints in Caribbean labrid fishes. Ecology, 69: 635-645.
54. Wankowski, J.W.J. 1979. Morphological limitations, prey size selectivity, and growth response of juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. J. Fish Biol., 14: 89-100.
55. Wankowski, J.W.J. and Thorpe, J.E. 1979. The role of food particle size in the growth of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J. Fish Biol., 14: 351-370.
56. Webb, P.W. 1984. Body form, locomotion and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. Am. Zool., 24: 107-120.
57. Wimberger, P.H. 1994. Trophic polymorphism, plasticity, and speciation in vertebrates. In Theory and Application in Fish Feeding Ecology (D.J. Stouder, K.L. Fresh and R.J. Feller, eds.), pp. 19-43. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.