Transfer of skills from the experimental model to the patients

Current Urology Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 96-99

  Piechaud, P Thierry ^a   Pansadoro, A ^b  

^a CLINIQUE SAINT AUGUSTIN   (France)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS; CADAVER; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; OPERATING ROOM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLICATION; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; SKILL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEACHER; ANIMAL MODEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; HUMAN; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

CADAVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LAPAROSCOPY; MENTORS; MODELS, ANIMAL; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 33746508609     PISSN: 15272737     EISSN: 15346285     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-006-0066-1     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Trabulsi EJ, Guillonneau B: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005, 173:1072-1079.
2. Cathelinau X, Arroyo C, Rozet F, et al.: Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the Montsouris experience after 84 cases. Eur Urol 2005, 47:780-784.
3. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, et al.: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 2005, 95(suppl 2):102-105.
4. Ramacciato G: Ten years of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lesson learned from 104 procedures. Am Surg 2005, 71:321-325.
5. Laguna MP, Schreuders LC, Rassweiler J, et al.: Development of laparoscopic surgery and training facilities in Europe: results of a survey of the European Society of Uro-Technology (ESUT). Eur Urol 2005, 47:346-351.
6. Wang DS, Winfield HN: Survey of urological laparoscopic practice patterns in the Midwest. J Urol 2004, 172:2282-2286.
7. Teber D, Dekel Y, Frede T, et al.: The Heilbronn laparoscopic training program for laparoscopic suturing: concept and validation. J Endourol 2005, 19:230-238.
8. Katz R, Nadu A, Olsson LE, et al: A simplified 5-step model for training laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. J Urol 2003, 169:2041-2044.
9. Subramonian K, DeSylva S, Bishai P, et al.: Acquiring surgical skills: a comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery. Eur Urol 2004, 45:346-351. This study shows that for inexperienced subjects, laparoscopy is more difficult to learn than open surgery.
10. Cadeddu JA, Wolfe JS, Nakada S, et al.: Complications of laparoscopic procedures after concentrated training in urological laparoscopy. J Urol 2001, 166:2109-2111. The authors pointed out that an intensive training seems to decrease the learning curve for laparoscopy.
11. Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Weber M, et al.: The experience of the Laparoscopy Working Group of the German Urologic Association. J Urol 1998, 160:18-21.
12. Gupta R, Cathelinau X, Rozet F, Vallancien G: Feedback from operative performance to improve training program of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2004, 18:836-839.
13. Frede T, Stock C, Rassweiler JJ, Alken P: Retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic suturing: tips and strategies for improving efficiency. J Endourol 200, 14:905-914.
14. Shalhav AL, Dabagia MD, Wagner TT, et al.: Training postgraduate urologists in laparoscopic surgery: the current challenge. J Urol 2002, 167:2135-2137. The authors suggest that a mini residency may be a more rapid and safer process of disseminating laparoscopic urologic surgery.
15. Supe A, Dalvi A, Prabhu R, et al.: Cadaver as a model for laparoscopic training. Indian J Gastroenterol 2005, 24:95-96.
16. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG: Effectiveness of laparoscopic cadaveric dissection in enhancing resident comprehension of pelvic anatomy. J Am Col Surg 2001, 192:492-497.
17. Katz R, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, et al.: Cadaveric versus porcine models in urological laparoscopic training. Urol Int 2003, 71:310-315.
18. Fabrizio MD, Tuerk I, Schellhammer PF: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach. J Urol 2003, 169:2063-2065.