Physiographic characteristics of bridge-stream intersections

River Research and Applications

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 617-630

  Johnson, Peggy A ^a  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge maintenance; Bridges; Channel stability; Physiographic regions; River management

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE; CATCHMENT; RIVER DISCHARGE; RIVER MANAGEMENT; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; STREAM CHANNEL;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

BOS TAURUS;

EID: 33746491579     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.924     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Atwood WW. 1940. The Physiographic Provinces of North America. Ginn and Company: New York.
2. Beeson CE, Doyle PE. 1995. Comparison of bank erosion at vegetated and nonvegetated channel bends. Water Resources Bulletin 31: 983-990.
3. Castro JM, Jackson PL. 2001. Bankfull discharge recurrence intervals and regional hydraulic geometry relationships. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37: 1249-1262.
4. Copeland RR, McComas DN, Thorne CR, Soar PJ, Jonas MM, Fripp JB. 2001. Hydraulic design of stream restoration projects. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Report No. ERDC/CHL TR-01-28, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC.
5. Dietz RS. 1952. Geomorphic evolution of the continental terrace (continental shelf and slope). American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 36: 1802-1819.
6. Dohrenwend JC. 1987. Basin and Range. In Geomorphic Systems of North America, Chapter 9. Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado.
7. Doll BA, et al. 2002. Hydraulic geometry relationships for urban streams throughout the Piedmont of North Carolina. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 641-652.
8. Emerson JW. 1971. Channelization, a case study. Science 173: 325-326.
9. Graf WL. 1987. Geomorphic Systems of North America. Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado.
10. Hack JT. 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 294-B: 45-97.
11. Hack JT. 1965. Geomorphology of the Shenandoah Valley, Virginia and West Virginia, and origin of the residual ore deposits. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 484.
12. Harman WH, et al. 1999. Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships for North Carolina streams. In AWRA Wildland Hydrology Symposium Proceedings, Olsen DS, Potyondy JP (eds). AWRA Summer Symposium: Bozeman, MT.
13. Harman WH, et al. 2004. Bankfull regional curves for North Carolina mountain streams. Unpublished report, North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute, North Carolina State University Water Quality Group. http:// www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/wqg/sri/mtnpaper.html
14. Johnson PA. 2002. Incorporating road crossings in stream restoration projects. Ecological Restoration 20: 270-277.
15. Johnson PA. 2005. Preliminary assessment and rating of stream channel stability near bridges. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 131(10): 845-852.
16. Johnson PA, Tessier M, Hey RD, Rosgen DL. 2001. The use of vanes for local abutment scour reduction. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 127: 772-779.
17. Johnson PA, Hey RD, Brown ER, Rosgen DL. 2002. Stream restoration in the vicinity of bridges. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 55-67.
18. Lagasse PF, Byars MS, Zevenbergen LW, Clopper PE. 2001. Bridge scour and stream instability countermeasures. FHWA Report NHI 01-003, HEC-23, Federal Highway Administration, Arlington, Virginia.
19. Leopold LB, Maddock T. 1953. The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 252.
20. Madole RF, et al. 1987. Rocky mountains. In Geomorphic Systems of North America. Chapter 7. Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado.
21. Maryland Department of Natural Resources. 2002. Maryland's Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan. Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland (available on-line at: http://www.dnr.state.md.us/ bay/czm/nps/plans/summary.html).
22. McCandless TL. 2003. Maryland Stream Survey: Bankfull discharge and channel characteristics of streams in the coastal plain hydrologic region. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office, Report CBFO-S03-02, Annapolis, Maryland.
23. McCandless TL, Everett RA. 2002. Bankfull discharge and channel characteristics of streams in the piedmont hydrologic region. US Fish and Wildlife, Report CBFO-SO2-01, Annapolis, Maryland.
24. Mills HH, et al. 1987. Appalachian mountains and plateaus. In Geomorphic Systems of North America, Chapter 2. Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado.
25. Muhls DR, et al. 1987. Pacific coast and mountain system. In Geomorphic Systems of North America, Chapter 13. Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado.
26. Osterkamp WR, et al. 1987. Great Plains. In Geomorphic Systems of North America, Chapter 6. Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado.
27. Osterkamp WR, Hedman ER. 1982. Perennial-streamflow characteristics related to channel geometry and sediment in Missouri river basin. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1242.
28. Palone RS, Todd AH. 1998. Chesapeake Bay Riparian handbook: a guide for establishing and maintaining riparian forest buffers. USDA Forest Service, Report NA-TP-02-97: Radnor, PA. (Available at http:// www.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/subcommittee/nsc/forest/sect02.pdf)
29. Prestegaard KL. 2000. Preliminary assessment of morphological and hydrological characteristics of piedmont and coastal plain streams in Maryland. Report to Maryland Department of the Environment: Baltimore, Maryland.
30. Richardson EV, Davis SR. 2001. Evaluating scour at bridges, Fourth Edition. U.S. Department of Transportation, HEC-18, FHWA-IP-90-017. 132.
31. Rube RV. 1970. Stream regimen and man's manipulation. In Environmental Geomorphology, Annual Geomorphology Symposia, Coates DR (ed.). State University of New York: Binghamton; 9-23.
32. Simon A. 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 14: 11-26.
33. Simon A. 1992. Energy, time, and channel evolution in catastrophically disturbed fluvial systems. Journal of Geomorphology 5: 345-372.
34. Simon A, Rinaldi M. 2000. Channel instability in the loess area of the midwestern United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36: 133-150.
35. Sweet WV, Geratz JW. 2003. Bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships and recurrence intervals for North Carolina's Coastal Plain. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39: 861-871.
36. Thornbury WD. 1965. Regional Geomorphology of the United States. Wiley and Sons: New York, NY.
37. US Geological Survey. 2003. A tapestry of time and terrain: the union of two maps - geology and topography. http://tapestry.usgs.gov/physiogr/ physio.html.
38. US Geological Survey. 2004. Regionalization of channel geomorphology characteristics for streams in New York State. Unpublished report of the US Geological Survey: Troy, NY.
39. Vermont Water Quality Division. 2001. Provisional hydraulic geometry curves. Unpublished report to the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation: Waterbury, Vermont. Available at http:// www.vtwaterquality.org/rivers/docs/rv_hydraulicgeocurves.pdf
40. Walker HJ, Coleman JM. 1987. Coastal Plain. In Geomorphic Systems of North America, Chapter 3. Geological Society of America: Boulder, Colorado.
41. Wenger S. 1999. A review of the scientific literature on riparian buffer width, extent and vegetation. Office of Public Service and Outreach, Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia: Athens, Georgia (available on-line at http://outreach.ecology.uga.edu/tool/buffers/lit_review.pdf)
42. Wilson DV. 1979. Changes in Channel Characteristics, 1938-1974, of the Homochitto River and Tributaries, Mississippi. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 79-554, 18.