Learning from experience in family support programs: A preliminary review of three related initiatives

Social Policy Journal

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 5-25

  Carrilio, Terry E ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissemination; Family support; Implementation; Outcomes; Program development

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746489827     PISSN: 15332942     EISSN: 15332950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J185v02n02_02     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Breakey, G. & Uohara-Pratt, B. (1991). Health growth for Hawaii’s Healthy Start. Zero to Three: Bulletin of the National Center for Clinical Infant Programs, 11(4), 16-22.
2. Brilliant, E. (1986). Social work leadership-A missing ingredient. Social Work, Sept-Oct. 325-331.
3. Buka, S. & Earls, F. (1993). Early determinants of delinquency and violence. Health Affairs, 12(4), 46-64.
4. California Legislative Analysts Office (1999). How does it work? Proposition 10:What role should the legislature play in its implementation? January 13, 1999.
5. Californa State Attorney General (1994). Illegal aliens. Ineligibility for public services. Verification and reporting. Proposition 187: Record 1007.
6. California State Senate (1998). S.B. 1525 California Families and Children Home Visit Program.
7. Carrilio, T. (1998). The California Safe and Healthy Families Family Support Home Visiting Model, executive summary. Sacramento: California Department of Social Services Office of Child Abuse Prevention. Second edition.
8. Carrilio, T. (1999). Curriculum guidelines for ABC center-based services. Sacramento:California Department of Social Services Office of Child Abuse Prevention.
9. Carrilio, T. (In press). Family support program development-Integrating research, practice and policy. Journal of Family Social Work.
10. Carrilio, T., Packard, T. & Clapp, J. (in press). Nothing in-nothing out: Barriers to the use of performance data in social service programs. Administration in Social Work.
11. Carrilio, T., Packard, T., Cannady, L., Darling, M., Chamberlin, J., Gamble, L. & Bergthold, T. (2002). Final report-Answers Benefitting Children program evalua-tion. Technical report submitted to the California Department of Social Services Office of Child Abuse Prevention.
12. Copeland, V. & Wexler, S. (1995). Policy implementation in social welfare: A framework for analysis. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 22(3), 51-68.
13. Daro, D. & Harding, K. (1999). Healthy Families America: Using research to enhance practice. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children: Recent program evaluations (pp. 152-176), 9(1) David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
14. Duggan, A., McFarlane, E., Windham, A., Rohde, C., Salkever, D., Fuddy, L., Rosenberg, L., Buchbinder, S. & Sia, C. (1999). Evaluation of Hawaii’s Healthy Start Program. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children: Recent program evaluations (pp. 66-90) 9(1). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
15. Erikson, M. & Kurtz-Reimer, K. (1999). Infants, toddlers, and families: A framework for support and intervention. New York: The Guilford Press.
16. Garbarino, J. (1995). Raising children in a socially toxic environment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
17. Garvin, D.A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71, 78-91.
18. Gomby, D. (1999). Understanding evaluations of home visitation programs. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children: Recent program evaluations (pp. 27-43), 9(1). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
19. Gomby, D., Culross, P. & Behrman, R. (1999). Home visiting: Recent program evaluations- analysis and recommendations. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children:Recent program evaluations (pp. 4-26), 9(1). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
20. Gomby, D., Larson, C., Lewitt, E.M. & Behrman, R. (1993). Home visiting: Analysis and recommendations. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children: Home visiting (pp. 6-22), 3(3). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
21. Guterman, N.B. (2001). Stopping child maltreatment before it starts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Hall, J.A., Carswell, C., Walsh, E., Huber, D.L. & Jampoler, J.S. (2002). Iowa Case management: Innovative social casework. Social Work, 47(2), 132-141.
23. Harachi, T.W., Abbott, R.D., Catalano, R.F., Haggerty, K.P. & Fleming, C.B. (1999). Opening the black box: Using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27 (5), 711-731.
24. Horsch, K. (1996). Results-based accountability systems: Opportunities and challenges. The Evaluation Exchange, II, 2-3.
25. Kagen, S., Powell, D., Weisbourd, P. & Zigler, E. (Eds.). (1987). America’s family support programs. New Haven: Yale University Press.
26. Kagen, S.L. & Neville, P. (1993). Integrating services for children and families. New Haven: Yale University Press.
27. Karoly, L., Greenwood, P., Evringham, S., Hoube, J., Kilburn, M.R., Rydell, P., Saunders, M. & Chiesa, J. (1998). Investing in our children: What we know and don’t know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation. Rand MR 898-TCWF.
28. Krugman, R. (1993). Universal home visiting: A recommendation from the U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children:Home visiting (pp. 184-191), 3(3). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
29. Landsverk, J., Carrilio, T., Connelly, C. & Ganger, W. (2001). Evaluation of Healthy Families San Diego. Final technical report, submitted to the California Department of Social Services, The Wellness Foundation, and Stuart Foundation.
30. Margie, N. & Phillips, D. (Eds). (1999). Revisiting home visiting: A summary of a workshop. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
31. McCurdy, K. (1995). Home visiting. Technical paper prepared for the National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse.
32. Mrazek, P. & Haggerty, R. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risk for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, National Academy of Sciences.
33. O’Looney, J. (1997). Marking progress toward service integration: Learning to use evaluation to overcome barriers. Administration in Social Work, 21(3/4), 31-65.
34. Olds, D. & Henderson, C. (1989). The prevention of maltreatment. In Cichetti, D. & Carlson, V. (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 722-763). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Olds, D., Henderson, C., Kitzman, H., Eckenrode, J., Cole, R. & Tattlebaum, R. (1999). Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses: Recent findings. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children: Recent program evaluations (pp. 44-63), 9(1). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
36. Olds, D. & Kitzman, H. (1993). Review of research on home visiting for pregnant women and parents of young children. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children:Home visiting (pp. 53-92), 3(3). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
37. Patton, M. (1997). Utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38. Pieper, M. (1994). Science, not scientism: The robustness of naturalistic clinical research. In Sherman, E. & Reid, W. (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (71-88). New York: Columbia University Press.
39. Reynolds, A.J., Temple, J., Robertson, D. & Mann, E. (2001). Long term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(18), 2339-2346.
40. Rossi, P., Freeman, H. & Lipsey, M. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Royce, D. & Thyer, B. (1996). Program evaluation: An introduction (2nd ed.). Chicago:Nelson-Hall.
42. Schorr, L. (1997). Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Doubleday.
43. Schorr, L. & Schorr, D. (1988). Within our reach: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
44. Shonkoff, J. & Phillips, D.A. (2001). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development-An introduction. Zero to Three: Bulletin of the National Center for Clinical Infant Programs, 21(5), 4-7.
45. Shonkoff, J. & Phillips, D. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine Board on Children, Youth and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46. Stein, L. & Santos, A. (1998). Assertive community treatment of persons with severe mental illness. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.
47. Straw, R.B. & Herrell, J.M. (2002). A framework for understanding and improving multisite evaluations. New Directions for Evaluation, 94 (summer), 5-15.
48. Walker, S. (2001). Family support and social work practice: Opportunities for child mental health work. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 9(2), 25-40.
49. Weiss, H. (1993). Home visits: Necessary but not sufficient. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children: Home visiting (pp. 113-128), 3(3). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.
50. Witkin, S.&Harrison, W. (2001). Whose evidence and for what purpose? Social Work 46(4), 293-296.
51. Yoshikawa, H. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on social outcomes and delinquency. In Behrman, R. (Ed.), The future of children: Long term outcomes of early childhood programs (pp. 51-70), 5(3). David and Lucille Packard Foundation.