Teachers' and students' preferences for mathematics interventions: Implications for teacher acceptability in consultation

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 157-174

  Arra, Christopher T ^a   Bahr, Michael W ^b  

^a NORTHERN VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746444278     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc1603_2     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Arra, C. T. (2001). CBM, IRP, and CIRP reliability analyses. Unpublished raw data.
2. de Mesquita, P. B., & Zollman, A. (1995). Teachers' preferences for academic intervention strategies in mathematics: Implications for instructional consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 6, 159-174.
3. Elliott, S. N., Witt, J. C., Galvin, G. A., & Moe, G. L. (1986). Children's involvement in intervention selection: Acceptability of interventions for misbehaving peers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 235-241.
4. Fink, A. D., (1995). Children's perceptions of treatment acceptability. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 56, 2862.
5. Goldberg, R., & Shapiro, E. S., (1995). In-vivo rating of treatment acceptability by children: Effects of probability instruction on students spelling performance under group contingency conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 415-432.
6. Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Acceptability of child treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy, 11, 329-344.
7. Martens, B. K., Peterson, R. L., Witt, J. C., & Cirone, S. (1986). Teacher perceptions of school-based interventions. Exceptional Children, 53, 213-223.
8. Nastasi, B., Varjas, K., Schensul, S., Silva, K., Schensul, J., & Ratnayake, P. (2000). The participatory intervention model: A framework for conceptualizing and promoting intervention acceptability. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 207-232.
9. Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavior treatments: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
10. Rhymer, K., Hennington, C., Skinner, C. H., & Looby, E. J. (1999). The effects of explicit timing on mathematics performance in second-grade Caucasian and African-American students. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 397-407.
11. Skinner, C. H., Shapiro, E. S., Turco, T. L., Cole, C., & Brown, D. (1992) A comparison of self-and peer-delivered immediate corrective feedback on multiplication performance. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 101-116.
12. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1977). Applying behavior analysis procedures with children and youth. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
13. Witt, J. C. (1986). Teachers' resistance to the use of school-based interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 37-44.
14. Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Witt, J. C., Elliott, S. N., & Martens, B. K. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral intervention used in classrooms: The influence of amount of teacher time, severity of behavior problem, and type of intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 95-104.
16. Witt, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (1983). Assessing the acceptability of behavioral interventions used in the classrooms. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 510-517.
17. Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers' judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204-209.