How safe is magnetic resonance imaging in patients with contraceptive implants?;Wie sicher ist die MRT bei patientinnen mit kontrazeptiven implantaten?

Radiologe

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 574-578

  Muhler M ^a   Taupitz, M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

ESSURE; Intrauterine device (IUD); Intrauterine system (IUS); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); MR safety

Indexed keywords

HORMONE; METAL; STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; EUROPE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SAFETY; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TEMPERATURE;

BURNS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIATION INJURIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 33746442423     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1212-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. De Wilde J (2004) A-373 clinical safety practice, RC-1613 safety considerations in MR. ECR 2004, Vienna
2. Engels JML (2004) A-372 biophysical effects and MR safety, RC 1613 safety considerations in MR. ECR 2004, Vienna
3. Hall GH, Guthrie KA, Turnbull LW (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging appearances of the Mirena and GyneFix intra-uterine contraceptive devices: a report of two cases. Br J Fam Plan 26:224-226
4. Hess T, Stepanow B, Knopp MV (1996) Safety of intrauterine contraceptive devices during MR imaging. Eur Radiol 6:66-68
5. Intrauterine Devices (IUDs). http://www.mrisafety.com (last visit 20 Feb 2004)
6. Levine D, Zuo C, Faro CB, Chen Q (2001) Potential heating effect in the gravid uterus during MR HASTE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:856-861
7. Mark AS, Hricak H (1987) Intrauterine contraceptive devices: MR imaging. Radiology 162:311-314
8. Pasquale SA, Russer TJ, Foldesy R, Mezrich RS (1997) Lack of interaction between magnetic resonance imaging and the copper-T380A IUD. Contraception 55:169-173
9. Personal communcation Schering Deutschland (2004) Email sender: Regina Schneidereit (Regina. Schneidereit@SCHERING.DE)
10. Produktprospekt essure - Eine neue Technik für die hysteroskopische Sterilisation der Frau. Fa. Conceptus Europe Versailles, Frankreich. http://www.conceptus.com
11. Sawyer-Glover AM, Shellock FG (2000) Pre-MRI procedure screening: recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:92-106
12. Schenck JF (1996) The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23:815-850
13. Shellock FG (2000) Magnetic resonance procedures: health effects and safety
14. Shellock FG (2000) Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:30-36
15. Shellock FG (2001) Pocket guide to MR procedures and metallic objects: update 2001
16. Shellock FG (2002) Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:721-732
17. Shellock FG (2002) New metallic implant used for permanent contraception in women: evaluation of MR safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1513-1516
18. Shellock FG (2004) Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety, implants and devices: 2004 edition
19. Shellock FG, Crues JV 3rd (2002) MR safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1349-1352
20. Shellock FG, Nogueira M, Morisoli S (1995) MR imaging and vascular access ports: ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 5:481-484
21. Teitelbaum GP, Bradley WG jr, Klein BD (1988) MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils. Radiology 166:657-664
22. What is your current opinion regarding scanning women with IUDs in place? http://www.radiology.upmc.edu/MRsafety/q&a\iud.html, E. Kanal (30. November 1995)